Research Article

Worst-Case Morphs Using Wasserstein ALI and Improved MIPGAN

Table 4

Detection performance in BPCER (%) at APCER 5% and 10% (Section 5.1).

Trained withLand-
mark
MIPGANImproved MIPGAN
(Ours)
WALI (Ours) with optimisation using:WALI (Ours) 512  512
baseline
MFNMFN &
El.Face
MFN &
Curr.Face
MFN &
ArcFace
MFN &
Inception
MFN &
PocketNet
MFN &
VGG16

S-MADBPCER@APCER 5%

FRGC3.2100.099.471.566.267.069.270.971.263.981.3
AMSL38.7100.095.254.262.448.845.948.448.042.699.8

BPCER@APCER 10%

FRGC1.4100.098.656.052.250.755.949.845.547.978.8
AMSL26.2100.089.029.538.131.426.526.926.726.999.4

D-MADBPCER@APCER 5%

FRGC0.319.418.57.29.810.212.88.36.78.40.5

BPCER@APCER 10%

FRGC0.212.412.03.55.15.67.34.83.74.20.2

Note. Top = LBP-based S-MAD. Bottom = D-MAD based on FR-difference features.