Research Article

Efficacy of Radiofrequency Diathermy versus Focused Ultrasound Therapy, Both Combined with Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, for Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy Treatment: A Randomized Intrasubject Assessor-Blind Trial

Table 2

Intra- and intergroup differences for RFD combined with IPC and FUS combined with IPC.

Thigh circumferencesBaseline N = 20Post-treatment N = 20Intragroup differencesIntergroup differences
RFDFUSRFDFUSRFDFUSPEF
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDPEFPEF

15 cm57.78 ± 4.5357.52 ± 4.9956.80 ± 4.4256.45 ± 4.470.927b0.983b0.789c0.085b
20 cm55.66 ± 4.7755.35 ± 4.9354.96 ± 4.4754.53 ± 4.440.547b0.637b0.776c0.091b
Midpoint54.42 ± 4.2754.23 ± 4.4453.81 ± 4.1053.55 ± 3.880.660b0.666b0.793c0.083b
30 cm48.00 ± 4.0848.04 ± 4.2747.43 ± 3.7747.18 ± 3.820.098a0.389b0.568b0.538c0.196b
40 cm39.96 ± 0.6140.01 ± 2.9239.52 ± 2.6739.35 ± 2.820.156a0.330b0.472b0.632c0.153b
Weight59.27 ± 8.0460.02 ± 8.340.300c0.245b
BMI22.20 ± 2.5321.35 ± 5.60.709d0.100e

N: sample; BMI: body mass index; SD: standard deviation; RFD: radiofrequency diathermy; FUS: focused ultrasound therapy; EF: effect size. aDependent Student’s t-test; bCohen’s d; cindependent Student’s t-test; dMann–Whitney test; erank biserial correlation. Note. Significant results () were shown in bold.