A Network Meta-Analysis of Two Doses of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for Treating Sepsis-Related Thrombocytopenia

Chen, Dandan; Hou, Yu; Wei, Chaochao; Cai, Xingjun

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2124019

International Journal of Clinical Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2124019 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2124019

A Network Meta-Analysis of Two Doses of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for Treating Sepsis-Related Thrombocytopenia

Dandan Chen,¹Yu Hou,¹Chaochao Wei,²and Xingjun Cai²

Academic Editor: Tomas Jose Gonzalez-Lopez

Received22 Sept 2022

Accepted22 Dec 2022

Published30 Dec 2022

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that sepsis remains a common critical illness with a global incidence of 31.5 million. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative therapeutic value of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in treating sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia. We conducted a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI from its inception through December 31, 2021. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 963 patients were included. Network meta-analyses showed that rhTPO 300 U/kg/day and rhTPO 15000 U/day significantly increased the platelet (PLT) levels on the 7^th day and decreased the requirement of transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and PLT compared with IVIG and NAT. SUCRA showed that rhTPO 300 U/kg/day ranked first in terms of 28-day mortality (85.5%) and transfusion, including RBC (88.7%), plasma (89.6%), and PLT (95.2%), while rhTPO 15000 U/day ranked first for the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay (95.9%) and PLT level at day 7 (91.6%). rhTPO 300 U/kg/day may be the optimal dose to reduce 28-day mortality and transfusion requirements. However, rhTPO 15000 U/day may be the optimal dose for shortening the ICU stay and increasing the PLT level on the 7th day. However, additional studies to further validate our findings are needed.

1. Introduction

Sepsis remains a common critical illness with a global incidence of 31.5 million [1] and the leading cause of death in the intensive care unit (ICU) [2], with an annual mortality rate of 16.8% [3]. Thrombocytopenia [4], defined as sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia, is frequently seen in patients with sepsis, and has been reported to occur in 35%–59% of the patients [5].

Patients with sepsis diagnosed with thrombocytopenia may develop multiple organ dysfunction and have a higher mortality rate [6–8]. Specifically, thrombocytopenia accounts for 13%–83% of the mortality rate in patients with sepsis [9, 10]. Sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia was also found to be strongly associated with longer ICU stays, and the length of hospital stay was a prognostic indicator in patients with sepsis [4]. A previous meta-analysis showed that sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia significantly increases the risk of complications such as shock and acute kidney injury [11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop safe and effective treatment strategies to restore platelet (PLT) levels in septic patients with thrombocytopenia [12].

A series of treatments, such as anti-infective therapy, transfusion of PLT, intravenous injection of recombinant human interleukin (rhIL) including rhIL-6 and rhIL-11, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and administration of platelet-elevating drugs, are currently available for sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia [13–15]. Because of the scarcity of resources, transfusion-related complications, and PLT antibody production, the clinical application of PLT transfusion is strictly limited to patients with sepsis [16, 17]. The clinical use of intravenous rhIL is associated with mild thrombopoietic activity and unacceptable adverse effects; therefore, the procedure is limited and needs more caution in clinical application [17]. So, the clinical use of IVIG is not recommended for the treatment of sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia [18].

As a full-length glycosylated TPO, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) has biological functions similar to endogenous TPO [19]. Studies have shown that rhTPO effectively increases peripheral blood PLT levels in patients with immune- or chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia and reduces adverse effects [20, 21]. Therefore, rhTPO may be a rescue therapy for septic patients with thrombocytopenia. In addition, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that in patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia, PLT levels were significantly elevated on the 7^th day after administration of rhTPO, and blood product transfusion volumes were reduced [15]. Notably, two different dosing regimens of rhTPO, including rhTPO 300 U/kg/day and rhTPO 15000 U/day, were available for treating septic patients with thrombocytopenia, but which dosing regimen might be better remains unclear [22]. Therefore, the present network meta-analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic values of two dosing regimens of rhTPO.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We performed this study according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for reporting network meta-analyses [23]. Ethical approval and informed consent were not required as this was a network meta-analysis of published studies. Moreover, we did not register a formal protocol for this network meta-analysis.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

We designed eligibility criteria based on the PICOS acronym, and studies that met the following criteria were included in this network meta-analysis: (a) participant (P): adult patient diagnosed with sepsis-related thrombocytopenia [24]; (b) intervention (I): rhTPO was prescribed for patients in the study group; (c) comparison (C): patients in the control group were not prescribed additional therapy (NAT) or IVIG in addition to conventional antibiotic therapy (CAT); (d) outcomes (O): reported at least one of the following: 28-day mortality, the length of ICU stay, platelet level on the 7^th day, and transfusion of blood products including red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and platelets; and (e) study design (S): only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with full texts published in English and Chinese.

Studies that met the following criteria were excluded from this study: (a) ineligible study designs, such as case reports and conference abstracts; (b) replicate studies published by the same author or project; and (c) essential data for synthesis was not available.

2.3. Literature Retrieval

A comprehensive search was conducted independently by two researchers (Dandan Chen and Yu Hou) in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) to identify relevant studies published before December 31, 2021. We developed a search query using the following keywords and MeSH terms: “sepsis,” “pyemia,” “pyohemia,” “pyemia,” “septicemia,” “specific infection,” “systemic inflammatory response syndrome,” “SIRS,” “septic shock,” “thrombocytopenia,” “thrombopenia,” “thrombopoietin,” “TPO,” “thrombocytopoiesis stimulating factor,” and “colony-stimulating factors.” We identified additional studies by checking the references of included reviews and eligible studies. Any conflicts between the two researchers were resolved with the help of a third researcher (Xingjun Cai).

2.4. Study Selection

After the removal of duplicate records, all titles and abstracts of the remaining studies were independently screened by two researchers (Dandan Chen and Chaochao Wei) for the initial eligibility assessment. Then, the full texts of the remaining studies were retrieved for the final eligibility assessment. With the help of a third researcher, any conflicts were resolved.

2.5. Data Extraction

Basic information was independently extracted by two researchers (Dandan Chen and Chaochao Wei) from included studies, including the first author, publication year, sample size, percentage of male participants, age of participants, baseline PLT level, baseline acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation II/III (APACHE II/III) score, and outcome data. We emailed the leading author to obtain related data when essential data were not available in the original study. Any conflicts were resolved with the help of a third researcher (Xingjun Cai).

2.6. Outcomes of Interest

We regarded the 28-day mortality and the length of ICU stay as the primary outcomes, and PLT levels on the 7^th day posttreatment and transfusion of blood products including RBC, plasma, and PLT, as the secondary outcome.

2.7. Geometry of the Evidence Network

The evidence structure for each outcome was displayed using a network plot. In the network plot, the size of the node is weighted by the accumulated sample size, marked as white numerical values, and the width of the solid line is weighted by the number of direct comparisons, marked as a black numerical value close to the solid line [25]. Furthermore, the dotted line indicates the lack of direct comparison between the two interventions.

2.8. Risk of Bias Assessment

Two independent researchers (Dandan Chen and Yu Hou) assessed the risks of bias of each study from the following seven items, according to the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool [26]: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcomes assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. Based on the evaluation criteria, each item was rated as “low,” “unclear,” or “high” risk. Any conflicts were resolved with the help of a third researcher.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled result for 28-day mortality, and the mean difference (MD) with 95%CI was used to express the differences in the length of ICU stay, PLT levels on the 7^th day posttreatment, and transfusion of RBC, plasma, and PLT. The transitivity of included studies was assessed based on clinical and methodological characteristics [27, 28]. Consistency between direct and indirect effects was assessed based on the global consistency model test [29] and the local consistency model test [30]. Meanwhile, the node-splitting method was used to check whether there was an inconsistency in the closed loop [31, 32]. A random effect model was used to calculate the relative efficacy of different doses [33], and a forest plot was used to show the differences between interventions [34]. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) plot was used to show the ranking of different interventions in the same outcome [35]. Publication bias was checked based on the comparison-adjusted funnel plot [36]. All analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) with the “network” command [37]. was considered to be a statistical difference.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Selection

A total of 139 relevant studies were identified from the initial literature retrieval, and after removing duplicate records (n = 25) and irrelevant studies (n = 100), 14 articles were retained for further eligibility assessment. After the screening of full texts, 11 studies were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. In addition, 2 eligible studies were added from the published meta-analysis. Finally, this network meta-analysis included 13 studies [38–50] involving 963 patients. The details of the study selection are shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics

All 13 studies were reported by Chinese researchers between 2011 and 2021. The sample size ranged from 43 to 102, with a cumulative number of 963. Two studies [40, 44] compared rhTPO 15000 U/day with IVIG; 4 studies [38, 41, 42, 46] compared rhTPO 300 U/kg/day with IVIG; 3 studies [39, 45, 50] compared rhTPO 15000 U/day with NAT; and 4 studies [43, 47–49] compared rhTPO 300 U/kg/day with NAT. Additional characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. The results of individual studies are shown in Table S1.

