Research Article
Optimal Waist Circumference Cut-Off Point for Multiple Risk Factor Aggregation: Results from the Maracaibo City Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence Study
Table 3
Waist circumference cutpoints for abdominal obesity and BMI according to ethnic groups, Maracaibo, 2014.
| | Ethnic groups* | | Mixed race | Hispanic whites | Afro-Venezuelan | Amerindian |
| Females | | | | |
| WC cut-offs point (cm) | 90.25 | 90.5 | 91.5 | 85.5 | AUC (CI 95%) | 0.713 (0.676–0.751) | 0.679 (0.595–0.762) | 0.653 (0.423–0.882) | 0.835 (0.704–0.965) | Sensitivity (%) | 68 | 68.1 | 75 | 75 | Specificity (%) | 67.8 | 54.8 | 50 | 74.1 | Youden Index | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.49 | Distance to ROC | 0.454 | 0.553 | 0.559 | 0.359 | LR+ | 2.111 | 1.507 | 1.5 | 2.896 | BMI (Kg/m2)* | 27.6 ± 6.3 | 28.5 ± 6.4 | 28.9 ± 5.7 | 25.9 ± 5.3 |
| Males | | | | |
| WC cut-offs point (cm) | 95.15 | 95.5 | 91.25 | 89.5 | AUC (CI 95%) | 0.737 (0.701–0.773) | 0.783 (0.707–0.860) | 0.821 (0.665–0.976) | 0.729 (0.538–0.920) | Sensitivity (%) | 71.1 | 78.9 | 81.3 | 90 | Specificity (%) | 65.8 | 67.2 | 80 | 70.8 | Youden Index | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.61 | Distance to ROC | 0,448 | 0.390 | 0.274 | 0.309 | LR+ | 2.079 | 2.405 | 4.065 | 3.082 | BMI (Kg/m2)** | 28.9 ± 6.4 | 29.2 ± 5.6 | 27.3 ± 7.4 | 25.6 ± 4.6 |
|
|
Youden Index = Sensitivity + Specificity − 1. LR+ = (positive likelihood ratio). BMI = Body Mass Index. *One way-ANOVA = 0.076. **One way-ANOVA = 0.011: Post Hoc Tukey: mixed race versus Amerindian: = 0.018; Hispanic whites versus Amerindian: = 0.015.
|