Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 153951, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/153951
Clinical Study

A Newly Developed Variable Stiffness Duodenoscope for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan

Received 3 August 2010; Accepted 28 October 2010

Academic Editor: Rami Eliakim

Copyright © 2010 Takao Itoi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Takagi, S. Ikeda, Y. Nakagawa, N. Sakaguchi, and T. Takahashi, “Retrograde pancreatography and cholangiography by fiber duodenoscope,” Gastroenterology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 445–452, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. B. Cotton, L. H. Blumgart, G. T. Davies et al., “Cannulation of papilla of vater via fiber-duodenoscope. Assessment of retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 60 patients,” Lancet, vol. 1, no. 7741, pp. 53–58, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Huibregtse, E. H. De Koster, and G. N. J. Tytgat, “A new multipurpose dudodenoscope,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 421–422, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Schapiro, “Clinical experience with electronic video duodenoscopy in a community hospital,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 1029–1030, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. A. Kozarek and S. L. Raltz, “Use of a double-channel duodenoscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 833–857, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Joyce, N. A. Ahmad, M. C. Beilstein et al., “Multicenter comparative trial of the V-scope system for therapeutic ERCP,” Endoscopy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 713–716, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. T. Odori, H. Goto, T. Arisawa, Y. Niwa, N. Ohmiya, and T. Hayakawa, “Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes,” Endoscopy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. I. Yoshikawa, H. Honda, K. Nagata et al., “Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3052–3055, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. J. Kaffes, A. Mishra, S. L. Ding et al., “A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 685–689, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. O. Othman, A. G. Bradley, A. Choudhary, R. M. Hoffman, and P. K. Roy, “Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Endoscopy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus