Association between Different Types of Edible Oils and Anthropometric Indices Mood, and Appetite among Women

Table 9

Appetite, mood, and anthropometric indices in tertiles of vegetable liquid oil and animal fat.

			Tertiles of edible oils
Variable			Tertile of vegetable liquid oil (g/d)			value	Tertile of animal fat (g/d)			value
		Participants	T1: <6	T2: 6–9	T3: >9		T1: <2.08	T2: 2.08–4.48	T3: >4.48
		N = 245	N = 85	N = 81	N = 79		N = 59	N = 78	N = 108
Appetite score	Crude	51.8 (13.2)	52.6 (14)	50.6 (12.2)	52.3 (13.4)	0.579	50.3 (15)	50.8 (10.7)	53.4 (13.8)	0.270
	^1Model 1	—	51.9 (1.4)	51.2 (1.4)	52.4 (1.5)	0.841	50.5 (1.6)	50.2 (1.4)	53.7 (1.2)	0.133
	^2Model 2	—	51.9 (1.42)	50.4 (1.44)	53.2 (1.52)	0.427	51.1 (1.67)	50 (1.47)	53.5 (1.25)	0.198
Mood score	Crude	29.5 (32.6)	30.5 (31.3)	22.6 (27.8)	35.5 (37.4)	0.041	33.1 (36.2)	26.7 (28.5)	29.6 (33.5)	0.527
	^3Model 1	—	32.5 (3.4)	24.8 (3.5)	31.2 (3.6)	0.256	34.2 (4.1)	28 (3.5)	28 (3)	0.427
	^4Model 2	—	32.9 (3.33)	26.1 (3.35)	29.4 (3.55)	0.361	33.7 (3.9)	29.6 (3.47)	27.1 (2.92)	0.415
Overweight and obesity	Crude	24.8 (3.9)	25.1 (3.9)	24.5 (3.6)	24.6 (4.2)	0.675	24.5 (3.9)	25.1 (4.1)	24.7 (3.7)	0.635
	^5Model 1	—	25.3 (0.42)	24.3 (0.42)	24.7 (0.45)	0.293	24.5 (0.50)	25.2 (0.44)	24.6 (0.37)	0.503
	^6Model 2	—	25.1 (0.42)	24.3 (0.43)	24.8 (0.44)	0.458	24.7 (0.50)	25.1 (0.44)	24.5 (0.37)	0.579
Waist circumference	Crude	80 (13)	78.9 (14.4)	80.8 (10.9)	80.4 (13.5)	0.630	78.8 (16.2)	81 (12.8)	79.9 (11.2)	0.611
	^3Model 1	—	78.2 (1.1)	81 (1.1)	80.8 (1.2)	0.188	79.3 (1.3)	80.4 (1.2)	80 (1)	0.835
	^6Model 2	—	79.1 (1.47)	79.8 (1.49)	81.1 (1.53)	0.643	79.4 (1.74)	81 (1.52)	79.6 (1.29)	0.745
Waist-to-height ratio	Crude	0.49 (0.07)	0.48 (0.08)	0.49 (0.06)	0.49 (0.08)	0.705	0.48 (0.09)	0.50 (0.07)	0.49 (0.06)	0.473
	^3Model 1	—	0.49 (0.009)	0.49 (0.009)	0.49 (0.009)	0.879	0.48 (0.010)	0.50 (0.009)	0.49 (0.007)	0.414
	^6Model 2	—	0.48 (0.009)	0.49 (0.009)	0.49 (0.009)	0.743	0.48 (0.010)	0.49 (0.009)	0.49 (0.008)	0.699

The crude model was resulted from one-way ANOVA, and the numbers are reported as mean ± SD. Models 1 and 2 was resulted from covariance analysis, and the numbers are reported as mean ± SE. Model 2 is the main model. P value <0.05 shows a significant level of association. ¹Adjusted for energy, age, COVID-19, and body mass index; ²model 1 + micronutrients (thiamine, niacin, vitamin B12, iron, and zinc), supplements (zinc, multivitamin, iron + vitamin D, iron, iron + multivitamin, zinc + vitamin D, and multivitamin + zinc + omega-3), and macronutrient (fiber, simple sugar); ³adjusted for energy, age, COVID-19, body mass index, and socioeconomic status; ⁴number 3 + micronutrients (thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, B6, folate, vitamin B12, iron, zinc, and magnesium), supplements (vitamin D, zinc, multivitamin, iron + vitamin D, iron, iron + multivitamin, zinc + vitamin D, multivitamin + calcium-D, and multivitamin + zinc + omega-3), and macronutrient (fiber and simple sugar); ⁵adjusted for energy, age, COVID-19, and socioeconomic status; ⁶number 5 + micronutrients (calcium and caffeine), supplements (vitamin D, zinc, multivitamin, calcium, iron + vitamin D, iron, iron + multivitamin, zinc + vitamin D, multivitamin + calcium-D, multivitamin + zinc + omega-3, and iron + calcium), and macronutrient (fiber and simple sugar).