Research Article
Adaptive Weighted Face Alignment by Multi-Scale Feature and Offset Prediction
Table 3
Comparison of results with state-of-the-art methods on the 300W dataset.
| Method | Common | Challenging | Full |
| Inter-pupil normalization (IPN) | RCPR [8] | 6.18 | 17.26 | 8.35 | ESR [30] | 5.28 | 17.00 | 7.58 | LBF [5] | 5.57 | 15.40 | 7.50 | TCDCN [11] | 4.80 | 8.60 | 5.54 | CFSS [4] | 4.73 | 9.98 | 5.76 | 2-SCRM [15] | 4.58 | 10.94 | 5.82 | MAttHG [21] | 3.83 | 7.12 | 4.49 | AWMOP | 4.09 | 7.63 | 4.79 | Inter-ocular normalization (ION) | DSRN [16] | 4.12 | 9.68 | 5.21 | DSCN [17] | 3.58 | 5.36 | 3.85 | LAB [9] | 2.98 | 5.19 | 3.49 | MAttHG [21] | 2.81 | 4.94 | 3.23 | SD-HRNet [34] | 2.94 | 5.33 | 3.41 | AWMOP | 2.95 | 5.28 | 3.41 |
|
|
Bold values represent the best results.
|