Case Reports in Pathology

Case Reports in Pathology / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4704781 | 5 pages |

Intrabiliary Hepatic Metastasis of Colorectal Carcinoma Mimicking Primary Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: Tibor Tot
Received21 Jan 2016
Revised07 Jun 2016
Accepted08 Jun 2016
Published26 Jun 2016


Intrabiliary metastasis from colorectal carcinoma (CRC) growing within or invading bile ducts is not a very common pattern. However, accurate diagnosis of metastatic lesions is very important for selection of adjuvant therapy and prognosis. We report a case of 71-year-old male who developed painless jaundice due to hepatobiliary obstruction. MRI demonstrated 1.4 cm intraductal mass at hepatic hilum with severe intrahepatic ductal dilation, consistent with cholangiocarcinoma. ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) showed intraductal segmental biliary stricture. Biopsy from the lesion showed adenocarcinoma favoring primary cholangiocarcinoma due to the papillary morphology and location of the mass. His past history was significant for rectosigmoid carcinoma (pT1N0) ten years ago and liver resection for metastatic CRC four years ago. He subsequently underwent central hepatectomy with resection of common bile duct. Grossly, there was a 1.2 cm intraductal mass at the bifurcation of bile ducts with multiple nodules in liver parenchyma. Microscopic examination revealed intraductal carcinoma with papillary architecture colonizing bile duct epithelium with resultant dilation and tortuosity. Occasional liver parenchymal nodules show classical metastatic pattern resembling CRC. Because of two distinct morphologic patterns and patient’s past history, immunostains were performed. CK7 stained uninvolved bile duct epithelium with no staining in intrabiliary metastatic growth. CK20 and CDX2 were positive, thus confirming intrabiliary growth as metastatic growth from CRC. In summary, findings from our case indicate that intrabiliary growth of metastatic CRC can easily be overlooked with major duct involvement. Pathologic evaluation with use of immunohistochemical stains is very important to achieve correct diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Intrabiliary growth along the biliary track is not a well-recognized behavior for hepatic metastasis. Biliary involvement by colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), also known as intrabiliary metastasis of colorectal carcinoma, is a clinically rare event, with the annual incidence of 0.00067% in the United States [1]. There have been only two statistical studies for these metastases in the western population regarding the survival and prevalence [2, 3]. This metastasis is an occult process that the average interval from the primary lesion resection to intrahepatic metastatic lesion resection is approximately 28 months [2]. Moreover, it is difficult to differentiate intrabiliary CRLM from primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (PICC) morphologically [4, 5]. Dysplastic change in biliary epithelium is used to differentiate primary cholangiocarcinoma from metastatic lesions. Therefore, careful evaluation of patient’s history and morphologic features with immunohistochemical (IHC) studies, such as CK7, CK20, and CDX2 staining, can provide definite diagnosis. Here, we reported a case of intrabiliary CRLM that happened approximately 10 years after the resection of the primary rectosigmoid carcinoma and discussed the characteristics of intrabiliary metastasis and its differentiations from the PICC.

2. Case Presentation

A 71-year-old gentleman presented with painless jaundice. His initial laboratory evaluation showed elevated AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, serum bilirubin, and CA19.9. His past history was significant for rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma (pT1N0) resection ten years ago (Figure 1(a)). He also had liver resection for colorectal cancer metastasis four years ago (Figure 1(b)) and history of melanoma with resection a year ago. Further evaluation by the MRI study showed a 1.4 1.1 cm intraductal mass consistent with primary cholangiocarcinoma at hepatic hilum with severe bilobar intrahepatic ductal dilation (Figure 2). ERCP showed intraductal segmental biliary stricture in the common hepatic duct. A biopsy was done and a stent was placed. The pathologic evaluation of biopsy from the bile duct stricture was significant for adenocarcinoma (Figure 1(c)). Because of papillary architecture and intraductal presence of a mass, a diagnosis of primary cholangiocarcinoma was favored.

The patient subsequently underwent central hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. On laparotomy, he was found to have a mass at the hilar bifurcation compressing the bile duct. The patient thus underwent resection of segments 4 and 5A and resection of the common bile duct and left and right hepatic ducts. On gross examination, there were multiple tan-white nodules ranging in size from 0.1 to 0.5 mm in the central liver. Within the duct at the bifurcation, there was a polypoid mass into the lumen, measuring 1.2 cm in the greatest dimension. Sections from these sites showed adenocarcinoma. Intrabiliary tumor showed papillary architectures with colonization of bile ducts (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)). There was dilation of bile ducts with intrabiliary tumors. Smaller satellite nodules in liver showed typical metastatic colon carcinoma like morphology (Figure 1(f)). Because of these two different morphological patterns, immunostains were performed. However, IHC staining of both intrabiliary and smaller hepatic nodules demonstrated same pattern with positive CDX2 expression and CK20 expression and negative for CK7 (Figure 3). Based on patient’s history and current pathologic findings, a diagnosis was made of metastatic intrabiliary CRLM. The patient finished three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Subsequent surveillance scan was unremarkable. The patient was doing well on surveillance with no new symptoms.

3. Discussion

Intrabiliary growth of metastatic carcinoma was first reported in 1946 with symptomatic jaundice, biliary dilatation, and cirrhosis on autopsy [6]. Study from MD Anderson Cancer Center revealed that the primary lesions of intrabiliary growth of hepatic metastasis are composed predominantly of colorectal carcinoma (93%), among which the rectosigmoid colon is the most common site of the primary tumor [2]. According to this study, 72% CRLM show major duct involvement, and 28% show minor duct involvement. It has been reported that CRLM with major bile duct involvement may cause more obvious clinical symptoms, such as abnormal LFTs (liver function tests) indicating the biliary obstruction, abnormal imaging results that show biliary disease, and histologic findings related to biliary disease and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Rare cases demonstrate the intrahepatic tumor dissemination and multiple tumor nodules.

Two patterns of intrabiliary metastasis are described: colonization of the bile duct and tumor floating and blocking the ductal lumen, with each pattern comprising 81% of the cases [2]. Our report fits more colonization pattern. There are controversial opinions on the prognosis of the different patterns of CRLM. Okano et al. found that patients with macroscopic bile duct invasion obtain the highest 5-year survival rate compared with patient showing microscopic bile duct invasion and no bile duct invasion [7]. Kubo et al. explained this paradoxical finding that the tumor with macroscopic biliary involvement is less aggressive and better differentiated [8]. Nevertheless, studies performed by Povoski et al. and Estrella et al. both indicated that there are actually no significant differences of survival rate and differentiation between major and minor duct involvement groups [9]. In our case, we found that the metastatic adenocarcinomas involved predominantly major duct and produce tumor nodules with smaller hepatic metastasis, however, with rare minor duct involvement, as well. The intrabiliary metastatic lesion retains some features of the primary lesion, such as cribriform architecture, stratified, pencil-shaped nuclei, and dirty necrosis. However, it had some morphologic aspects that mimic the PICC, which is usually moderate to well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with glandular and tubular formation [10]. These mimics can be even complicated by the laboratory and imaging similarity between these two types of lesions [3, 9]. Based on the mechanism and pathophysiologic changes, the LFTs abnormalities related to biliary obstruction such as elevated CEAs and alkaline phosphatase are commonly found in CRLM. The CT, MRI, and/or ERCP findings of CRLM are usually nonspecific, comprising intrahepatic mass, biliary dilatation, and/or mural thickening [11, 12].

