Research Article | Open Access

Paul Bracken, "An Intrinsic Characterization of Bonnet Surfaces Based on a Closed Differential Ideal", *Geometry*, vol. 2014, Article ID 715679, 11 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/715679

# An Intrinsic Characterization of Bonnet Surfaces Based on a Closed Differential Ideal

**Academic Editor:**Chandrashekar Devchand

#### Abstract

The structure equations for a two-dimensional manifold are introduced and two results based on the Codazzi equations pertinent to the study of isometric surfaces are obtained from them. Important theorems pertaining to isometric surfaces are stated and a theorem due to Bonnet is obtained. A transformation for the connection forms is developed. It is proved that the angle of deformation must be harmonic, and that the differentials of many of the important variables generate a closed differential ideal. This implies that a coordinate system exists in which many of the variables satisfy particular ordinary differential equations, and these results can be used to characterize Bonnet surfaces.

#### 1. Introduction

Bonnet surfaces in three-dimensional Euclidean space have been of great interest for a number of reasons as a type of surface [1, 2] for a long time. Bonnet surfaces are of nonconstant mean curvature that admit infinitely many nontrivial and geometrically distinct isometries which preserve the mean curvature function. Nontrivial isometries are ones that do not extend to isometries of the whole space . Considerable interest has resulted from the fact that the differential equations that describe the Gauss equations are classified by the type of related PainlevÃ© equations they correspond to and they are integrated in terms of certain hypergeometric transcendents [3â€“5]. Here the approach first given by Chern [6] to Bonnet surfaces is considered. The developement is accessible with many new proofs given. The main intention is to end by deriving an intrinsic characterization of these surfaces which indicates they are analytic. Moreover, it is shown that a type of Lax pair can be given for these surfaces and integrated. Several of the more important functions such as the mean curvature are seen to satisfy nontrivial ordinary differential equations.

Quite a lot is known about these surfaces. With many results the analysis is local and takes place under the assumptions that the surfaces contain no umbilic points and no critical points of the mean curvature function. The approach here allows the elimination of many assumptions and it is found that the results are not too different from the known local ones. The statements and proofs have been given in great detail in order to help illustrate and display the interconnectedness of the ideas and results involved.

To establish some information about what is known, consider an oriented, connected, smooth open surface in with nonconstant mean curvature function . Moreover, admits infinitely many nontrivial and geometrically distinct isometries preserving . Suppose that is the set of umbilic points of and is the set of critical points of . Many global facts are known with regard to , , and , and a few will now be mentioned. The set consists of isolated points, even if there exists only one nontrivial isometry preserving the mean curvature; moreover, [7, 8]. Interestingly, there is no point in at which all order derivatives of are zero, and cannot contain any curve segment. If the function by which a nontrivial isometry preserving the mean curvature rotates the principal frame is considered, as when there are infinitely many isometries, this function is a global function on continuously defined [9â€“11]. As first noted by Chern [6], this function is harmonic. The analysis will begin by formulating the structure equations for two-dimensional manifolds.

#### 2. Structure Equations

Over there exists a well defined field of orthonormal frames which is written as , , , such that , is the unit normal at and , are along principal directions [12]. The fundamental equations for have the form Differentiating each of these equations in turn, results in a large system of equations for the exterior derivatives of the and the , as well as a final equation which relates some of the forms [13]. This choice of frame and Cartanâ€™s lemma allows for the introduction of the two principal curvatures which are denoted by and at by writing Suppose that in the following. The mean curvature of is denoted by and the Gaussian curvature by . They are related to and as follows: The forms which appear in (1) satisfy the fundamental structure equations which are summarized here [14], The second pair of equations of (4) is referred to as the Codazzi equation and the last equation is the Gauss equation.

Exterior differentiation of the two Codazzi equations yields Cartanâ€™s lemma can be applied to the equations in (5). Thus there exist two functions and such that Subtracting the pair of equations in (6) gives an expression for Define the variable to be It will appear frequently in what follows. Equation (7) then takes the form The constitute a linearly independent set. Two related coframes called and can be defined in terms of the and the functions and as follows: These relations imply that is tangent to the level curves specified by equals constant and is its symmetry with respect to the principal directions.

