Table of Contents
Game Theory
Volume 2015, Article ID 570639, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/570639
Review Article

Hypergame Theory: A Model for Conflict, Misperception, and Deception

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7765, USA

Received 24 May 2015; Accepted 9 July 2015

Academic Editor: Tonu Puu

Copyright © 2015 Nicholas S. Kovach et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Funk and Wagnells Standard Dictionary, Conflict, Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Toronto, Canada, 1974.
  2. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions, vol. 2 of North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, edited by A. P. Sage, North-Holland, 1984.
  3. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, A Course in Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1994. View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Peterson, An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
  5. M. J. Osborne, An Introduction to Game Theory, Oxford University Press, 2004.
  6. W. R. Reitman, Cognition and Thought, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  7. P. Bennett, “Toward a theory of hypergames,” Omega, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 749–751, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Kopp, “Shannon, hypergames and information warfare,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Information Warfare & Security Conference (IWAR '02), W. Hutchinson, Ed., Perth, Australia, November 2002.
  9. K. W. Hipel and A. Dagnino, “A hypergame algorithm for modeling misperceptions in bargaining,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 27, pp. 131–152, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Wang, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Solution concepts in hypergames,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 147–171, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Sasaki, N. Kobayashi, and K. Kijima, “Mixed extension of hypergames and its application to inspection games,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ISSS, vol. 777, pp. 1–9, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
  12. R. J. Weber, “Noncooperative games,” in Game Theory and Its Applications, vol. 24 of Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, pp. 83–125, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Department of Defense, Joint Doctrine for Information Operations, Joint Publication, 1998.
  14. M. O. Giesen, The hypergame model—a critical examination using case-studies [BSc. Dissertation], Department of Operational Research, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, 1978.
  15. P. G. Bennett and M. R. Dando, “Fall Gelb and other games: a hypergame perspective of the fall of France, 1940,” Journal of the Conflict Research Society, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. G. Bennett and M. R. Dando, “Complex strategic analysis: a hypergame study of the fall of France,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. M. O. Giesen and P. G. Bennett, “Aristotle's fallacy: a hypergame in the oil shipping business ...,” Omega, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 309–320, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. M. Wright, M. C. Shupe, N. M. Fraser, and K. W. Hipel, “A conflict analysis of the Suez Canal invasion of 1956,” Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. C. Shupe, W. M. Wright, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Nationalization of the Suez Canal: a hypergame analysis,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 477–493, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. G. Bennett, M. R. Dando, and R. G. Sharp, “Using hypergames to model difficult social issues: an approach to the case of soccer hooliganism,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 621–635, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Conflict analysis and bargaining,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, pp. 225–229, IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, Cambridge, Mass, USA, October 1980.
  22. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Computer analysis of a labor-management conflict,” Tech. Rep. 71-SM270880, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  23. P. G. Bennett, “Bidders and dispenser: manipulative hypergames in a multinational context,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 293–306, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. P. G. Bennett, C. S. Huxham, and M. R. Dando, “Shipping in crisis—a trial run for ‘Live’ application of the hypergame approach,” Omega, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 579–594, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Computer assistance in labor-management negotiation,” Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. K. Said and D. A. Hartley, “A hypergame approach to crisis decision-making: the 1973 middle east war,” The Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 937–948, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. P. G. Bennett and M. R. Dando, “The arms race as a hypergame. A study of routes towards a safer world,” Futures, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 293–306, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. M. Fraser, K. W. Hipel, and J. R. del Monte, “Approaches to conflict modeling: a study of a possible USA-USSR nuclear confrontation,” Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 397–417, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. W. Stokes and K. W. Hipel, “Conflict analysis of an export credit trade dispute,” Omega, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 365–376, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Okada, K. W. Hipel, and Y. Oka, “Hypergame analysis of the Lake Biwa conflict,” Water Resources Research, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 917–926, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. W. Hipel, M. Wang, and N. M. Fraser, “Hypergame analysis of the Falkland Island crisis,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, pp. 335–358, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  32. I. Graham, F. O'Doherty, A. McKinnon, and L. Baxter, “Hypergame analysis of the stability of relationships between computerbased logistics systems,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 26, no. 1–3, pp. 303–310, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. R. Vane and P. E. Lehner, “Using hypergames to select plans in adversarial environments,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents, S. Parsons and M. J. Wooldridge, Eds., pp. 103–111, 1999.
