Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 510127, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/510127
Research Article

Securing the Border from Invasives: Robust Inspections under Severe Uncertainty

1Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 80 Campus Center Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
2United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service in Washington, DC 20036, USA

Received 16 March 2010; Accepted 25 May 2010

Academic Editor: Yew-Kwang Ng

Copyright © 2010 L. Joe Moffitt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, “Regulating the Importation of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables,” 2008, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/fv.pdf.
  2. L. J. Moffitt and C. D. Osteen, “Prioritizing invasive species threats under uncertainty,” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. K. Stranlund and Y. Ben-Haim, “Price-based vs. quantity-based environmental regulation under Knightian uncertainty: an info-gap robust satisficing perspective,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 443–449, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Render, R. M. Stair Jr., and M. E. Hanna, Quantitative Analysis for Management, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 10th edition, 2009.
  5. D. W. Katzner, Time, Ignorance, and Uncertainty in Economic Models, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1998.
  6. R. D. Horan, C. Perrings, F. Lupi, and E. H. Bulte, “Biological pollution prevention strategies under ignorance: the case of invasive species,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1303–1310, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, “Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 141–153, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Ben-Haim, Info-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty, Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2nd edition, 2006.
  9. Y. Ben-Haim, “Value at risk with info-gap uncertainty,” Journal of Risk Finance, vol. 6, pp. 388–403, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Carmel and Y. Ben-Haim, “Info-gap robust-satisficing model of foraging behavior: do foragers optimize or satisfice?” American Naturalist, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 633–641, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. S. Halpern, H. M. Regan, H. P. Possingham, and M. A. McCarthy, “Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design,” Ecology Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Moilanen and B. A. Wintle, “Uncertainty analysis favours selection of spatially aggregated reserve networks,” Biological Conservation, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 427–434, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. J. Moffitt, J. K. Stranlundt, and B. C. Field, “Inspections to avert terrorism: robustness under severe uncertainty,” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, vol. 2, no. 3, article 3, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. J. Moffitt, J. K. Stranlund, B. C. Field, and C. D. Osteen, “Robust inspection for invasive species with a limited budget,” in New Approaches in the Economics of Plant Health, A. O. Lansink, Ed., Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  15. L. J. Moffitt, J. K. Stranlund, and C. D. Osteen, “Robust detection protocols for uncertain introductions of invasive species,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 293–299, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Davidovitch, R. Stoklosa, J. Majer et al., “Info-gap theory and robust design of surveillance for invasive species: the case study of Barrow Island,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 2785–2793, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. M. Rout, C. J. Thompson, and M. A. McCarthy, “Robust decisions for declaring eradication of invasive species,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 782–786, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. A. Burgman, B. A. Wintle, C. A. Thompson, A. Moilanen, M. C. Runge, and Y. Ben-Haim, “Reconciling uncertain costs and benefits in bayes nets for invasive species management,” Risk Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. R. Carrasco, R. Baker, A. MacLeod, J. D. Knight, and J. D. Mumford, “Optimal and robust control of invasive alien species spreading in homogeneous landscapes,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 7, no. 44, pp. 529–540, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Yemshanov, F. H. Koch, Y. Ben-Haim, and W. D. Smith, “Robustness of risk maps and survey networks to knowledge gaps about a new invasive pest,” Risk Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 261–276, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Vinot, S. Cogan, and V. Cipolla, “A robust model-based test planning procedure,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. 571–585, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. D. Osteen, E. B. Bradley, and L. J. Moffitt, The Economics of Agricultural Pest Control: An Annotated Bibliography, 1960—1980, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture Series no. 14, 1981.
  23. J. M. White, P. G. Allen, L. J. Moffitt, and P. P. Kingsley, “Economic analysis of an areawide program for biological control of the alfalfa weevil,” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 173–179, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison, “Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States,” BioScience, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Perrings, M. Williamson, and S. Dalmazzone, Eds., The Economics of Biological Invasions, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2000.
  26. J. F. Shogren, “Risk reduction strategies against the ‘explosive invader’,” in The Economics of Biological Invasions, M. Perrings, M. Williamson, and S. Dalmazzone, Eds., pp. 56–69, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  27. C. Brown, L. Lynch, and D. Zilberman, “The economics of controlling insect-transmitted plant diseases,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 279–291, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. B. Barbier and J. F. Shogren, “Growth with endogenous risk of biological invasion,” in Proceedings of the 77th Annual Western Agricultural Economic Association International Conference, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2002.
  29. M. E. Eiswerth and G. C. Van Kooten, “Uncertainty, economics, and the spread of an invasive plant species,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1317–1322, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. H. Endress, “Terrorism and the economics of biological invasions,” in Proceedings of the 77th Annual Western Agricultural Economic Association International Conference, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2002.
  31. B. Kaiser and J. Roumasset, “Optimal public control of exotic species: preventing the brown tree snake from invading Hawaii,” in Proceedings of the 77th Annual Western Agricultural Economic Association International Conference, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2002.
  32. L. J. Olson and S. Roy, “The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1311–1316, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Perrings, M. Williamson, E. B. Barbier et al., “Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective,” Conservation Ecology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Settle and J. F. Shogren, “Modeling native-exotic species within Yellowstone Lake,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1323–1328, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. McAusland and C. Costello, “Avoiding invasives: trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 954–977, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. V. Surkov, A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink, O. van Kooten, and W. van der Werf, “A model of optimal import phytosanitary inspection under capacity constraint,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 363–373, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Ben-Haim and K. W. Hipel, “The graph model for conflict resolution with information-gap uncertainty in preferences,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 126, no. 2-3, pp. 319–340, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Unpublished Plant Protection and Quarantine-280 data, 2008.
  39. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Unpublished Agricultural Quarantine Inspection Monitoring data, 2008.
  40. United States Government Accountability Office, “Federal User Fees: Substantive Reviews Needed to Align Port-Related Fees with the Programs They Support,” GAO-08-321, February 2008.
  41. United States Government Accountability Office, “Agricultural Quarantine Inspection: Management Problems May Increase Vulnerability of U.S. Agriculture to Foreign Pests and Diseases,” GAO-08-96T, October 2007.
  42. United States Government Accountability Office, “Homeland Security: Much Is Being Done to Protect Agriculture from a Terrorist Attack, but Important Challenges Remain,” GAO-05-214, March 2005.
  43. United States General Accounting Office, “Agricultural Inspection: Improvements Needed to Minimize Threat of Foreign Pests and Diseases,” GAO/RCED-97-102, May 1997.