Squaring both sides of the relation and subtracting the relation yields . The Hodge operator, denoted by , will play an important role throughout. It produces the following result on the basis forms , Moreover, adding the expressions for and given in (6), and the results are Finally, note that Therefore, the Codazzi equations (12) and (13) can be summarized using the definitions of and as

#### 3. A Theorem of Bonnet

Suppose that is a surface which is isometric to such that the principal curvatures are preserved [10â€“12]. Denote all quantities which pertain to with the same symbols but with asterisks, as for example, The same notation will be applied to the variables and forms which pertain to and . When and are isometric, the forms are related to the by the following transformation

Theorem 1. *Under the transformation of coframe given by (16), the associated connection forms are related by
*

*Proof. *Exterior differentiation of produces
Similarly, differentiating gives

There is a very important result which can be developed at this point. In the case that and , the Codazzi equations imply that Apply the operator to both sides of this equation, we obtain Substituting for from Theorem 1, this is

Lemma 2. *Consider
*

*Proof. *This can be shown in two ways. First from (16), express the in terms of the to give
Therefore,
where and .

Lemma 2 also follows from the fact that and (8).

Lemma 3. *Consider
*

*Proof. *

Substituting from Lemma 3 into (22), can be written as Introduce the new variable so and , , hence the following lemma.

Lemma 4. *Consider
*

This is the total differential equation which must be satisfied by the angle of rotation of the principal directions during the deformation. If the deformation is to be nontrivial, it must be that this equation is completely integrable.

Theorem 5. *A surface admits a nontrivial isometric deformation that keeps the principal curvatures fixed if and only if
**
or .*

*Proof. *Differentiating both sides of Lemma 4 gives
Equating the coefficients of to zero gives the result (30).

This theorem seems to originate with Chern [6] and is very useful because it gives the exterior derivatives of the . When the mean curvature is constant, , hence it follows from (14) that . This implies that , and so and must vanish. Hence which implies that, since the are linearly independent, equals a constant. Thus, we arrive at a theorem originally due to Bonnet.

Theorem 6. *A surface of constant mean curvature can be isometrically deformed preserving the principal curvatures. During the deformation, the principal directions rotate by a fixed angle.*

#### 4. Connection Form Associated to a Coframe and Transformation Properties

Given the linearly independent one-forms , , the first two of the structure equations uniquely determine the form . The , are called the orthonormal coframe of the metric and the connection form associated with it.

Theorem 7. *Suppose that is a function on . Under the change of coframe,
**
the associated connection forms are related by
*

*Proof. *The structure equations for the transformed system are given as
Using (33) to replace the in these, we obtain
The set of satisfies a similar system of structure equations, so replacing here yields
Since the forms satisfy the equations and , substituting these relations into the above equations and using , we obtain that in the form
Cartanâ€™s lemma can be used to conclude from these that there exist functions and such that
Finally, apply to both sides and use to obtain
The forms are linearly independent, so for these two equations to be compatible, it suffices to put , and the result follows.

For the necessity in the Chern criterion, Theorem 5, no mention of the set of critical points of is needed. In fact, when is constant, this criterion is met and the sufficiency also holds with constant. However, when is not identically constant, we need to take the set of critical points into account for the sufficiency. In this case, is also an open, dense, and connected subset of . On this subset and the function can be defined in terms of the functions and as To define more general transformations of the , define the angle as This angle which is defined modulo , is continuous only locally and could be discontinuous in a nonsimply connected region of . With and related to and by (42), the forms and can be written in terms of and as

The forms , , and define the same structure on and we let , , and be the connection forms associated to the coframes , ; , ; , . The next Theorem is crucial for what follows.

Theorem 8.

*Proof. *Each of the transformations which yield the and in the form (43) can be thought of as a composition of the two transformations which occur in the Theorems 1 and 7. First apply the transformation and with in (16), we get the equations in (43). Invoking Theorems 1 and 7 in turn, the first result is obtained
The transformation to the is exactly similar except that , hence
This implies that . When replaced in the first equation of (44), the second equation appears. Note that from Theorem 5, , so the second equation can be given as .