  34. R. R. Vane, Using hypergames to select plans in competitive environments [Ph.D. thesis], George Mason University, 2000.
  35. L. Maxime and B. Chaib-draa, Hypergame Analysis in E-Commerce: A Preliminary Report, Scientific Series, CIRANO, 2002.
  36. H. Hamandawana, R. Chanda, and F. Eckardt, “Hypergame analysis and hydroconflicts in the Okavango drainage basin,” Water International, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 538–557, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Novani and K. Kijima, Symbiotic Hypergame Analysis of Value Co-Creation Process in Service System, IEEE, 2010.
  38. J. T. House and G. Cybenko, “Hypergame theory applied to cyber attack and defense,” in Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense IX, E. M. Carapezza, Ed., vol. 7666 of Proceedings of SPIE, Orlando, Fla, USA, May 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. A. S. Gibson, Applied hypergame theory for network defense [M.S. thesis], Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, 2013.
  40. J. Nash, “Equilibrium points in n-person games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 48–49, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. J. F. Nash, “The bargaining problem,” Econometrica, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  42. J. F. Nash, “Two-person cooperative games,” Econometrica, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 128–140, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. J. Nash, “Non-cooperative games,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 286–295, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. J. van Benthem, Logic in Games, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2014.
  45. T. E. Carroll and D. Grosu, “A game theoretic investigation of deception in network security,” in Proceedings of the 18th Internatonal Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN '09), pp. 1–6, IEEE, San Francisco, Calif, USA, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. Zhuang, V. M. Bier, and O. Alagoz, “Modeling secrecy and deception in a multiple-period attacker-defender signaling game,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 409–418, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  47. J. P. Hespanha, Y. S. Ateskan, and H. H. Kizilocak, “Deception in non-cooperative games with partial information,” in Proceedings of the 2nd DARPA-JFACC Symposium on Advances in Enterprise Control, July 2000.
  48. Y. Yavin, “Pursuit-evasion differential games with deception or interrupted observation,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 13, no. 1–3, pp. 191–203, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. O. Hansson, “Decision theory: a brief introduction,” Tech. Rep., Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  50. M. Resnik, Choices—An Introduction to Decision Theory, University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
  51. J. Scott, “Rational choice theory,” in Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present, Sage, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  52. J. O. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, 2nd edition, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  53. J. Baron, Thinking and Deciding, Cambridge University Press, 4th edition, 2007.
  54. S. Grant and T. Van Zandt, “Expected utility theory,” in Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  55. K. Stanovich, Rationality and the Reflective Mind, Oxford University Press, 2010.
  56. R. Hastie and R. M. Dawes, Rational Choice in an Uncertain World—The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, SAGE Publications, 2nd edition, 2009.
  57. H. Rott, “Odd choices: on the rationality of some alleged anomalies of decision and inference,” Topoi, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  58. M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, 1953.
  59. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  60. H. A. Simon, “Theories of bounded rationality,” in Decision and Organization, C. B. McGuire and R. Radner, Eds., pp. 161–176, North-Holland, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  61. H. A. Simon, Models of Man, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  62. B. D. Jones, “Bounded rationality,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 2, pp. 297–321, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. Selten, “What is bounded rationality?” in Proceedings of the Dahlem Conference, SFB Discussion Paper B-454, pp. 1–25, May 1999.
  64. P. G. Bennett, “Beyond game theory-where?” in Analyzing Conflict and Its Resolution, P. G. Bennett, Ed., pp. 43–69, Oxford University Press, London, UK, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  65. P. G. Bennett and R. R. Bussel, “Hypergame theory and methodology: the current ‘state of the art’,” in The Management of Uncertainty: Approaches, Methods and Applications, vol. 32 of NATO ASI Series, pp. 158–181, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. P. G. Bennett and C. S. Huxham, “Hypergames and what they do: a ‘soft O.R.’ approach,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. J. W. Bryant, “Hypermaps: a representation of perceptions in conflicts,” Omega, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 575–586, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. W. Bryant, “Modelling alternative realities in conflict and negotiation,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 985–993, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. R. R. Vane and P. E. Lehner, “Applications of hypergame theory to adversarial planning,” in Proceedings of the JDL Symposium, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif, USA, 1990.
