Value of DWI Combined with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Differential Diagnosis between Recurrent Glioma and Radiation Injury: A Meta-Analysis

Li, Hongyi; Duan, Yang; Liu, Na; Dong, Junyi; Liang, Yuanzi; Ju, Ronghui

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1629570

International Journal of Clinical Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1629570 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1629570

Value of DWI Combined with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Differential Diagnosis between Recurrent Glioma and Radiation Injury: A Meta-Analysis

Hongyi Li,^1,2Yang Duan,³Na Liu,^1,2Junyi Dong,^1,2Yuanzi Liang,^1,2and Ronghui Ju^1,2

Academic Editor: Gergely Feher

Received03 Sept 2022

Revised16 Oct 2022

Accepted19 Oct 2022

Published25 Oct 2022

Abstract

To analyse the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr) ratio and Cho/N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) ratio in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the differential diagnosis between recurrent glioma and radiation injury. Chinese and English studies related to the diagnosis of recurrent glioma and radiation injury using DWI and MRS and published before 15 October 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Journal Database, and Wanfang Database for a meta-analysis. A total of 11 articles were included in this study. ADC was lower in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group (standardized mean difference = −1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−1.87, −0.71), ). The Cho/Cr ratio was higher in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group (weighted mean difference = 0.65, 95% CI (0.40, 0.90), and ). The Cho/NAA ratio was higher in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group, as evidenced by the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the Cho/Cr ratio were 0.85 (0.73–0.92) and 0.82 (0.67–0.91), respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.86. The sensitivity and specificity of the Cho/NAA ratio were 0.82 (0.66–0.91) and 0.94 (0.69–0.99), respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.93. This meta-analysis showed that ADC, Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA ratios all had high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, DWI combined with MRS can effectively improve the diagnosis of recurrent glioma and radiation injury.

1. Introduction

Glioma is the most common primary intracranial tumour, and it exhibits infiltrating growth. Therefore, it is often treated with surgical resection, supplemented with postoperative radiotherapy and targeted chemotherapy [1]. Conventional postoperative radiotherapy kills tumour cells and inhibits tumour cell growth while causing brain tissue damage, leading to radiation injury. Clinically, radiation-induced brain injury has become one of the serious complications of radiotherapy. Approximately 20% of patients with glioma will have different degrees of radiation-induced brain injury after radiotherapy. The higher the radiation dose, the earlier the occurrence of radiation-induced brain injury and the more obvious the brain oedema and clinical symptoms [2]. Radiation injury can cause demyelination, degeneration, and even death of glial cells and can damage the blood–brain barrier, so it is difficult to determine whether a new enhanced lesion in the resected site or irradiated site is recurrent glioma or radiation injury by conventional imaging techniques [3, 4].

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) visualizes anatomical structures by detecting the diffuse movement of water molecules and reflects the structural changes of a tissue at the cellular level. A hypointense signal on DWI indicates more diffuse movement of water molecules, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which is the diffusion coefficient of water molecules in a voxela and a commonly used quantitative DWI measure [5]. A higher apparent diffusion coefficient while a hyperintense signal on a DWI image indicates restricted diffusion of water molecules and a lower ADC [6]. Therefore, recurrent glioma and radiation injury can be quantitatively analysed by measuring ADC.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can quantitatively detect changes in metabolites in tissues in a noninvasive manner [1]. Metabolites commonly detected include N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), lipids (Lip), and lactic acid (Lac). There are fundamental differences in histology and in cellular metabolites between recurrent glioma and radiation injury. Therefore, MRS can be used to distinguish recurrent glioma and radiation injury through multiparameter comparative analysis [7, 8]. However, it has been found in clinical diagnosis that single-sequence imaging cannot accurately distinguish between glioma recurrence and radiation-induced brain injury due to its limited diagnostic accuracy and the low sensitivity of the measured values. Therefore, it is necessary to combine multisequence and multiparameter imaging to improve the diagnostic accuracy. A previous study analyzeed the specific correlation between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) -derived metrics and MRS metabolite ratios in the brains of glioblastoma patients and found that peritumoral oedema represents the biggest challenge, with at least ten significant correlations between DTI and MRS that need additional studies [9].

