The Outcomes of Organizational Fairness among Precarious Workers: The Critical Role of Anomie at the Work

Table 6

Testing the hypothesis of the study (emotional exhaustion as a dependent variable).

Variable	Anomie	Anomie	Emotional exhaustion	Emotional exhaustion
	Coeff. ()	{LLCI, ULCI}	Coeff. ()	{LLCI, ULCI}
(1) Age	−0.0064 (0.3199)	{−0.0190, 0.0063}	−0.0155 (0.2374)	{−0.0414, 0.0103}
(2) Gender	0.0812 (0.4782)	{−0.1443, 0.3067}	0.1823 (0.4360)	{−0.2786, 0.6432}
(3) Education	0.0392 (0.4609)	{−0.0654, 0.1438}	0.1960 (0.0721)	{−0.0178, 0.4098}
(4) Marital status	−0.0226 (0.8289)	{−0.2288, 0.1836}	0.0635 (0.7663)	{−0.3574, 0.4843}
(5) Children	0.0511 (0.3179)	{−0.0495, 0.1516}	0.0526 (0.6150)	{−0.1533, 0.2585}
(6) Experience	−0.0020 (0.8473)	{−0.0223, 0.0183}	0.0401 (0.0581)	{−0.0014, 0.0815}
(7) Job position	0.0685 (0.0698)	{−0.0056, 0.1426}	0.1951 (0.0125)	{0.0425, 0.3478}
(8) Contract	−0.0463 (0.1284)	{−0.1061, 0.0135}	−0.0667 (0.2858)	{−0.1896, 0.0562}
(9) Work hour	0.0137 (0.4994)	{−0.0263, 0.0537}	0.0993 (0.0175)	{0.0176, 0.1810}
(10) Bonus	−0.0317 (0.8029)	{−0.2820, 0.2186}	0.4882 (0.0610)	{−0.0227, 0.9992}
(11) Insurance	0.0028 (0.9804)	{−0.2206, 0.2261}	0.3601 (0.1207)	{−0.0957, 0.8160}
(12) Fairness	−0.3087 (0.0000)	{−0.4328, −0.1846}	−0.4429 (0.0015)	{−0.7132, −0.1726}
(13) Anomie			0.3198 (0.0402)	{0.0144, 0.6252}