Research Article
Worst-Case Morphs Using Wasserstein ALI and Improved MIPGAN
Table 4
Detection performance in BPCER (%) at APCER
5% and
10% (Section
5.1).
| Trained with | Land- mark | MIPGAN | Improved MIPGAN (Ours) | WALI (Ours) with optimisation using: | WALI (Ours) 512 512 baseline | MFN | MFN & El.Face | MFN & Curr.Face | MFN & ArcFace | MFN & Inception | MFN & PocketNet | MFN & VGG16 |
| S-MAD | BPCER@APCER 5% |
| FRGC | 3.2 | 100.0 | 99.4 | 71.5 | 66.2 | 67.0 | 69.2 | 70.9 | 71.2 | 63.9 | 81.3 | AMSL | 38.7 | 100.0 | 95.2 | 54.2 | 62.4 | 48.8 | 45.9 | 48.4 | 48.0 | 42.6 | 99.8 |
| | BPCER@APCER 10% |
| FRGC | 1.4 | 100.0 | 98.6 | 56.0 | 52.2 | 50.7 | 55.9 | 49.8 | 45.5 | 47.9 | 78.8 | AMSL | 26.2 | 100.0 | 89.0 | 29.5 | 38.1 | 31.4 | 26.5 | 26.9 | 26.7 | 26.9 | 99.4 |
| D-MAD | BPCER@APCER 5% |
| FRGC | 0.3 | 19.4 | 18.5 | 7.2 | 9.8 | 10.2 | 12.8 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 8.4 | 0.5 |
| | BPCER@APCER 10% |
| FRGC | 0.2 | 12.4 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 7.3 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 0.2 |
|
|
Note. Top = LBP-based S-MAD. Bottom = D-MAD based on FR-difference features.
|