3.3. Risk of Bias

Figure S1 shows details of the risk of bias for the 13 eligible studies. All 13 studies [38–50] used appropriate methods to generate random sequences, but only 2 studies [46, 49] explicitly reported the methods to perform allocation concealment. Risks were unclear in all studies with respect to the blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessment [38–50]. All studies [38–50] had a low risk of incomplete outcome data and selective reporting of outcomes. Furthermore, for other biases, the risk of all studies was unclear [38–50].

3.4. Transitivity Assessment

We conducted a transitivity assessment between comparisons based on five main characteristics, including sample size, the proportion of males, mean age, baseline PLT levels, and APACHE scores. As shown in Table S2, transitivity was determined for most of the comparisons, except for rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day vs. NAT ( = 0.034) and rhTPO 300 U/day vs. NAT ( = 0.042) for male proportion and IVIG vs. NAT ( = 0.003) for disease severity.

3.5. 28-Day Mortality

For 28-day mortality, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure 2. Global and local consistency model tests showed no inconsistency (Figure S2), and the consistency model was used for network meta-analysis. No significant difference was found between treatment strategies (Figure 3(a)). The results of SUCRA showed that rhTPO 300 U/day had the highest probability of being the best (85.5%), followed by rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day (46.4%) (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.6. The Length of ICU Stay

For the length of the ICU stay, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure 4. Global and local consistency model tests showed no inconsistency (Figure S3), so the consistency model was chosen. No significant difference was detected between treatment strategies (Figure 5(a)). The results of SUCRA showed that rhTPO 1500 U/kg/day had the highest probability of being the best (95.9%), followed by rhTPO 300 U/day (64.3%) (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.7. PLT Level on the 7^th Day

For the PLT level on the 7^th day posttreatment, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure S4a. Global and local consistency model tests showed no inconsistency (Figure S5a), so the consistency model was chosen. The pooled results showed that rhTPO 300 U/day and rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day significantly increased PLT levels on the 7^th day posttreatment compared with IVIG and NAT (Figure 6(a)). The results of SUCRA showed that rhTPO 1500 U/kg/day had the highest probability of being the best (91.6%), followed by rhTPO 300 U/day (74.4%).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.8. Transfusion of Blood Products

For the transfusion of RBCs, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure S4a. Global and local consistency model tests showed no inconsistency (Figure S5b), so the consistency model was selected. Pooled results showed that rhTPO 300 U/day and rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day were associated with lower RBC transfusions compared with IVIG and NAT, respectively (Figure 6(b)). The results of SUCRA showed that rhTPO 300 U/day had the highest probability of being the best (88.7%), followed by rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day (76.1%).

For the transfusion of plasma, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure S4c. Global and local consistency model tests showed no inconsistency (Figure S5c), and a consistency model was selected. No significant difference was detected between treatment strategies (Figure 6(c)). The results of SUCRA showed that rhTPO 300 U/day had the highest probability of being the best (89.6%), followed by rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day (52.5%).

For the transfusion of PLT, a network plot of the evidence structure is shown in Figure S4d. Global and local consistency model tests indicated no inconsistency (Figure S5d), and the consistency model was selected. The pooled results showed that rhTPO 300 U/day and rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day were associated with lower PLT transfusions compared with IVIG and NAT, respectively (Figure 6(d)). The results of SUCRA indicated that rhTPO 300 U/day had the highest probability of being the best (95.2%), followed by rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day (70.1%).

3.9. Closed-Loop Inconsistency and Publication Bias

For each outcome, the closed-loop inconsistency was also evaluated based on the node-splitting method. As shown in Figure S6, no closed-loop inconsistency was found, indicating the robustness of all pooled results. In addition, the publication bias of the primary outcomes was further examined. As shown in Figure S7, the symmetric outline of the comparison-adjusted funnel plots indicated that there was no publication bias.

4. Discussion

Evidence suggests that patients with sepsis-related thrombocytopenia have longer ICU stays [4] and a worse prognosis [8, 10]. As a novel rescue therapy, rhTPO has been shown to be effective in increasing peripheral PLT levels [19], as confirmed by a recent pairwise meta-analysis [15]. Unfortunately, which doses of rhTPO might be optimal for septic patients with thrombocytopenia remains unclear as a direct comparison is absent. Therefore, in order to draw firm conclusions, this study indirectly investigated the comparative therapeutic values of two available doses of rhTPO by introducing a network meta-analysis. Based on the results of this network meta-analysis, rhTPO 300 U/day may be the best option for reducing 28-day mortality and blood transfusion requirements. However, rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day may be the best option for shortening the ICU stay and increasing peripheral PLT levels on the 7th day posttreatment.

Notably, a pairwise meta-analysis [15] determined whether rhTPO is a beneficial strategy in septic patients with thrombocytopenia. Based on pooled results from 10 eligible RCTs, rhTPO was associated with increased PLT levels on the 7^th day posttreatment and decreased blood product transfusions during hospitalization. Unfortunately, the optimal dose of rhTPO was not determined in this meta-analysis, which greatly confounds clinical decision-making. Furthermore, this meta-analysis missed an eligible study [38] that investigated the therapeutic values between rhTPO 300 U/day and IVIG. Furthermore, since the publication of this meta-analysis, 2 additional eligible studies have been provided. In contrast to the previous meta-analysis, the present study included all available studies to determine the therapeutic values of 2 different doses of rhTPO by introducing a network meta-analysis technique. Therefore, the optimal dose for each outcome was determined based on more robust and reliable results.

This network meta-analysis yielded some robust findings due to 3 methodological strengths: (a) creative use of the network meta-analysis to determine the comparative therapeutic values between two different doses of rhTPO that were not directly compared in the original study; (b) SUCRA plots based on ranking probabilities were used to determine the optimal dose for each clinical outcome; and (c) this network meta-analysis included both control strategies including no additional treatment and IVIG, to increase statistical power.

Certainly, some limitations may have negatively impacted our findings: (a) the sample size is insufficient, because although 13 RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis, only 963 participants were accumulated; (b) all 13 RCTs did not explicitly describe whether participants, personnel, and outcomes assessment were blinded, which could lead to biased implementation; (c) all 13 studies did not report protocol registration and conflict of interest, which could be a source of bias; (d) all 13 studies were conducted in China, so the results should be cautiously used with caution in different clinical settings; (e) although we conducted this network meta-analysis strictly in accordance with the methodological framework recommended by the Cochrane handbook, a formal public protocol was not available for the current network meta-analysis, which will inevitably negatively affect the transparency of this network meta-analysis; (f) due to limited data, we did not assess other outcomes such as the length of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) on day 7, which may be negative for the comprehensiveness of our findings; (g) one study used APACHE III for severity assessment, and it differed from other eligible studies which used APACHE II for severity assessment, which might be the source of bias; and (h) we confirmed transitivity assumption among most of the available comparisons; however, 3 of these comparisons differed significantly in male proportion and disease severity, which may inevitably compromise the reliability of our findings because subgroup analysis cannot be performed due to limited studies.

5. Conclusion

This network meta-analysis suggests that rhTPO 300 U/day may be the best option for improving 28-day mortality and transfusion of blood products for the treatment of septic patients with thrombocytopenia. However, rhTPO 15000 U/kg/day may be the best option for shortening the ICU stay and increasing PLT levels on the 7^th day posttreatment. However, given the limitations, we recommend more studies to further validate our findings.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/as supplementary information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xingjun Cai conceptualized the study; Xingjun Cai and Dandan Chen developed the methodology and used the software. Xingjun Cai and Dandan Chen validated the data. Dandan Chen conducted the formal analysis and investigated the data. Dandan Chen and Yu Hou collected the resource materials. Xingjun Cai and Dandan Chen curated the data. Dandan Chen wrote of the original manuscript. Chaochao Wei and Yu Hou wrote, reviewed, and edited the data. Chaochao Wei visualized the data, and Xingjun Cai supervised the study. Xingjun Cai performed project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to deeply appreciate all authors who performed all eligible studies which have been included in the present network meta-analysis.