Differentiating the second equation in (14) and using , it follows that

Lemma 9. *The angle is a harmonic function and moreover, .*

*Proof. *From Theorem 8, it follows by applying through (44) that
Exterior differentiation of this equation using immediately gives
This states that is a harmonic function. Equation (48) also implies that .

#### 5. Construction of the Closed Differential Ideal Associated with

Exterior differentiation of the first equation in (14) and using the second equation produces The structure equation for the will be needed, From the second equation in (44), we have , and putting this in the first equation of (44) we find Using (52) in (51), Replacing by means of (50) implies the following important result Equation (54) and Cartanâ€™s lemma imply that there exists a function such that This is the first in a series of results which relates many of the variables in question such as , , and directly to the one-form . To show this requires considerable work. The way to proceed is to use the forms in Theorem 5 because their exterior derivatives are known. For an arbitrary function on , define Differentiating (56) and extracting the coefficient of , we obtain In terms of the , , Lemma 9 yields Finally, since , substituting for , we obtain that Differentiating structure equation (51) and using Lemma 9, so, This equation implies that either or is a multiple by a function of the form . Hence, for some function , Substituting the first line of (62) back into the structure equation, we have The second line yields simply . Only the first case is examined now. Substituting (63) into (50), the following important constraint is obtained

Theorem 10. *The function satisfies the equation
*

*Proof. *By substituting into (48) we have
Substituting (66) into (44) and solving for , we obtain that
This can be put in the equivalent form
Taking the exterior product with and using , we get
Imposing the constraint (64), the coefficient of can be equated to zero. This produces the result (65).

As a consequence of Theorem 10, a new function can be introduced such that Differentiating each of these with respect to the basis, we get for that Substituting into (57) and using the fact that satisfies (58) gives the pair of equations This linear system can be solved for and to get By differentiating each of the equations in (73), it is easy to verify that satisfies (57), namely, . Hence there exist harmonic functions which satisfy (65). The solution depends on two arbitrary constants, the values of and at an initial point.

Lemma 11. *Consider
*

*Proof. *It is easy to express the in terms of the ,
Therefore, using (70) and (73), it is easy to see that
Using (70), it follows that
This implies that .

It is possible to obtain formulas for , . Using (75) in (55), the derivatives of can be written down Differentiating each of these in turn, we obtain for , Taking in (57) produces a first equation for the , If another equation in terms of and can be found, it can be solved simultaneously with (80). There exists such an equation and it can be obtained from the Gauss equation in (4) which we put in the form

Solving (44) for , we have The exterior derivative of this takes the form, Putting this in the Gauss equation, Replacing the second derivatives from (79), we have the required second equation Solving (80) and (85) together, the following expressions for and are obtained Given these results for and , it is easy to produce the following two Lemmas.

Lemma 12. *Consider
*

*Proof. *Substituting (86) into , we get
Moreover,

Lemma 13. *Consider
*

*Proof. *Consider

In the interests of completeness, it is important to verify the following Theorem.

Theorem 14. *The function satisfies (57) provided satisfies both (58) and (64).*

*Proof. *Differentiating and given by (86), the left side of (57) is found to be
To simplify this, (58) has been substituted. Using (75) and , it follows that
Note that the coefficient of in this appears in the compatibility condition. To express it in another way, begin by finding the exterior derivative of ,
Applying the Hodge operator to both sides of this gives, upon rearranging terms,
Consequently, we can write
Therefore, it must be that
It follows that when , (57) finally reduces to the form
The first factor is clearly nonzero, so the second factor must vanish. This of course is equivalent to the constraint (64).

#### 6. Intrinsic Characterization of

During the prolongation of the exterior differential system, the additional variables , , , and have been introduced. The significance of the appearance of the function , is that the process terminates and the differentials of all these functions can be computed without the need to introduce more functions. This means that the exterior differential system has finally closed.

The results of the previous section, in particular the lemmas, can be collected such that they justify the following.

