Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2012, Article ID 691302, 11 pages
Research Article

Unilateral Trade Preferences in the EU: An Empirical Assessment for the Case of Mozambican Exports

1Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE, UK
2Independent Consultant, Via Passo Bocco 1, Parma, Italy

Received 4 August 2011; Revised 21 September 2011; Accepted 13 October 2011

Academic Editor: Priya Ranjan

Copyright © 2012 Xavier Cirera and Andrea Alfieri. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Hoekman and C. Ozden, “Trade preferences and differential treatment of developing countries: a selective survey,” Working Paper 3566, World Bank Policy Research, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. W. Singer, “U.S. foreign investment in underdeveloped areas: the distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries,” American Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 473–485, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. Prebisch, “The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems,” in Economic Bulletin for Latin America, vol. 7, pp. 1–22, CEPAL, Santiago, Chile, 1962, (first published in 1950). View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Carrere and J. de Melo, “Are rules of origin equally costly? Estimates from NAFTA,” in Paper Presented at IDB Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  5. O. Cadot, J. de Melo, and A. P. Portugal-Perez, “Rules of origin for preferential trading arrangements,” Working Paper 4016, World Bank Policy Research, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Hoekman, W. Martin, and C. A. Primo Braga, “Preference erosion: the terms of the debate,” in Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues, R. Newfarmer, Ed., pp. 329–340, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Olarreaga and C. Özden, “AGOA and Apparel: who captures the tariff rent in the presence of preferential market access?” World Economy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Özden and G. Sharma, “Price effects of preferential market access: the Caribbean Basin Initiative and the apparel sector,” Working Paper 3244, World Bank Policy Research, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  9. UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics 2006-2007, 2007.
  10. A. S. Hadi, “A new measure of overall potential influence in linear regression,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Alfieri and X. Cirera, “Unilateral trade preferences in the EU: an empirical assessment for the case of Mozambican exports,” DNEAP Discussion Paper 60E, Maputo, Mozambique, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. K. Schott, “Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 647–678, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Brenton, “Integrating the least developed countries into the world trading system: the current impact of European Union preferences under “Everything but arms”,” Journal of World Trade, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 623–646, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Manchin, “Preference utilization and tariff reduction in EU imports from ACP countrie,” Working Paper 3688, World Bank Policy Research, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Mold, “Trade preferences and Africa: the state of play and the issues at stake,” ATPC UN Economic Commission for Africa, 2005.
  16. OECD, “Assessment of utilization and motive for under-utilization of preferences in selected LDCs,” October Joint Working Party on Agricultural Trade, COM/AGR/TD/WP(2004)12/REV2, 2004.