Table of Contents
International Journal of Bacteriology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 680983, 6 pages
Research Article

The Frequency of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase Gene Polymorphism in Egypt

Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia 61511, Egypt

Received 29 June 2014; Revised 22 August 2014; Accepted 1 September 2014; Published 24 September 2014

Academic Editor: Gary Dykes

Copyright © 2014 Hend M. Abdulghany and Rasha M. Khairy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The current study aimed to use Coagulase gene polymorphism to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) subtypes isolated from nasal carriers in Minia governorate, Egypt, evaluate the efficiency of these methods in discriminating variable strains, and compare these subtypes with antibiotypes. A total of 400 specimens were collected from nasal carriers in Minia governorate, Egypt, between March 2012 and April 2013. Fifty-eight strains (14.5%) were isolated and identified by standard microbiological methods as MRSA. The identified isolates were tested by Coagulase gene RFLP typing. Out of 58 MRSA isolates 15 coa types were classified, and the amplification products showed multiple bands (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 bands). Coagulase gene PCR-RFLPs exhibited 10 patterns that ranged from 1 to 8 fragments with AluI digestion. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with a panel of 8 antimicrobial agents showed 6 different antibiotypes. Antibiotype 1 was the most common phenotype with 82.7%. The results have demonstrated that many new variants of the coa gene are present in Minia, Egypt, different from those reported in the previous studies. So surveillance of MRSA should be continued.

1. Introduction

MRSA was identified as a hospital acquired pathogen in the 1960s. Infections with community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) have emerged in the 1980s due to the spread of MRSA from hospitals to the community [1]. A highly pathogenic community-acquired organism different from those related to hospitals has emerged since the mid-1990s [2]. The increasing rate of CA-MRSA infections in many areas, coupled with the organism’s unique pattern of virulence, clinical picture, and antimicrobial resistance, has important implications for treatment and infection control measures and acts as a serious challenge for the clinician [3]. The differentiation between CA-MRSA and hospital acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) is becoming so difficult, since CA-MRSA could spread in hospitals [4].

Colonization is the first stage in the pathogenesis of MRSA infection. About 20% of people are considered as permanent carriers of S. aureus, mainly in the anterior nares and skin, and also axila, throat, intestine, perineum, and rectum may be colonized with S. aureus. About 30% of people are transient carriers, and 5 to 7% of them are colonized with MRSA [5].

Naturally S. aureus has shown variable genome structure that is associated with the variable strains in certain areas; those are responsible for the emerging of different epidemiologic profiles. Identification and subtyping of such strains is very important to apply suitable infection control programs tocontrol MRSAspread [6]. Both phenotyping and genotyping can be used to identify MRSA, and it is found that the cefoxitin disk diffusion test was 100% sensitive and specific for detection of MRSA [7]. Also various molecular typing techniques have been used, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and these assays were considered as efficient techniques in MRSA typing but they are time consuming, expensive, and technically complex [8].

All strains of S. aureus produce coagulase enzyme, and its production can identify S. aureus infections [9]. DNA sequence analysis of the 3′-end of the Coagulase (coa) gene revealed heterogeneity in the 81 bp tandem repeats region that encoding repeated 27-amino-acid sequences in the C-terminal region. PCR amplification of this region showed DNA bands of different size and number that could be further differentiated by using restriction enzyme AluI [10]. Therefore, this assay is considered a simple and accurate subtyping method of S. aureus [11] and can be included in epidemiological studies and routine infection control programs [8].

The aim of this study was to use coa gene polymorphism to identify MRSA subtypes isolated from nasal carriers in Minia governorate, Upper Egypt, evaluate the efficiency of these typing methods in discriminating variable strains, and compare these subtypes with antibiotypes.

2. Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

A total of 400 specimens were collected from anterior nares of Egyptian carriers: two hundred from rural residents who are in contact with animals and 200 specimens from urban residents, between March 2012 and April 2013. One hundred fourteen (28.5%) isolates were identified as staphylococci, and fifty eight strains identified as S. aureus (32 from rural residents and 26 from urban residents) by standard microbiological methods including Gram stain, catalase, slide and tube coagulase test, DNase test, growth on mannitol salt agar, and complete hemolysis on blood agar [12].

2.2. Identification of MRSA

All S. aureus isolates were subjected to cefoxitin disc diffusion test to identify MRSA. Mueller-Hinton Agar plates were inoculated with 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of the isolates, and 30 μg cefoxitin antibiotic disks were placed and incubated for 24 h at 37°C [13]. Zone diameters were measured and interpreted according to the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute [14]. Fifty-eight (100%) strains were identified as MRSA and kept frozen at –20°C in brain heart infusion broth containing 15% glycerol for further identification.

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The sensitivity of MRSA isolates was examined by disk diffusion method based on CLSI guide direction, against antibiotics including vancomycin (30 μg), ofloxacin (10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), amikacin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), and clindamycin (2 μg) (Bioanalyse).

2.4. DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from the study samples and two isolates of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) that were included as negative control using genomic BYF DNA extraction Mini Kit (Intron Biotechnology, Korea); according to the manufacturer’s instructions, DNA was stored at –20°C.

2.5. DNA Amplification

The 3′-end region of the coa gene was amplified by PCR using the following primer set [10]: forward: 5′CGAGACCAAGATTCAACAAG; the reverse: 5′AAAGAAAACCACTCACATCA 3′ (Biosearch Technologies). PCR was performed in a 50 μL reaction mixture, containing 3 μL of template DNA (approximately 300 ng/μL) and 25 μL of PCR master mix (DreamTaq TM Green Master Mix (2X), Fermentas). It is a ready-to-use solution containing DreamTaq TM DNA polymerase, optimized DreamTaq TM Green buffer (2X), 4 mM MgCl and dNTPs (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and 2dTTP, 0.4 mM each), and 2 μL (20 pmol) of each primer and 18 μL of nuclease-free water. The reaction was carried out in a thermocycler (TECHINE TC 512) as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 45 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

2.6. Analysis of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)

Restriction analysis of the PCR products was performed with AluI enzyme (Thermo Scientific Fast Digest), according to the manufacturer’s instructions as follows: 10 μL of PCR products, 1 μL of Fast Digest enzyme, 2 μL of green buffer, and 17 μL of nuclease-free water at 37°C for 15 minutes. The PCR products and RFLP fragments were identified by electrophoresis through 2% and 3% agarose gel using 100 bp ladder (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH) and 50 bp ladder (QIAGEN Gelpilot), respectively.

2.7. Reproducibility Testing

PCR reproducibility was determined by testing 5 different isolates, for 5 consecutive days, and (coa-RFLP) reproducibility by analyzing 8 PCR products 3 times by AluI digestion.

2.8. Determination of Numerical Index of Discrimination

The discriminatory power of the typing method was determined according to the index described by Hunter and Gaston, 1988 [15]. The following formula is used: where = discriminatory index, = the total number of different types, = the number of each type isolates, and = the total number of isolates.

3. Results

3.1. Antibiotypes

Six different antibiotypes (Ant 1–6) were identified in 58 different MRSA isolates using a panel of 8 antimicrobial agents (Table 1). Antibiotype 1 was the most common antibiotype, found in 82.7% of the isolates, and antibiotypes 2–6 were found in sporadic cases.

Table 1: Susceptibility of antimicrobials.
3.2. Coagulase Gene Typing

The coa gene was amplified in 58 different MRSA isolates from human nasal carriers and 2 MRCoNS strains. The size of the products ranged from approximately 80 to 810 bps, and these products showed 15 different types of band patterns as shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) and Table 2. Three MRSA isolates showed one band approximately 130 bp, eight isolates showed 2 bands that ranged approximately from 110 to 650 bps, eleven isolates had 3 bands approximately from 80 to 650 bps, fifteen isolates had 4 bands that ranged approximately from 80 to 650 bps, nine isolates had 5 bands that ranged approximately from 80 to 810 bps, and seven isolates showed 8 bands that ranged approximately from 80 to 650 bps. MRCoNS isolates and 4 isolates, identified as Coagulase positive by coagulase test, were found to be negative with PCR, so molecular detection of S. aureus strains is very important, and the typability by coa gene amplification was about 93% amongst the study isolates.

Table 2: Frequency of coagulase genotypes in the MRSA isolates.
Figure 1: (a) Electrophoretic agarose gel images of coa gene PCR products of MRSA. Lane 1: 100 bp ladder, lane 2: C13: 5 bands (80, 110, 240, 320, and 810 bp), lane 3: C14: 8 bands (80, 110, 180, 240, 260, 320, 400, and 650 bp), lane 4: C1: 1 band (130 bp), lane 5: C8: 4 bands (80, 240, 400, and 650 bp), lane 6: C5: 3 bands (110, 240, and 320 bp), lane 7: C11: 5 bands (110, 180, 240, 320, and 650 bp), lane 8: C4: 2 bands (110 and 240 bp), lane 9 (negative control), lane 10: C6: 3 bands (80, 240, and 650 bp), and lanes 11 and 12: C15: 8 bands (110, 160, 180, 240, 320, 400, 480, and 650). (b) Lane 13: ladder, lane 14: C7: 3 bands (240, 160, and 80), lane 15: no product, lane 16: C12: 5 bands (650, 400, 240, 160, and 80), lane 17: C9: 4 bands (650, 200, 160, and 80), lane 18: C2: 2 bands (240 and 160), lane 19: C3: 2 bands (650 and 240), and lane 20: C10: 4 bands (650, 240, 160, and 80).
3.3. Restriction Fragment Patterns

The numbers of AluI RFLP patterns and genotype frequency are shown in Table 2. Ten different RFLP banding patterns were produced and typed as A1–A10. The isolates with one amplicon gave one pattern of digestion with 1 restriction fragment (80 bp), whereas those with 2 amplicons gave the same pattern of digestion with 2 fragments (240, 110 bp), and the isolates with 3 amplicons also gave the same pattern of digestion with 4 fragments (240, 160, 110, and 80 bp). The isolates with 4 amplicons gave 3 different patterns of digestion with 5 to 7 restriction fragments, and those with 5 amplicons gave 3 different patterns of digestion with 5 to 7 restriction fragments, whereas the isolates with 8 amplicons gave 2 different patterns of digestion with 6 and 7 restriction fragments (Figure 2 and Table 2). One isolate with 2 PCR amplicons did not show any restriction cut with AluI. This probably indicates the absence of AluI restriction site; therefore, AluI RFLP typability was 98% amongst these isolates.

Figure 2: Electrophoretic agarose gel images of AluI restriction fragments of PCR products. Lane 1: 50 bp ladder, lane 2: A5 (7 fragments), lane 3: A1 (1 fragment), lane 4: A10 (6 fragments), lane 5: A8 (5 fragments), lane 6: A6 (7 fragments), lane 7: a ladder, lane 8: A9 (7 fragments), lane 9: A3 (4 fragments), lane 10: A7 (5 bands), lane 11: A2 (2 fragments), and lane 12: A4 (6 fragments).

The correlation between the genotypes, antibiotypes, and the source of the study isolates is summarized in Table 3 that shows variable coa types belong to the same antibiotype, C5 is present in 27% of MRSA isolates from urban residents, C8, C9, and C10 are predominant genotypes (46.9%) of MRSA isolates from rural residents, and C12 is isolated from rural and urban residents that suggest the source of the strain may be the contact with animals.

Table 3: Correlations between antibiotypes, PCR-based types, and source of strains.