Here, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the domestic and international achievements in the differentiation between glioma recurrence and radiation-induced brain injury using MRS combined with DWI. We aimed to provide reliable imaging parameters for the rapid and accurate identification of radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence, thus helping clinicians choose suitable treatment options and improve patient prognosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search

Studies in Chinese and English related to the differential diagnosis between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using DWI combined with MRS and published before 15 October 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database. The search terms were “DWI,” “MRS,” “diffusion-weighted imaging,” “magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” “glioma,” and “radiation injury.” The search formula (((glioma) AND (radiation injury)) AND ((magnetic resonance spectroscopy) OR (MRS))) AND ((diffusion-weighted imaging) OR (DWI)) was used to retrieve English studies. The equivalent Chinese terms were used in the Chinese databases.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the subjects in the included studies were patients with definite diagnosis of glioma; (2) the diagnostic method in the literature was DWI combined with MRS; (3) the outcome measures of the study included ① ADC, ② Cho/Cr (metabolite Cho/(Cr/phosphocreatine)) ratio, ③ Cho/NAA (metabolite Cho/NAA) ratio, ④ the diagnostic efficacy of the Cho/Cr ratio, and the diagnostic efficacy of the Cho/NAA ratio; (4) the data in the literature were complete.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) incomplete statistical results or incomplete relevant data; (2) repeated publications; (3) diagnostic methods other than DWI combined with MRS; and (4) conference papers, meta-analyses, and literature reviews.

2.3. Literature Screening and Data Extraction

Two researchers first independently screened the retrieved studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then cross-checked the studies. If they had controversial opinions on a paper, the paper was evaluated by a third researcher, and then all three of them would discuss it to reach a consensus. Two researchers extracted relevant data from the included studies, including first author(s), publication year, country of publication, sample size, ADC, the Cho/Cr ratio, the diagnostic efficacy of the Cho/NAA ratio, the Cho/Cr ratio, and the diagnostic efficacy of the Cho/NAA ratio.

2.4. Evaluation of Literature Quality

A quality assessment was conducted, adapting to this particular review the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The QUADAS-2 format includes four domains: (1) patient selection; (2) index testing; (3) reference standard; and (4) flow and timing. For each domain, the risk of bias and concerns about applicability (the latter not applying to the domain of flow and timing) were analysed. The results of the quality assessment were used for descriptive purposes to provide an evaluation of the overall quality of the included studies and to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.

2.5. Statistical Methods

All the data were analysed in Stata 16.0. Measurement data are represented as the weighted mean difference (WMD), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the indicator of the effect size. Interstudy heterogeneity was determined by combing the χ² test and I² quantitative analysis. If and I² < 50%, the interstudy heterogeneity was acceptable, and the fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis; if and I² > 50%, the interstudy heterogeneity was large, and the random-effects model was used for analysis [10].

3. Results

3.1. Flowchart of Literature Retrieval and Results

A total of 431 relevant original articles were identified in this meta-analysis. After carefully reading the titles and abstracts and screening the articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 32 articles were left. Then, after reading the whole articles, 11 available articles were included and all the research was retrospective studies (see Figure 1).

3.2. Methodological Quality of Included Studies

We extracted this data using a modified QUADAS‐2 criteria proforma that focused on four domains of methodological quality: patient selection; index test; reference standard; and flow and timing. The domain with the highest level of risk for bias across all studies was that of patient selection (>50%) (Figure 2).

3.3. Basic Information and Quality Evaluation of the Included Articles

A total of 11 articles were included in this study, involving 320 patients [11–21]. The basic characteristics and quality evaluation of the included studies are given in Table 1.

3.4. Meta-Analysis of Relative ADC (rADC)

The rADC of the included studies had a high degree of heterogeneity (I² = 79.4%, ). The random-effects model was used to combine the effect sizes. The rADC was significantly lower in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group (standardized mean difference = −1.29, 95% CI (−1.87, −0.71), ). Besides, subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent results with the pooled diagnostic performance for both East Asian and Caucasian populations (see Figure 3).

3.5. Meta-Analysis of the Cho/Cr Ratio

The Cho/Cr ratio of the included studies had moderate heterogeneity (I² = 73.0%, ). The random-effects model was used to combine the effect size. The Cho/Cr ratio was significantly elevated in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group (WMD = 0.65, 95% CI (0.40, 0.90), ). The subgroup analysis based on ethnicity showed that the Cho/Cr ratio was significantly higher in the recurrent glioma group than in those radiation injury group (see Figure 4).

3.6. Meta-Analysis of the Cho/NAA Ratio

The Cho/NAA ratio of the included studies had high heterogeneity (I² = 83.1%, ). The random-effects model was used to combine the effect sizes. The results indicated that the Cho/NAA ratio was significantly increased in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group (WMD = 0.80, 95% CI (0.39, 1.21), ). Additionally, stratified analysis by ethnicity demonstrated that the abovementioned results could only be identified in East Asian groups (WMD = 0.92, 95% CI (0.46, 1.38), ) but not in Caucasian populations (WMD = 0.44, 95% CI (−0.44, 1.31), ) (Figure 5).

3.7. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Cho/Cr Ratio and Cho/NAA Ratio

The results of the meta-analysis of the diagnostic efficacy of the Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio are shown in Table 2 and Figures 6 and 7 (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves). The Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio had high accuracies in the differential diagnosis between recurrent glioma and radiation injury. The Fagan nomograms of the Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio showed that when the test result was positive, the probability of accurate detection increased from 20% (pretest probability) to 77% (post-test probability) (Figure 8). When the test result was negative, the probability of accurate detection decreased from 20% (pretest probability) to 5% (post-test probability), further indicating that the Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio can improve the identification efficiency of recurrent glioma and radiation injury.

3.8. Heterogeneity Test and Sensitivity Analysis

Significant heterogeneity between these studies was observed among the outcome measures (Figures 3–5). The results of our subgroup analysis confirmed that ethnicity was the primary sources of heterogeneity. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of an individual study on the pooled results. The pooled effects were not affected by removing any study.

3.9. Publication Bias

Because rADC, the Cho/Cr ratio, the Cho/NAA ratio, and other outcome measures were analysed using conventional meta-analytical methods, fewer than 10 included studies had rADC, the Cho/Cr ratio, or the Cho/NAA ratio. This meant the publication bias could not be effectively evaluated through the symmetry of the funnel plot, so it was evaluated using Egger’s test. The results showed no publication bias () in rADC (), Cho/Cr ratio (), and Cho/NAA ratio (). The results of the Deeks funnel plots of the Cho/Cr ratio and Cho/NAA ratio did not show any publication bias in the diagnostic efficiency of the Cho/Cr ratio () or in the diagnostic efficiency of the Cho/NAA ratio ().

4. Discussion

Glioma is characterized by diffuse growth and is the most refractory tumour with the highest recurrence rate [22, 23]. On the one hand, patients need postoperative radiotherapy to prolong their survival, but on the other hand, they must tolerate the tissue damage caused by radiotherapy. Conventional non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced MRI are the most commonly used MRI techniques. However, both recurrent glioma and radiation injury show enhancement of the lesion area during enhanced MRI [4, 24] and thus are extremely difficult to differentially diagnose. In addition, the lesion area has a complex composition, with tumour cells and the radiation-damaged tissue coexisting or existing alone. The application of DWI combined with MRS in the diagnosis of recurrent glioma and radiation injury can reduce the misdiagnosis rate, thereby providing clinicians with information with which to develop treatment plans.

The results of our meta-analysis showed that ADC was lower in the recurrent glioma group than in the radiation injury group. ADC can be used to quantitatively study the diffuse movement of intracellular water molecules. Tissues of recurrent tumours have a high cell density, relatively narrow intercellular space, restricted intracellular diffusion of water molecules, and low movement ability, resulting in a decrease in ADC [25, 26]. Tissues of radiation-induced lesions have a low cell density, an enlarged intercellular space, and active diffusion of water molecules due to necrosis and liquefaction of cells and degeneration and dissolution of myelin sheaths and axons in the lesions, leading to a high ADC value [27–29]. Although ADC had high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis did not reveal the main cause of the heterogeneity, so ADC was relatively stable. Cells in recurrent glioma proliferate vigorously and have accelerated metabolism; their cell membranes and organelles are disintegrated to release free Cho; tumour cells show infiltrating growth; and nerve cells are destroyed. The MRS manifestations of recurrent glioma include decreased NAA peaks, differently increased Cho peaks, slightly decreased Cr, and increased Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios [30, 31]. Radiation-induced brain injury is a complication of radiotherapy, which is related to the radiation dose, the size of the radiation field, the radiation frequency during the treatment process, and the survival time of the patient [32]. Radiation injury can lead to cell necrosis, inflammatory repair, neuronal damage, and reduced metabolism, which manifests as the diminution or disappearance of Cho and NAA peaks. When the brain tissue is permanently damaged, the MRS parameters are all low [33, 34]. Therefore, the Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios were lower in radiation injury than in recurrent glioma. The sensitivity and specificity of the Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios in the diagnosis of glioma recurrence were both moderate to high.

Patients undergoing radiotherapy after glioma surgery can be diagnosed with recurrent glioma if the contrast-enhanced MRI scan reveals new enhanced lesions in the brain and the lesion area has a decreased ADC and increased Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios. Otherwise, they can be diagnosed with radiation injury. Even if the lesion area contains a mixture of tumour cells and radiation-induced brain injury components, its ADC, Cho/Cr ratio, and Cho/NAA ratio will still be different from those of simple radiation injury due to the characteristics of tumour cells. Therefore, multisequence and multiparameter imaging can improve the accuracy and sensitivity of the differential diagnosis between recurrent glioma and radiation injury.

At the same time, we also note that relevant literature points out that adc, as one of the quantitative indicators of DWI, the detection of glioma is different for each tumour region, where the ADC values should be measured in the peritumoral oedema region or the gadolinium-enhanced part [35]. Of course, more clinicians are needed to test its clinical applicability. In summary, multiparameter quantitative analysis through DWI with MRS can effectively improve the accuracy of the differential diagnosis between recurrent glioma and radiation injury and provide effective imaging parameters for clinicians, thereby helping clinicians choose treatment options and improve patient prognosis.

Data Availability

All data and codes are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the authors that tried to provide us with additional data upon our request. This work was supported by the Shenyang Science and Technology Program Public Health R&D Special Project (22-321-32-02).

References

J. Bergqvist, H. Iderberg, J. Mesterton, N. Bengtsson, B. Wettermark, and R. Henriksson, “Healthcare resource use, comorbidity, treatment and clinical outcomes for patients with primary intracranial tumors: a Swedish population-based register study,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 56, pp. 405–414, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Kelly, S. Leary, P. Khanna, and A. H. Weiss, “Longitudinal measures of visual function, tumor volume, and prediction of visual outcomes after treatment of optic pathway gliomas,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, pp. 1231–1237, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Kessler and A. A. Bhatt, “Brain tumour post-treatment imaging and treatment-related complications,” Insights Imaging, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1057–1075, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Yoon, H. S. Kim, M. J. Koh et al., “Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma from delayed radiation necrosis by using voxel-based multiparametric analysis of MR imaging data,” Radiology, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 206–213, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Moreno-Jimenez, E. Flores-Alvarez, C. Durand-Muñoz, F. Cortes-Hernandez, O. Muñoz-Hernandez, and E. Roldan-Valadez, “Clinical significance of fractional anisotropy measured in peritumoral edema as a biomarker of overall survival in glioblastoma: evidence using correspondence analysis,” Neurology India, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1074–1081, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Pozza, F. Colombo, G. Chierego et al., “Low-grade astrocytomas: treatment with unconventionally fractionated external beam stereotactic radiation therapy,” Radiology, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 565–569, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Crain, P. S. Elias, K. Chapple, A. C. Scheck, J. P. Karis, and M. C. Preul, “Improving the utility of 1H-MRS for the differentiation of glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, L. Ma, Q. Wang, X. Zheng, C. Wu, and B. N. Xu, “Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the differentiation of recurrent glioma from radiation necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 2181–2189, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Flores-Alvarez, E. Anselmo Rios Piedra, G. A. Cruz-Priego, C. Durand-Muñoz, S. Moreno-Jimenez, and E. Roldan-Valadez, “Correlations between DTI-derived metrics and MRS metabolites in tumour regions of glioblastoma: a pilot study,” Radiology and Oncology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 394–408, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. G. Leeflang, “Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 889–897, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Meng, S. Zhou, Z. Miao, Y. Zhou, and D. Wang, “MR multi-parametric scoring system in distinction between brain glioma recurrence and radiation-induced brain injury: a preliminary study,” Journal of Clinical Radiology, vol. 29, pp. 1594–1599, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Liu, X. K. Zhu, and L. L. Zheng, “Application analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in postoperative recurrence and radiation injury of gliomas,” Journal of Imaging Impact Factor, vol. 3, pp. 159-160, 2019, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Q. Li, H. C. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Chen, “Differential diagnosis of brain glioma recurrence and radiation brain injury by MR functional imaging,” Journal of Frontiers Medicine, vol. 5, pp. 30-31, 2015, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
T. J. Liu and Y. J. Zheng, “Application value of proton MRS combined with DWI in differentiating postoperative recurrence and radiation injury of glioma,” Guangxi Medical Journal, vol. 38, pp. 711–714, 2016, in Chinese.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Zhang, F. Dai, W. Qiao et al., “Functional MRI in differentiating postoperative recurrent glioma from radiation injury,” Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging, vol. 21, pp. 161–165, 2013, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Z. Meng, S. L. Zhou, Z. C. Miao, and G. Yuan, “MR DWI combined with1H-MRS analysis of multi-parameter in distinction of brain glioma recurrence and post-radiation brain injuries,” Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, vol. 27, pp. 905–909, 2011, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Matsusue, J. R. Fink, J. K. Rockhill, T. Ogawa, and K. R. Maravilla, “Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging,” Neuroradiology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bobek-Billewicz, G. Stasik-Pres, H. Majchrzak, and L. Zarudzki, “Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using perfusion, diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy,” Folia Neuropathologica, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 81–92, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. S. Zeng, C. F. Li, H. Liu, J. H. Zhen, and D. C. Feng, “Distinction between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Feng, P. Yuan, T. Huang, L. Li, and J. Lyu, “Distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI,” Academic Radiology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1320–1331, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Di Costanzo, T. Scarabino, F. Trojsi et al., “Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme versus radiation injury: a multiparametric 3-T MR approach,” Radiologia Medica, La, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 616–624, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hamard, D. Ratel, L. Selek, F. Berger, B. van der Sanden, and D. Wion, “The brain tissue response to surgical injury and its possible contribution to glioma recurrence,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 128, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. G. Shaw, B. Berkey, S. W. Coons et al., “Recurrence following neurosurgeon-determined gross-total resection of adult supratentorial low-grade glioma: results of a prospective clinical trial,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 835–841, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Chung, H. S. Kim, N. Kim, C. G. Choi, and S. J. Kim, “Recurrent glioblastoma: optimum area under the curve method derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 561–568, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. John, E. Bosnyák, N. L. Robinette et al., “Multimodal imaging-defined subregions in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: impact on overall survival,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 264–273, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Zakaria, K. Das, M. Radon et al., “Diffusion-weighted MRI characteristics of the cerebral metastasis to brain boundary predicts patient outcomes,” BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 26, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cha, S. T. Kim, H. J. Kim et al., “Analysis of the layering pattern of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumour progression,” European Radiology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 879–886, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Asao, Y. Korogi, M. Kitajima et al., “Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1455–1460, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Hu, K. K. Wong, G. S. Young, L. Guo, and S. T. Wong, “Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 296–305, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Server, R. Josefsen, B. Kulle et al., “Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the distinction of high-grade cerebral gliomas from single metastatic brain tumors,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Isobe, A. Matsumura, I. Anno et al., “Quantification of cerebral metabolites in glioma patients with proton MR spectroscopy using T2 relaxation time correction,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 343–349, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Soussain, D. Ricard, J. R. Fike, J. J. Mazeron, D. Psimaras, and J. Y. Delattre, “CNS complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy,” The Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9701, pp. 1639–1651, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Calvar, F. J. Meli, C. Romero et al., “Characterization of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Z. Wang, S. J. Qiu, X. F. Lv et al., “Diffusion tensor imaging and 1H-MRS study on radiation-induced brain injury after nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 340–345, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cortez-Conradis, R. Favila, K. Isaac-Olive, M. Martinez-Lopez, C. Rios, and E. Roldan-Valadez, “Diagnostic performance of regional DTI-derived tensor metrics in glioblastoma multiforme: simultaneous evaluation of p, q, L, Cl, Cp, Cs, RA, RD, AD, mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy,” European Radiology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1112–1121, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Hongyi Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

216

Downloads

391

Citations