Research Article
Face Forgery Detection with Long-Range Noise Features and Multilevel Frequency-Aware Clues
Table 1
Quantitative comparison results for different quality settings in FF++ dataset.
| Methods | Level | HQ (c23) | LQ (c40) | Metric | Acc | AUC | Acc | AUC |
| Steg. Features [44] | 70.97 | — | 55.98 | — | LD-CNN [45] | 78.45 | — | 58.69 | — | Constrained Conv [46] | 82.97 | — | 66.84 | — | MesoNet [4] | 83.1 | — | 70.47 | — | DSP-FWA [47] | — | 57.49 | — | 62.34 | Face X-ray [48] | — | 87.4 | — | 61.6 | Xception [20] | 94.93 | 97.32 | 83.52 | 86.02 | EfficientNetB4 [39] | 95.84 | 98.31 | 85.14 | 87.12 | Vit [15] | 84.32 | 87.73 | 76.53 | 79.81 | Swin-B [32] | 90.64 | 92.32 | 81.68 | 83.74 | SPSL [27] | 91.5 | 95.32 | 81.57 | 82.82 | GFFD [9] | 96.18 | 98.56 | 86.16 | 87.94 | MADD [7] | 97.12 | 99.05 | 85.78 | 87.31 | Our | 97.37 | 99.34 | 88.21 | 89.84 |
|
|
The best results are marked in bold fonts.
|