Reproducibility of the PCR products and AluI RFLP was detected with 100% of the repeatedly tested isolates. The amplicons were reproducible, although there was some variation in intensity of the bands.

The discriminatory index for the PCR-based typing and the AluI RFLP methods was about 0.93 and 0.90, respectively, which is a good result, so these methods are considered as efficient molecular typing methods.

4. Discussion

Typing of S. aureus by coa gene amplification has been considered to be technically simple, specific, and reproducible genotyping method [16] and effective in tracking the spread of infections so it can shorten or prevent an epidemic and determine the source of infection that decreases the morbidity and mortality rates [8].

In the current study, MRSA strains were 14.5% carriage and 100% of S. aureus isolates that disagreed with most of the previous studies (Brannon et al., 2009) [5] that reported that 7.5% MRSA carriage and 25% of S. aureus strains were MRSA. Tiwari et al., 2008 [17], also reported different results that 64% of S. aureus strains in his study were identified as MRSA.

This study has reported 4 different antibiotypes and showed 100% sensitivity to vancomycin and variable response to different antibiotics that agreed with most of the previous studies, [5, 18].

Previously, coa gene amplification was reported to produce single-banded PCR products in S. aureus strains isolated from human and animal samples, and double-banded products also have been detected [10, 19, 20], but this was a rare finding. After that, double and triple bands from human samples were reported [17]. Triple bands were also reported in Egypt [21] from human and animal samples.

The current study has reported a completely different finding: multiple bands amplification products (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and eight bands) were detected. According to these findings the studied strains were classified as 15 coa PCR types, and this agreed partly with E. R. da Silva and N. da Silva [20], who reported 27 types among 64 isolates, and disagreed with the most of other researchers: Janwithayanuchit et al. [18], who determined 4 different patterns of coa gene in 129 MRSA isolates, Himabindu et al. [8], who reported 3 classes among 85 isolates, Demir et al. [22], who reported 4 patterns in 120 isolates, and Talebi-Satlou et al. [23], who reported 4 products in 26 isolates.

The variability in size and number of coa bands detected in this study may be due to the presence of different allelic forms of coa gene in MRSA, allowing one strain to produce multiple amplicons [10].

This study has reported 10 AluI RFLP patterns amongst 54 isolates, and this was compatible with that reported in Japan, 6 different RFLP banding patterns with AluI, in 35 MRSA isolates [24], and that reported in India, 31 distinct patterns in 85 isolates that indicate MRSA has considerable heterogeneity in the studied group [8]. Our finding disagreed with Demir et al. [22] who reported 7 patterns in 120 isolates. AluI PCR-RFLP fragments in our study varied from one to seven bands, and these results differ from the previous studies, in which AluI PCR-RFLP fragments varied from one to five bands using the same primer sequences [8, 25]. So the current study has reported novel and unique results. One isolate did not show any restriction cut that agreed with the study that has reported no cut in four isolates [8].

We have reported about 93% and 98% typability of coa gene amplification and AluI PCR-RFLP amongst the study isolates, respectively. This agreed to some extent with studies that reported 97% typability [20].

Our study has reported that the discriminatory index of both PCR-based and the AluI RFLP typing methods was about 0.95 and 0.90, respectively. Other studies have reported discriminatory index of 0.92 for PCR amplification, 0.99 for coa-RFLP analysis [18], 0.55 based on PCR product sizes, and 0.96 for AluI typing method [8].

5. Conclusion

This study has shown that MRSA strains colonize the carriers in the studied area harboring different and novel coa genotypes. We would recommend PCR-RFLP typing method as an efficient practical method in infection control programs because of its high discriminatory power and typability that can distinguish between the epidemic and sporadic strains during outbreaks. Further studies should use a large number of isolates and cover more wide areas.

Conflict of Interests

No conflict of interests is declared.


This study was supported by funds from Minia University and personal funds.


