Table of Contents
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

Game Theory
Volume 2015, Article ID 647246, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/647246
Research Article

A Mixed Cooperative Dual to the Nash Equilibrium

Center on Stochastic Modeling, Optimization, & Statistics (COSMOS), The University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19017, Arlington, TX 76019, USA

Received 12 May 2015; Accepted 30 July 2015

Academic Editor: Azhar Iqbal

Copyright © 2015 H. W. Corley. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1944. View at MathSciNet
  2. J. Nash, “Equilibrium points in n-person games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 36, pp. 48–49, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. R. B. Myerson, Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  4. E. Rasmussen, Games and Information, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Mass, USA, 2006.
  5. M. Maschler, E. Solan, and S. Zamir, Game Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. M. Beckenkamp, “A game-theoretic taxonomy of social dilemmas,” Central European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 337–353, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. W. Poundstone, Prisoner's Dilemma, Random House, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  8. C. Berge, Théorie Générale des Jeux à n Personnes, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France, 1957. View at MathSciNet
  9. V. Zhukovskii, “Some problems of nonantagonistic differential games,” in Matematiceskie Metody v Issledovanii Operacij, P. Kenderov, Ed., pp. 103–195, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. Nessah, M. Larbani, and T. Tazdait, “A note on Berge equilibrium,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 926–932, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. K. Y. Abalo and M. M. Kostreva, “Some existence theorems of Nash and Berge equilibria,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 569–573, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Colman, T. W. Körner, O. Musy, and T. Tazdaï, “Mutual support in games: some properties of Berge equilibria,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. O. Musy, A. Pottier, and T. Tazdait, “A new theorem to find Berge equilibria,” International Game Theory Review, vol. 14, no. 1, Article ID 1250005, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. M. Deghdak, “On the existence of Berge equilibrium with pseudocontinuous payoffs,” ROMAII Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. A. Pottier and R. Nessah, “Berge-Vaisman and Nash equilibria: transformation of games,” International Game Theory Review, vol. 16, no. 4, Article ID 1450009, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. H. W. Corley, S. Charoensri, and N. Engsuwan, “A scalar compromise equilibrium for n-person prescriptive games,” Natural Science, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 1103–1107, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Dumas, The Three Musketeers, Penguin Books, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  18. M. Rabin, “Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics,” The American Economic Review, vol. 83, pp. 1281–1302, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Oechssler, “An evolutionary interpretation of mixed-strategy equilibria,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 203–237, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. H. W. Corley and P. Kwain, “A cooperative dual to the Nash equilibrium for two-person prescriptive games,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2014, Article ID 806794, 4 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. S. Kakutani, “A generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 8, pp. 457–459, 1941. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. G. Gottlob, G. Greco, and F. Scarcello, “Pure Nash equilibria: hard and easy games,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 24, pp. 357–406, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. C. Daskalakis, P. W. Goldberg, and C. H. Papadimitriou, “The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 195–259, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. H. W. Corley and P. Kwain, “An algorithm for computing all Berge equilibria,” Game Theory, vol. 2015, Article ID 862842, 2 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Nash, “Non-cooperative games,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 54, pp. 286–295, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet