Research Article
Biliary Leak in Post-Liver-Transplant Patients: Is There Any Place for Metal Stent?
Table 2
Long-term evaluation of SEMS for the treatment of biliary leaks.
| | PCSEMS | FCSEMS with fins | FCSEMS with flare ends |
| N | 3 | 18 | 10 |
| Stent in place (days) | | | | Mean (SD) | 85 (±28) | 152.3 (±117.6) | 106 (±19.7) | Median (range) | 89 (55–110) | 102 (35–427) | 98 (96–139) |
| Stent diameter | | | | 8 mm | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 mm | 3 | 16 | 5 |
| Stent status | | | | Stents removed | 2 (66.7%) | 13 (87%) | 7 (70%) |
| Followup after removal (days) | | | | Mean (SD) | 1636.3 (±495.1) | 797.9 (±261.9) | 189.4 (±83.5) | Median (range) | 1353 (1348–2208) | 849 (323–1111) | 203 (95–305) |
| Long-term success | | | | Intention to treat | 3/3 (100%) | 14/18 (77.8%) | 7/10 (70%) |
| Postplacement complications | | | | Cholangitis | 0 | 1/18 (5.6%) | 0 | Proximal migration | 0 | 1/18 (5.6%) | 0 |
| Postremoval complications | | | | Biliary stricture | 1/3 (33.3%) | 6/18 (35%) | 1/10 (10%) |
|
|
SD: standard deviation.
|