  70. R. R. Vane and P. E. Lehner, “Hypergames and AI in planning,” in Proceedings of the DARPA Research Symposium, San Diego, Calif, USA, September 1990.
  71. M. Wang, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Modeling misperceptions in games,” Behavioral Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 207–223, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. P. G. Bennett, “Hypergames, the development of an approach to modeling conflicts,” Futures, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 489–507, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. R. R. Vane III, “Advances in hypergame theory,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents, Hakodate, Japan, 2006.
  74. R. R. Vane III, “Planning for terrorist-caused emergencies,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC '05), F. B. Armstrong, M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, and J. A. Joines, Eds., Orlando, Fla, USA, December 2005.
  75. M. Bennett and R. R. Vane III, “Using hypergames for deception planning and counter deception analysis,” Defense Intelligence Journal, vol. 15, pp. 117–138, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  76. K. W. Hipel, M. Wang, and N. M. Fraser, “Hypergame analysis of the Falkland/Malvinas conflict,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 335–358, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. C. S. Huxham and P. G. Bennett, “Hypergames and design decisions,” Design Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 227–232, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. M. A. Takahashi, N. M. Fraser, and K. W. Hipel, “A procedure for analyzing hypergames,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  79. M. Wang, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Hypergames—flexible mathematical tools to describe misperceptions in conflicts,” in Proceedings of the Internaional Federation of Automatic Control (UFAC) Workshop on Modeling Decisions and Games with Application to Social Phenomena, Beijing, China, 1986.
  80. M. Wang, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Resolving environmental conflicts having misperceptions,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 163–178, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Dagnino, N. M. Fraser, and K. W. Hipel, “Conflict analysis of an environmental dispute,” in Systems Analysis Applied to Water and Related Land Resources, Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) Conference Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 2–5 October 1985, L. V. Tavares and J. E. Silva, Eds., pp. 253–258, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  82. A. Dagnino, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, “Game theory analysis of a groundwater contamination dispute.,” Journal of the Geological Society of India, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 6–22, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. Y. Sasaki and K. Kijima, “Preservation of misperceptions—stability analysis of hypergames,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS '08), pp. 1–5, July 2008. View at Scopus
  84. R. Vane and P. Lehner, “Using hypergames to increase planned payoff and reduce risk,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 365–380, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. P. G. Bennett, S. Cropper, and C. Huxham, “Modelling interactive decisions: the hypergame focus,” in Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  86. P. G. Bennett, S. Cropper, and C. Huxham, “Using the hypergame perspective: a case study,” in Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, J. Rosenhead, Ed., pp. 315–340, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  87. M. E. Mateski, T. A. Mazzuchi, and S. Sarkani, “The hypergame perception model: a diagrammatic approach to modeling perception, misperception, and deception,” Military Operations Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 21–37, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortes, “Acyclic structure of hypergames and convergence to equilibria,” Games and Economic Behavior, In press.
  89. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortés, “Exploration of misperceptions in hypergames,” in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton '11), pp. 1565–1570, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortes, “Evolution of players' misperceptions in hypergames under perfect observations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1627–1640, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  91. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortés, “Stealthy strategies for deception in hypergames with asymmetric information,” in Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC '11), pp. 5762–5767, December 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortés, “Stealthy deception in hypergames under informational asymmetry,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 785–795, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortés, “Evolution of the perception about the opponent in hypergames,” in Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '10), pp. 1076–1081, Atlanta, Ga, USA, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. B. Gharesifard and J. Cortés, “Learning of equilibria and misperceptions in hypergames with perfect observations,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4045–4050, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2010.
  95. L. Chen and J. Leneutre, “A game theoretical framework on intrusion detection in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 165–178, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. T. Inohara, S. Takahashi, and B. Nakano, “Integration of games and hypergames generated from a class of games,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 423–432, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. Y. X. Song, Z. J. Li, and Y. Q. Chen, “Fuzzy information fusion for hypergame outcome preference perception,” in Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 344 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp. 882–887, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. Y. X. Song, M. Q. Dai, and Y. Cui, “Military conflict decision modeling based on fuzzy hypergame,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management, pp. 410–415, Wuhan, China, 2007.