Proposition 15. *The differential system generated in terms of the differentials of the variables , , , and is closed. The variables , , , , and remain constant along the -curves so . Hence, an isometry that preserves must map the , curves onto the corresponding , curves of the associated surface which is isometric to .**Along the , curves, consider the normalized frame,
**
The corresponding coframe and connection form are
**
Then can be expressed as a multiple of and , in terms of , and the differential system can be summarized here:
**
The condition is equivalent to
**
This implies that since is proportional to . Also is equivalent to .**Moreover, is equivalent to the fact that the , -curves can be regarded as coordinate curves parameterized by isothermal parameters. Therefore, along the , -curves, orthogonal isothermal coordinates denoted can be introduced. The first fundamental form of then takes the form,
**
Now suppose we set , then
**
This means such a surface is isometric to a surface of revolution. Since , , (100) implies that . This can be stated otherwise as the principal coordinates are isothermal and so is an isothermic surface.**Since , , , , and are functions of only the variable , this implies that and or and are constant along the -curves where is constant. This leads to the following proposition.*

Proposition 16. *
This is equivalent to the statement that is a Weingarten surface.*

*Proof. *The first result follows from the statement about the coordinate system above. Since and ,
Consequently, the geodesic curvature of each -curve, constant is
which is constant.

To express the in terms of and , start by writing in terms of the and then substituting (104), Subscripts denote differentiation and is used interchangeably. Beginning with and using (108), we have Equating coefficients of differentials, this implies that Solving this as a linear system we obtain , , Noting that and , using (100) the forms can be expressed in terms of , : Substituting from (104) into , Therefore, and so is an increasing function of . Now define the function to be Substituting (114) into (112), the are expressed in terms of as well. The equations (30) in Theorem 5 can easily be expressed in terms of and .

Theorem 17. *Equations (30) are equivalent to the following system of coupled equations in and :
**
Moreover, (115) are equivalent to the following first-order system:
**System (116) can be thought of as a type of Lax pair. Moreover, (116) implies that is harmonic as well. Differentiating with respect to and with respect to , it is clear that satisfies Laplaceâ€™s equation in the variables . This is another proof that is harmonic.*

Theorem 18. *The function satisfies the following second-order nonlinear differential equation:
**
There exists a first integral for this equation of the following form:
*

*Proof. *Equation (117) is just the compatibility condition for the first-order system (116). The required derivatives are
Equating derivatives , the required (117) follows.

Differentiating both sides of (118) we get
Isolating from (118) and substituting it into (120), (117) appears.

It is important to note that the function which appears when the differential ideal closes can be related to the function .

Corollary 19.

*Proof. *Using from (101) in Lemma 13, in the , coordinates
Hence using (116), this implies that , hence . The second equation in (116) for implies that . Replacing , this equation simplifies to the form (121).

#### 7. Integrating the Lax Pair System

It is clear that the first order equation in (116) for is separable and can be integrated. The integral depends on whether is zero or nonzero: Here, and is the last constant of integration. Taking specific choices for the constants, for example, when and , the set of solutions (123) for can be summarized below: It is presumed that other choices of the constants can be geometrically eliminated in favor of (124). The solutions (124) are then substituted back into linear system (116). The first equation in (116) implies that either of the two cases Substitute into the second equation in (116). It implies that and give . In both cases is a solution which already appears in (124).

For the second case in (125), the equation can be put in the form Integrating we have for some function to be determined, Therefore, can be obtained by substituting for for each of the three cases in (124). The upper sign holds for and the lower sign holds if .(i), , and (ii), , and (iii), , and In case (ii), if and then , , and if and , then , .

It remains to integrate the second equation of the Lax pair (116) using solutions for both and . The first case (i) is not hard and will be shown explicitly here. The others can be done, and more complicated cases are considered in the Appendix.

(i) Consider and . The second equation in (116) simplifies considerably to ; therefore,

For and , the second equation of (116) becomes ; therefore,

#### 8. A Third Order Equation for and Fundamental Forms

Since , using (104) can be written as Using (14) and (112) for , it follows that When the are put in the , coordinates, using , it can be stated that and . Consequently, simplifies to First order system (116) permits this to be written using as Hence there exists a constant independent of such that or This result (137) for is substituted into the Gauss equation