A Spatial Analysis of Serotine Bat (Eptesicus serotinus) Roost Location and Landscape Structure: A Case Study in Sussex, UK

Table 2

Comparison between roost (𝑛=97) and control (𝑛=100) of distances (metres) to landscape features. Adjusted using Bonferroni correction for nine comparisons between roosts and controls.

	Median
	Roost	Control	𝑃 value
Distance to linear feature > 100 m (m)	22	32	0.030
Distance to arable land (m)	60	65	0.727
Distance to improved grassland (m)	70	50	0.333
Distance to unimproved grassland (m)	349	242	0.261
Distance to deciduous woodland (m)	138	177	0.310
Distance to coniferous woodland (m)	899	830	0.588
Distance to woodland (m)	160	182	0.339
Distance to urban areas (m)	919	1011	0.817
Distance to water (m)	270	283	0.681

𝑃<0.00111 is required for 𝛼=0.01^∗∗∗; 𝑃<0.00556 is required for 𝛼=0.05^∗∗.