  99. Y.-X. Song, Y. Qu, Z.-R. Liu, and Y.-Q. Chen, “Fusion and automatic ranking of fuzzy outcome preferences information in hypergame models,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC '05), vol. 5, pp. 2711–2715, August 2005. View at Scopus
  100. Y. Qu, Y. Song, and J. Zhang, “An outcome preference information aggregation model and its algorithm in hypergame situations,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD '08), vol. 4, pp. 494–497, IEEE, Jinan, China, October 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. X. Zeng, Y. Song, and B. Luan, “Interactive integration model of hypergames with fuzzy preference perceptions in multi-conflict situations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS '09), vol. 2, pp. 646–650, IEEE, Shanghai, China, November 2009.
  102. Y. Sasaki and K. Kijima, “Hypergames and Bayesian games: a theoretical comparison of the models of games with incomplete information,” Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 720–735, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  103. B. Chaib-Dara, “Hypergame analysis in multiagent environments,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium, pp. 147–149, Stanford, Calif, USA, March 2001.
  104. C. Huxham and P. Bennett, “Floating ideas—an experiment in enhancing hypergames with maps,” Omega, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 331–347, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. P. Bennett and S. Cropper, “Uncertainty and conflict: combining conflict analysis and strategic choice,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–45, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. J. K. Friend and A. Hickling, Planning under Pressure, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1987.
  107. U. S. Putro, K. Kijima, and S. Takahashi, “Simulation approach to learning problem in hypergame situation by genetic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 260–265, October 1999. View at Scopus
  108. U. S. Putro, K. Kijima, and S. Takahashi, “Simulation of adaptation process in hypergame situation by genetic algorithm,” Systems Analysis Modelling Simulation, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 15–37, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. U. S. Putro, K. Kijima, and S. Takahashi, “Adaptive learning of hypergame situations using a genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 562–572, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. T. Kanazawa, T. Ushio, and T. Yamasaki, “Replicator dynamics of evolutionary hypergames,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 3828–3833, October 2003. View at Scopus
  111. T. Kanazawa and T. Ushio, “Multi-population replicator dynamics with changes of interpretations of strategies,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications (NOLTA '05), Bruges, Belgium, October 2005.
  112. T. Kanazawa, T. Ushio, and T. Yamasaki, “Replicator dynamics of evolutionary hypergames,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A:Systems and Humans, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 132–138, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. B. Stilman, V. Yakhnis, and O. Umanskiy, “Introduction to LG hypergames for practical wargaming,” in Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VI, vol. 4716 of Proceedings of SPIE, p. 386, Orlando, Fla, USA, July 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. B. Stilman, V. Yakhnis, O. Umanskiy, and M. McCrabb, “LG hypergames for effects-based operations,” in Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VII, vol. 5091 of Proceedings of SPIE, September 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. R. Weber, B. Stilman, and V. Yakhnis, “Extension of the LG hypergame to inner games played over the topology of competing mind nets,” in Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science IX, vol. 5805 of Proceedings of SPIE, p. 224, May 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. N. Howard, Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1971. View at MathSciNet
  117. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Solving complex conflicts,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 805–816, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Dynamic modelling of the cuban missile crisis,” Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. R. R. Vane, Hypergame Theory for DTGT Agents, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
  120. The Washington Institute and the Management Sciences for Operations Research, “Feedback,” Newsletter of WINFORMS, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2006, http://www.informs.org/content/download/266804/2524773/file/feedbackvol27no2.pdf. View at Google Scholar
  121. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Computer assistance in conflict analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, pp. 205–209, 1979.
  122. N. M. Fraser and K. W. Hipel, “Computational techniques in conflict analysis,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 181–185, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. R. D. McKelvey, A. M. McLennan, and T. L. Turocy, “Gambit: Software Tools for Game Theory,” 2010, http://www.gambit-project.org/.
  124. L. Brumley, HYPANT: a hypergame analysis tool [Honors thesis], Monash University, 2003.
  125. R. Vane III, “Veridian security policy assistant users manual,” User Manual, 2002. View at Google Scholar