Therefore, differentiation of the CRLM from the PICC relies on the careful scrutinizing of the patient’s clinical history and the application of IHC studies. Although most of the metastasis happens within 3 years from the discovery and resection of the primary lesion, the metastasis in our case happens almost 10 years after the treatment of the primary resection [2]. Such long interval between the intrahepatic lesion and the primary tumor may mask the disease progression. This extremely difficult diagnosis can be established with CD20−/CK7+ staining. Although CK20 is low to moderate specific for PICC, the combination of CK20 and CK7 can reliably differentiate PICC from CRLM [10, 13, 14].

In conclusion, we reported a case of intrabiliary CRLM and uncommon metastatic lesion discovered 10 years after the excision of the primary colorectal adenocarcinoma, as one of the first reports of imaging and serial pathology studies during long term follow-up. Due to the rarity of these metastases in the United States, long intervals after the excision of primary lesion, and its similarity with PICC in radiologic and morphologic evaluation, CRLM can be misdiagnosed as PICC even with major duct involvement, as seen in this patient. Therefore, the past medical history of colorectal carcinoma and application of IHC studies of CK7, CK20, and CDX2 are helpful to achieve the correct diagnosis and management.


This case was presented as a poster presentation in College of American Pathology (CAP) 2015 annual meeting in Nashville, TN. The abstract was published in Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine as “Intrabiliary Hepatic Metastasis of Colorectal Carcinoma Mimicking Primary Cholangiocarcinoma” in Vol. 139, October 2015, P: e24-e25.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. T. Patel, “Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States,” Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1353–1357, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. S. Estrella, M. L. Othman, M. W. Taggart et al., “Intrabiliary growth of liver metastases clinicopathologic features, prevalence, and outcome,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1571–1579, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. A. Riopel, D. S. Klimstra, C. V. Godellas, L. H. Blumgart, and W. H. Westra, “Intrabiliary growth of metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma: a pattern of intrahepatic spread easily confused with primary neoplasia of the biliary tract,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1030–1036, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. A. Seshadri and U. Majhi, “Endobiliary metastasis from rectal cancer mimicking intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 40, article 123, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Nagler and A. M. Rochwarger, “Metastatic colon carcinoma simulating primary bile duct carcinoma via endoscopic cholangiography,” Gastrointestinal Radiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75–76, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. A. Herbut and J. S. Watson, “Metastatic cancer of the extrahepatic bile ducts producing jaundice,” The American Journal of Clinical Patholology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 365–372, 1946. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Okano, J. Yamamoto, Y. Moriya et al., “Macroscopic intrabiliary growth of liver metastases from colorectal cancer,” Surgery, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 829–834, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Kubo, M. Sakamoto, N. Fukushima et al., “Less aggressive features of colorectal cancer with liver metastases showing macroscopic intrabiliary extension,” Pathology International, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 514–518, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. P. Povoski, D. S. Klimstra, K. T. Brown et al., “Recognition of intrabiliary hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma,” HPB Surgery, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 383–390, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Itatsu, T. Fujii, M. Sasaki, Y. Zen, and Y. Nakanuma, “Intraductal papillary cholangiocarcinoma and atypical biliary epithelial lesions confused with intrabiliary extension of metastatic colorectal carcinoma,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 54, no. 75, pp. 677–680, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. K. Okano, J. Yamamoto, T. Okabayashi et al., “CT imaging of intrabiliary growth of colorectal liver metastases: a comparison of pathological findings of resected specimens,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 75, no. 894, pp. 497–501, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Jinzaki, A. Tanimoto, K. Suzuki et al., “Liver metastases from colon cancer with intra-bile duct tumor growth: radiologic features,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 656–660, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Rullier, B. Le Bail, R. Fawaz, J. F. Blanc, J. Saric, and P. Bioulac-Sage, “Cytokeratin 7 and 20 expression in cholangiocarcinomas varies along the biliary tract but still differs from that in colorectal carcinoma metastasis,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 870–876, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Sasaki, K. Kawano, M. Aramaki, K. Nakashima, T. Yoshida, and S. Kitano, “Immunohistochemical expression of cytokeratins in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the liver,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 1999. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Yimin Dong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1311 Views | 400 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.