Supplementary Materials

Search strategy of pubmed, search strategy of Embase, and search strategy of Cochrane library are given. Table S1. Results of individual studies included in this network meta-analysis. Table S2. Transitivity between different comparisons based on major characteristics. Figure S1. Risk of bias summary (a) and graph (b). Red (−), yellow (?), and green (+) color indicates high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. Figure S2. Consistency model test of 28-day mortality. NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin. Figure S3. Consistency model test of the length of ICU stay. NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin. Figure S4. Evidence network of secondary outcomes including the level of platelet on the 7^th day (a), transfusion of RBC (b), transfusion of plasma (c), and transfusion of platelet (d). NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin. Figure S5. The consistency model test of the secondary outcomes including the level of platelet on the 7^th day (a), transfusion of RBC (b), transfusion of plasma (c), and transfusion of platelet (d). NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin. Figure S6. Results of consistency test based on closed-loop. NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; IF, inconsistency factor; CI, confidence interval. Figure S7. Comparison-adjusted funnel plot of 28-day mortality (a) and the length of ICU stay (b). (a–d) NAT, IVIG, rhTPO 300, and rhTPO 15000, respectively. NAT, no additional treatment; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO 300, 300 U/kg/d recombinant human thrombopoietin; rhTPO 15000, 15000 U/d recombinant human thrombopoietin. (Supplementary Materials)

References

I. Azkárate, G. Choperena, E. Salas et al., “Epidemiology and prognostic factors in severe sepsis/septic shock. Evolution over six years,” Medicina Intensiva, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Schultz, M. W. Dünser, A. M. Dondorp et al., “Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future,” in Sepsis Management in Resource-Limited Settings, A. M. Dondorp, M. W. Dünser, and M. J. Schultz, Eds., pp. 1–24, Springer Copyright, Heidelberger, Berlin, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Fleischmann, A. Scherag, N. K. J. Adhikari et al., “Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 259–272, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Thiery-Antier, C. Binquet, S. Vinault, F. Meziani, J. Boisrame-Helms, and J. P. Quenot, “Is thrombocytopenia an early prognostic marker in septic shock?” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 764–772, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Sharma, M. Sharma, M. Majumder, W. Steier, A. Sangal, and M. Kalawar, “Thrombocytopenia in septic shock patients--a prospective observational study of incidence, risk factors and correlation with clinical outcome,” Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 874–880, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Venkata, R. Kashyap, J. C. Farmer, and B. Afessa, “Thrombocytopenia in adult patients with sepsis: incidence, risk factors, and its association with clinical outcome,” J Intensive Care, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 9, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Menard, A. Kumar, D. S. Houston et al., “Evolution and impact of thrombocytopenia in septic shock: a retrospective cohort study,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 558–565, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moreau, J. F. Timsit, A. Vesin et al., “Platelet count decline: an early prognostic marker in critically ill patients with prolonged ICU stays,” Chest, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1735–1741, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Levi and E. C. Löwenberg, “Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 417–424, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. M. Claushuis, L. A. van Vught, B. P. Scicluna et al., “Thrombocytopenia is associated with a dysregulated host response in critically ill sepsis patients,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 24, pp. 3062–3072, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xie, R. Tian, H. Xie et al., “The clinical significance of thrombocytopenia complicating sepsis: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Infection, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 323–337, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhou, T. Feng, Y. Xie et al., “The effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) on sepsis patients with acute severe thrombocytopenia: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RESCUE trial),” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 780, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Kuter, “Managing thrombocytopenia associated with cancer chemotherapy,” Oncology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 282–294, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. C. A. Naime, J. O. F. Ganaes, and M. E. Lopes-Pires, “Sepsis: the involvement of platelets and the current treatments,” Current Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 261–269, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, Z. Lu, W. Xiao, T. Hua, Y. Zheng, and M. Yang, “Efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin on sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, p. 940, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Heyman and C. A. Schiffer, “Platelet transfusion therapy for the cancer patient,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 198–209, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Nieken, N. H. Mulder, J. Buter et al., “Recombinant human interleukin-6 induces a rapid and reversible anemia in cancer patients,” Blood, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 900–905, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Critical Care Medicine Committee of Chinese People’s Liberation Army and Chinese Society of Laboratory Medicine, Chinese Medical Association, “Expert consensus for diagnosis and treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult critical illness in China,” Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 457–474, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Vadhan-Raj, V. Cohen, and C. Bueso-Ramos, “Thrombopoietic growth factors and cytokines,” Current Hematology Reports, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Wang, R. Yang, P. Zou et al., “A multicenter randomized controlled trial of recombinant human thrombopoietin treatment in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Kong, P. Qin, S. Xiao et al., “A novel recombinant human thrombopoietin therapy for the management of immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy,” Blood, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 1097–1103, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dias and D. M. Caldwell, “Network meta-analysis explained,” Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. F8–f12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Hutton, G. Salanti, D. M. Caldwell et al., “The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 777–784, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shankar-Hari, G. S. Phillips, M. L. Levy et al., “Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3),” JAMA, vol. 315, no. 8, pp. 775–787, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Salanti, A. E. Ades, and J. P. Ioannidis, “Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 163–171, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. T. Higgins, D. G. Altman, P. C. Gotzsche et al., “The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials,” BMJ, vol. 343, Article ID d5928, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cipriani, J. P. Higgins, J. R. Geddes, and G. Salanti, “Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Salanti, “Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool,” Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–97, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Tu, “Using generalized linear mixed models to evaluate inconsistency within a network meta-analysis,” Value in Health, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1120–1125, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. T. Higgins, D. Jackson, J. K. Barrett, G. Lu, A. E. Ades, and I. R. White, “Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies,” Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 98–110, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yu-Kang, “Node-splitting generalized linear mixed models for evaluation of inconsistency in network meta-analysis,” Value in Health, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 957–963, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lu and A. E. Ades, “Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, no. 474, pp. 447–459, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lu and A. E. Ades, “Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 20, pp. 3105–3124, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chaimani, J. P. T. Higgins, D. Mavridis, P. Spyridonos, and G. Salanti, “Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e76654, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mbuagbaw, B. Rochwerg, R. Jaeschke et al., “Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses,” Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 79, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. C. Sterne, M. Egger, and G. D. Smith, “Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis,” BMJ, vol. 323, no. 7304, pp. 101–105, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. White, Network: Stata Module to Perform Network Meta-Analysis, Statistical software components, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017.
Y. H. Chen, “The clinical effect of the treatment of human recombinant platelet hormone and immune globulin sepsis correlation of thrombocytopenia,” China Continuing Medical Education, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 174-175, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Dong, N. Ma, S. Chang et al., “The role of recombinant human thrombopoietin in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia: a clinical study,” Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1445–1449, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Q. Feng, J. P. Gu, and Y. Yu, “Efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin in treatment of sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” China Rural Health, vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 10-11, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Gao, B. Wang, Y. Li, and Y. Q. Wang, “The clinical study of rhTPO used for treatment of sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 239–243, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Li, “Clinical study of recombinant human thrombopoietin and immunoglobulin in treatment of sepsis associated thrombocytopenia,” Drugs and Clinic, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 313–317, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Q. Wang, and B. Wang, “Effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin and interleukin-11 in the treatment of septic-related thrombocytopenia,” Journal of Tianjin Medical University, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 114–117, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Y. Peng, Y. Hong, G. G. Liu et al., “Efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin combined with immunoglobulin in the treatment of sepsis-related thrombocytopenia,” China Pharmaceuticals, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 25–27, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Qi, C. Q. Meng, Y. Shang, S. Y. Yuan, and S. L. Yao, “The efficacy and safety of rhTPO in the treatment of sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” Journal of Clinical Emergency (China), vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 663–667, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Wang, F. C. Yao, Y. Q. Wang et al., “A multi-center clinical observation of recombinant human thrombopoietin for the treatment of sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 6324–6334, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Yan, W. K. Zhang, and L. Y. Hou, “Therapeutic effects of recombinant human thrombopoietin on sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 46, no. 15, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
H. W. Yang, Q. P. Yu, X. W. Ye, L. Li, and S. Liu, “Effect Research of recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” Medical Innovation of China, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1–3, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
W. F. Zhang, J. J. Fang, G. B. Wang et al., “Clinical study of recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia,” Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine (Electronic Edition), vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 300–308, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Y. Zhang, W. J. Qi, W. J. Zhou, Q. Liu, X. Wang, and X. Yang, “Clinical study of recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with sepsisassociated thrombocytopenia,” Ningxia Medical Journal, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 784–787, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Dandan Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

171

Downloads

354

Citations

International Journal of Clinical Practice

A Network Meta-Analysis of Two Doses of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for Treating Sepsis-Related Thrombocytopenia

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

2.3. Literature Retrieval

2.4. Study Selection

2.5. Data Extraction

2.6. Outcomes of Interest

2.7. Geometry of the Evidence Network

2.8. Risk of Bias Assessment

2.9. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Literature Selection

3.2. Study Characteristics

3.3. Risk of Bias

3.4. Transitivity Assessment

3.5. 28-Day Mortality

3.6. The Length of ICU Stay

3.7. PLT Level on the 7th Day

3.8. Transfusion of Blood Products

3.9. Closed-Loop Inconsistency and Publication Bias

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

Supplementary Materials

References

Copyright

3.7. PLT Level on the 7^th Day