  1. H. F. Chambers and F. R. DeLeo, “Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 629–641, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. D. Salgado, B. M. Farr, and D. P. Calfee, “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. M. W. Diederen and J. A. J. W. Kluytmans, “The emergence of infections with community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Infection, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 157–168, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. J. Wannet, M. E. Heck, G. N. Pluister et al., “Panton-valentine leukocidin positive MRSA in 2003: the Dutch situation,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 28–29, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Brannon, R. Denham, and R. E. Rohde, “Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: carriage rates and characterization of students in a Texas university,” Clinical Laboratory Science, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 176–184, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Zecconi and R. Piccinini, “Teoria e prática de controle de mastite por Staphylococcus aureus,” Napgama, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 4–11, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Felten, B. Grandry, P. H. Lagrange, and I. Casin, “Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level MRSA: a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam by Vitek system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2766–2771, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Himabindu, D. S. Muthamilselvan, D. K. Bishi, and R. S. Verma, “Molecular analysis of coagulase gene polymorphism in clinical isolates of methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus by restriction fragment length polymorphism based genotyping,” The American Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 163–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Schlegelová, M. Dendis, J. Benedík, V. Babák, and D. Ryšánek, “Staphylococcus aureus isolates from dairy cows and humans on a farm differ in coagulase genotype,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 327–334, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S.-H. Goh, S. K. Byrne, J. L. Zhang, and A. W. Chow, “Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1642–1645, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. D. Saei and M. Ahmadi, “Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus isolates on the basis of gene coding protein A using PCR-restriction enzyme analysis,” Comparative Clinical Pathology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 645–652, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. F. J. Brown, D. I. Edwards, P. M. Hawkey et al., “Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1000–1018, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Güler, Ü. Ok, K. Gündüz, Y. Gülcü, and H. H. Hadimli, “Antimicrobial susceptibility and Coagulase gene typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis cases in Turkey,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 3149–3154, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Twenty First Informational Supplement, CLSI 2011.M100-S21, Vol. 31, no 1, 2011.
  15. P. R. Hunter and M. A. Gaston, “Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2465–2466, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Karahan and B. Çetinkaya, “Coagulase gene polymorphisms detected by PCR in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from subclinical bovine mastitis in Turkey,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 428–431, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. K. Tiwari, D. Sapkota, A. Gaur, J. P. Mathuria, A. Singh, and M. R. Sen, “Molecular typing of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Northern India using coagulase gene PCR-RFLP,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 467–473, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Janwithayanuchit, S. Ngam-ululert, P. Paungmoung, and W. Rangsipanuratn, “Epidemiologic study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by coagulase gene polymorphism,” ScienceAsia, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Schwarzkopf and H. Karch, “Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus coagulase genes: potential and limits for use as epidemiological marker,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2407–2412, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. R. da Silva and N. da Silva, “Coagulase gene typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cows with mastitis in southeastern Brazil,” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 260–264, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. A. Gharib, M. A. A. Attica, and M. M. Bendary, “Detection of the Coa Gene in Staphylococcus aureus from different sources by polymerase chain reaction,” International Journal of Microbiological Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Demir, Ö. Aslantaş, N. Duran, S. Ocak, and B. Özer, “Investigation of toxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in Mustafa Kemal University Hospital,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 343–352, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Talebi-Satlou, M. Ahmadi, and H. D. Saei, “Restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping of human Staphylococcus aureus isolates from two hospitals in Urmia region of Iran using the coa gene,” Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 416–420, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Mitani, A. Koizumi, R. Sano et al., “Molecular typing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by PCR-RFLP and its usefulness in an epidemiological study of an outbreak,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 250–252, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Ö. Aslantaş, C. Demir, H. TürütoğLu, Z. Cantekin, Y. Ergün, and G. Doğruer, “Coagulase gene polymorphism of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from subclinical bovine mastitis,” Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 253–257, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus