Physical and Rehabilitation Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bai, Jingwen; Tian, Yilan; Wang, Yiran; Zhang, Xiaofang; Wang, Ping

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6758454

International Journal of Clinical Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 6758454 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6758454

Physical and Rehabilitation Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jingwen Bai,^1,2Yilan Tian,¹Yiran Wang,¹Xiaofang Zhang,¹and Ping Wang¹

Academic Editor: Qing Wang

Received20 Sept 2022

Revised21 Dec 2022

Accepted23 Dec 2022

Published04 Jan 2023

Abstract

Objective. To compare the effects of different physical and rehabilitation therapies on women with overactive bladder (OAB). Design. Network meta-analysis. Data source: The Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 22, 2022. We included only RCTs, with no language restrictions. Articles in the reference lists and related studies were thoroughly reviewed. Review Methods. This network meta-analysis included related studies on different physical and rehabilitation therapies for OAB. Data were extracted independently from the included randomized controlled trials by two authors, and they used the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool to evaluate the risk of bias. We used RevMan to assess the risk assessment of research bias. This network meta-analysis was performed using the Stata software. We completed the review in accordance with the PRISMA items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. Results. Twelve randomized controlled trials involving 637 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All physical and rehabilitation therapies improved daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency in OAB patients. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES are better interventions for OAB treatment. There were no significant differences in PTNS, BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES. Conclusion. All physical and rehabilitation therapies can improve daytime micturition and nocturia frequency in OAB. PTNS, BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES were the priority therapies.

1. Introduction

Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined by the International Continental Society (ICS) as urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia, which is a symptom syndrome [1]. Diseases with definite pathological factors or those associated with infection must be excluded from the diagnosis [1]. The reported incidence among females in different regions varies, with approximately 6% incidence in China [2], 16.9% in the United States [3], and 16.6% in Europe [4], and an overall trend that increases with age [5, 6]. Moreover, OAB has a significant negative impact on the quality of live, also with increasing healthcare costs [7–10].

The American Urology Association and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine, and Urogenital Reconstruction guidelines recommend four levels of management for OAB: conservative therapy, drug therapy, intradetrusor injection of onabotulinum toxin, sacral neuromodulation, and peripheral tibial nerve stimulation, and surgical therapy [11]. Among the therapeutic techniques for OAB, drug therapy is the simplest and most convenient, which can effectively relieve the symptoms of OAB [12]. However, due to side effects such as dry mouth, constipation, and vision irregularity, the sustainability of drug therapy is seriously affected [13, 14]. Surgical treatment is often used after failure of drugs, physical therapy, and other therapies [15, 16].

Physical and rehabilitation therapies provide more options for female patients with OAB. However, there is a lack of relevant comparative research. Therefore, we searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of different physical and rehabilitation therapies in women with OAB.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

We performed a network meta-analysis of all studies according to the PRISMA 2020 statement [17]. The Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 22, 2022. We searched for titles, abstracts, and keywords by combining the following terms: (overactive bladder) OR (overactive detrusor)) AND (bladder training) OR (pelvic floor muscle training) OR (biofeedback) OR (electric^∗) OR (Kinesio taping) OR (pelvic floor muscle exercise) OR (PTNS) OR (percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation) OR (TTNS) OR (transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation) OR (tibial nerve stimulation) OR (sacral neuromodulation) AND (random^∗). There were no language restrictions. Articles in the reference lists and related studies were thoroughly reviewed. We did not register for this study.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Through a systematic review of all relevant literature, the following studies that met the criteria were included: (1) randomized controlled trials of physical and rehabilitation therapy in women with OAB and (2) women over the age of 18 years. Studies that met the following criteria were excluded: (1) studies of drug therapy or studies without drug washout; (2) studies with OAB surgery; (3) infectious factors, such as urinary tract infection or other obvious pathological changes, such as neurological diseases; and (4) other literature, such as conference abstracts, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, case reports, letters to the editor, or comments.

2.3. Data Extraction

All data were extracted by two authors from randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. The year of publication, specific randomization method, sample size of patients, interventions, and outcomes after the intervention were gathered from each study. We entered the extracted information into Microsoft Excel, and any conflict between the two authors was resolved through full discussion with the third author.

2.4. Risk of Bias Assessment

The risk of bias assessment for the included trials was performed independently by two authors using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool [18]. Factors included in the evaluation were sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other issues. Any disagreement during the evaluation was resolved through a full discussion with the third author.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Review Manager Software (RevMan 5.3; Cochrane Corporation) was used to assess the risk of research bias [19]. The pairwise meta-analysis of direct comparisons was performed using STATA-17.0 (StataCorp, Texas). The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to describe the results for continuous data. Statistical significance was set at . Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I² statistic. If I² ≤ 50%, a fixed-effects model was used for synthesis, otherwise, the random effects model was used. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed when necessary. We used STATA-17.0’s “network map,” “ifPlot,” “netfunnel,” and “sucra” programs to generate the resulting statistical graphs.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Relevant Studies

We identified 1318 studies by searching the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Of these, 334 duplicate studies were deleted, and 984 studies were retrieved, with a total of 266 randomized controlled trials. Among them, nine were conference abstracts, and 232 were deleted according to the exclusion criteria. Finally, 25 studies were included according to the inclusion criteria. The risk of literature bias was assessed based on the results reported by the studies, and data from only 12 studies were combined for this network meta-analysis. A research flowchart related to this literature review is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies and Risk of Bias Assessment

For the 25 RCTs included, the risk of bias was assessed using RevMan 5.3. The generated risk of bias graph is shown in Figure 2, and the risk of bias summary is shown in Figure 3. In terms of random sequence generation, 92% had a low risk of bias and 8% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of allocation concealment, 80% had a low risk of bias and 20% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of blinding of participants and personnel, 60% had a low risk of bias, 20% had a high risk of bias, and 20% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of blinding of outcome assessment, 48% had a low risk of bias, 16% had a high risk of bias, and 36% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of incomplete outcome data, 92% had a low risk of bias, 4% had a high risk of bias, and 4% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of selective reporting, 96% had a low risk of bias and 4% had an unclear risk of bias. In terms of other biases, 96% had a low risk of bias, and 4% had an unclear risk of bias.

Among the 25 studies, only 12 studies collected data on daytime micturition frequency or nocturia frequency; therefore, 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 637 women completed the 12 randomized control trials in this network meta-analysis. Twelve physical and rehabilitation therapies for OAB were included. Table 1 summarizes the basic characteristics of the included studies. There were eight two-arm trials, two three-arm trials, and one four-arm trial. A total of 112 patients were treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), 20 with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), 87 with transcutaneous stimulation of the tibial nerve (TTNS), 19 with PFMT + TTNS, and 30 with PFMT + electrical stimulation (ES). A total of 101 patients were treated with bladder training (BT), 16 with BT + biofeedback (BF), 46 with BT + ES, 16 with BT + BF + ES, 16 with acupuncture, 58 with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), and 35 with BT + magnetic stimulation (MStim). Figure 4 shows the “network map” of daytime micturition and nocturia frequencies.

(a)

(b)

3.3. Inconsistency Test

The comparison-corrected funnel plots for daytime micturition and nocturia frequencies are shown in Figure 5. All the studies were symmetrically distributed on both sides of the midline in the middle and upper parts, suggesting a low risk of publication bias. Inconsistencies were tested for daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency, with values of 0.9680 and 0.3628, respectively; hence, there were no inconsistencies observed. As shown in Figure 6, the ring inconsistency detection shows that the ring inconsistency is not significant, and the direct comparison results are basically consistent with the indirect comparison results; therefore, it cannot be considered that there is great heterogeneity.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

4. Meta-Analysis of Physical and Rehabilitation Therapy for Overactive Bladder

4.1. Daytime Micturition Frequency

A Bayesian mesh meta-analysis of the daytime micturition frequency was conducted for the included studies. The SUCRA values are shown in Figure 7, and the probability ranking results show that the advantages and disadvantages of different interventions are ranked in the following order: BT + ES > BT + BF + ES > PTNS > PFMT + TTNS > PFMT + ES > PFMT > SNS > TTNS > Placebo > Acupuncture > BT + BF > BT > BT + MStim. There were 78 pairwise comparisons in the network meta-analysis, of which, four were statistically significant ( < 0.05). BT + ES, BT + BF + ES, and PTNS were superior to BT alone. BT + ES were superior to BT + MStim, and there were no significant differences among the other interventions.

4.2. Nocturia Frequency

A Bayesian mesh meta-analysis of nocturia frequency was conducted on the included studies. The SUCRA values are shown in Figure 8, and the probability ranking results show that the advantages and disadvantages of different interventions were ranked in the following order: BT + BF + ES > PTNS > PFMT + ES > BT + ES > BT + BF > SNS > BT + MStim > PFMT + TTNS > TTNS > PFMT > placebo > acupuncture > BT, with 78 pairwise comparisons in the network meta-analysis, and 18 of which were statistically significant ( < 0.05). BT + BF + ES were superior to 11 treatments, except PFMT + ES; PTNS was superior to TTNS, placebo, acupuncture, and BT; PFMT + ES, BT + ES, and BT + BF were superior to BT, and there were no significant differences among the other interventions.

5. Discussion

Physical and rehabilitation therapies for OAB are either single or combined. According to this network meta-analysis, all therapies can reduce the daytime micturition frequency or nocturia frequency of OAB to a certain extent. Combined with the improvement in daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency, PTNS in single therapy and BT + ES and BT + BF + ES in combination therapy may be effective therapies for OAB treatment. There was no significant difference in PTNS, BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES.

Bladder training (BT), as the first-line recommended therapy for female incontinence can reduce the frequency of urination [20], which is consistent with the results of this network meta-analysis. However, only BT can improve the frequency of urination to a limited extent; therefore, Firinci et al., Rizvi et al., and Phillips et al. tried to find a better combination therapy based on BT [21–23]. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that BT + ES and BT + BF + ES showed better therapeutic effects in controlling daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency, and that aging leads to a reduction in bladder and urethral function [6, 24, 25]. RCT studies included in this network meta-analysis used transvaginal electrodes for electrical stimulation therapy, which can effectively reduce pudendal nerve afferents or inhibit detrusor activity through current stimulation [26, 27], thus improving OAB symptoms. In these two RCT studies, ES was treated three days a week with a single treatment time of 20 minutes for 24 times, i.e., the total treatment time was 8 weeks. ES therapy settings were as follows: 10 HZ stimulation parameters, work-rest cycle 5–10 s, pulse width 100 ms. Symmetrical biphasic pulses were adjusted between 1 and 100 mA depending on the patient’s discomfort level [4, 21]. Based on the improvement in daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency, this setting seems reasonable. BT + ES can effectively reduce the daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency, patients with ES therapy have good tolerance, and adverse reactions include discomfort and vaginal infection [4, 28]. Whether there is a better setting method for electrical stimulation and therapy course needs further attention in future studies, as it can guide patients to correct contraction control of pelvic floor muscle activity, thus making pelvic floor muscle training more effective [29]. As seen from the RANK plot, BT + BF + ES is the best therapy for improving nocturia frequency and one of the best interventions to improve daytime micturition frequency. In practice, biofeedback can be used at the same time as ES, and the treatment time needs to be extended each time, with good acceptance by patients [21]. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), which is a minimally invasive treatment, uses a fine needle inserted 5 cm cephalad from the medial malleolus and posterior to the edge of the tibia [30, 31]. The sacral plexus (S2–S4) is stimulated to reach the sacral urination center by stimulating the afferents of the tibial nerve (which contains the parasympathetic plexus of the bladder), and detrusor relaxation is induced by the inhibition of parasympathetic motor neurons [30, 32]. Because PTNS is a minimally invasive treatment, some scholars have proposed a noninvasive treatment for TTNS that replaces fine needles with surface electrodes. In the study by Sonmez et al., Ramírez-García et al., and Zonić-Imamović et al., PTNS and TTNS had similar clinical effects [31, 33, 34], but the results of this network meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference between PTNS and TTNS in the improvement of the daytime micturition frequency, but the probability ranking of RANK was better for PTNS than TTNS. PTNS was better than TTNS in improving nocturia frequency, possibly because fine needle aspiration enables electrical stimulation to act directly on the nerve and the effect is more precise; however, PTNS has more adverse reactions than TTNS [31, 32].

The therapies included in this network meta-analysis all improved symptoms of OAB, with therapy durations ranging from 8 to 12 weeks; however, according to existing studies, most of these improvements were time-limited, and symptoms of OAB gradually worsened as treatment was stopped for longer [25, 32, 35, 36]. The effective control of OAB in the long term is worthy of further study, including physical and rehabilitation therapies, such as BT, behavioral therapy, PFMT, and TTNS, which can be independently treated at home [31, 35, 37], but PTNS, BF, and ES, etc., need to be carried out by professionals in medical institutions with professional equipment [4, 21, 30, 33]. PTNS, BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES can be the priority therapy when circumstances permit.

The strengths of our network meta-analysis include the following: (1) minimizing publication bias, we searched all domains using keyword combinations; (2) faced with different research methods, we only included randomized controlled trials; (3) the results of the study combined direct and indirect comparisons; (4) Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted [38] to compare the treatment effects of different physical and rehabilitation therapies on OAB; and (5) posterior probabilities and SUCRA were used to distinguish differences between the 12 physiotherapy and rehabilitation therapies. However, these are some limitations to this network meta-analysis: (1) the number of included studies and patients was small; (2) characteristics vary among different studies, which may have a potential impact on the results of the research; and (3) many symptom evaluation indicators and evaluation methods of OAB lack a standardized and unified evaluation system; (4) only two representative indicators of daytime micturition frequency and nocturia frequency were selected; (5) the duration of the intervention included in the studies was short; and (6) there was a lack of assessment of the long-term effect of improvement in OAB symptoms. Therefore, larger randomized controlled trials that include assessments of long-term improvement in OAB symptoms are needed to enrich the conclusions of this network meta-analysis.

6. Conclusions

Different physical and rehabilitation therapies can improve the symptoms of OAB. Each institution should choose physical and rehabilitation therapies according to its own setup and personnel base. PTNS, BT + ES, and BT + BF + ES can be considered priority therapies when the situation permits.

Data Availability

All data and codes are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in publishing this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Jingwen Bai and Ping Wang participated in the study design and in writing the manuscript. Jingwen Bai, Yilan Tian, and Yiran Wang participated in the data collection. Jingwen Bai and Yilan Tian analyzed the data. Jingwen Bai and Xiaofang Zhang interpreted the data and critically reviewed the paper under the supervision of Ping Wang. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2009100).

References

B. T. Haylen, D. de Ridder, R. M. Freeman et al., “An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 29, no. 1, Article ID 19941278, pp. 4–20, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, K. Xu, H. Hu et al., “Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on health related quality of life of overactive bladder in China,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 30, no. 8, Article ID 21826714, pp. 1448–1455, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Stewart, J. B. Van Rooyen, G. W. Cundiff et al., “Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 20, no. 6, Article ID 12811491, pp. 327–336, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Robinson, L. Cardozo, I. Milsom et al., “Oestrogens and overactive bladder,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 33, no. 7, Article ID 23868110, pp. 1086–1091, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D. Moreira, R. C. S. Neves, A. F. Neto et al., “A population-based survey of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and symptom-specific bother: results from the Brazilian LUTS epidemiology study (BLUES),” World Journal of Urology, vol. 31, no. 6, Article ID 23515960, pp. 1451–1458, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Jacomo, A. T. Alves, A. Lucio, P. A. Garcia, D. C. R. Lorena, and J. B. de Sousa, “Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial,” Clinics, vol. 75, Article ID e1477, 2020 Jan 10.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. O. Bellette, P. C. Rodrigues-Palma, V. Hermann, C. Riccetto, M. Bigozzi, and J. M. Olivares, “Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the management of overactive bladder: a prospective and controlled study,” Actas Urológicas Españolas, vol. 33, no. 1, Article ID 19462726, pp. 58–63, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jiao, C. L. Shi, J. Y. He, D. L. Wu, G. W. Shi, and Y. Y. Wang, “Yun's optimized pelvic floor training therapy for idiopathic moderate overactive bladder with sexual dysfunction in young and middle-aged women,” Zhonghua Nan ke Xue, vol. 25, no. 8, Article ID 32227713, pp. 707–712, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Bacchi Ambrosano Giarreta, J. Milhem Haddad, H. C. Souza de Carvalho Fusco, E. Chada Baracat, R. A. Casarotto, and E. Alves Gonçalves Ferreira, “Is the addition of vaginal electrical stimulation to transcutaneous tibial nerve electrical stimulation more effective for overactive bladder treatment? A randomized controlled trial,” Actas Urológicas Españolas, vol. 45, no. 1, Article ID 32660872, pp. 64–72, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Voorham, S. De Wachter, T. W. L. Van den Bos et al., “The effect of EMG biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle therapy on symptoms of the overactive bladder syndrome in women: a randomized controlled trial,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 36, no. 7, Article ID 27869312, pp. 1796–1803, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Corcos, M. Przydacz, L. Campeau et al., “CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder,” Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. E142–E173, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Lightner, A. Gomelsky, L. Souter, and S. P. Vasavada, “Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment 2019,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 202, no. 3, Article ID 31039103, pp. 558–563, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mostafaei, S. F. Shariat, H. Salehi-Pourmehr et al., “The clinical pharmacology of the medical treatment for overactive bladder in adults,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 707–720, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Choi, J. H. Bae, C. Y. Oh et al., “Clinical efficacy of solifenacin in the management of diabetes mellitus-associated versus idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms: a multicenter prospective study,” Int Neurourol J, vol. 22, no. 1, Article ID 29609421, pp. 51–57, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Kim and K. S. Lee, “Persistence and compliance with medication management in the treatment of overactive bladder,” Investigative and Clinical Urology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 84–93, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Reyblat and D. A. Ginsberg, “Augmentation enterocystoplasty in overactive bladder: is there still a role?” Current Urology Reports, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID 20734172, pp. 432–439, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Article ID 33782057, p. n71, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. T. Higgins and S. Green, Eds.in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S, 2011.
H. Fathy, H. H. Hamama, N. El-Wassefy, and S. H. Mahmoud, “Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 26, no. 5, Article ID 35320383, pp. 3807–3822, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Nambiar, R. Bosch, F. Cruz et al., “EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence,” European Urology, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 29398262, pp. 596–609, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Firinci, N. Yildiz, H. Alkan, and Z. Aybek, “Which combination is most effective in women with idiopathic overactive bladder, including bladder training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 39, no. 8, Article ID 32960999, pp. 2498–2508, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Rizvi, N. G. Chughtai, and N. Kapadia, “Effects of bladder training and pelvic floor muscle training in female patients with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled trial,” Urologia Internationalis, vol. 100, no. 4, Article ID 29672306, pp. 420–427, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Phillips, “Sacral neuromodulation system for treating refractory overactive bladder,” British Journal of Nursing, vol. 29, no. 18, Article ID 33035097, pp. S30–S37, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. de Groat, D. Griffiths, and N. Yoshimura, “Neural control of the lower urinary tract,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID 25589273, pp. 327–396, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Teixeira Alve, P. Azevedo Garcia, R. Henriques Jácomo et al., “Effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation at two different thresholds for overactive bladder symptoms in older women: a randomized controlled clinical trial,” Maturitas, vol. 135, Article ID 32252963, pp. 40–46, 2020 May.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. V. Scaldazza, C. Morosetti, R. Giampieretti, R. Lorenzetti, and M. Baroni, “Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study,” International Braz J Urol, vol. 43, no. 1, Article ID 28124534, pp. 121–126, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Wang, Y. Y. Wang, and M. C. Chen, “Single-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder,” Urology, vol. 63, no. 1, Article ID 14751349, pp. 61–66, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jerez-Roig, D. L. Souza, A. Espelt, M. Costa-Marín, and A. M. Belda-Molina, “Pelvic floor electrostimulation in women with urinary incontinence and/or overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review,” Actas Urológicas Españolas, vol. 37, no. 7, Article ID 23246103, pp. 429–444, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Özlü, N. Yıldız, and Ö Öztekin, “Comparison of the efficacy of perineal and intravaginal biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 36, no. 8, Article ID 28345778, pp. 2132–2141, 2017 Nov.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bykoviene, R. Kubilius, R. Aniuliene, E. Bartuseviciene, and A. Bartusevicius, “Pelvic floor muscle training with or without tibial nerve stimulation and lifestyle changes have comparable effects on the overactive bladder. A randomized clinical trial,” Urology Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 186–192, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sonmez, N. Yildiz, and H. Alkan, “Efficacy of percutaneous and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in women with idiopathic overactive bladder: a prospective randomised controlled trial,” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 65, no. 1, Article ID 101486, 2022 Jan.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Martin-Garcia and J. Crampton, “A single-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in Overactive Bladder symptoms in women responders to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS),” Physiotherapy, vol. 105, no. 4, Article ID 30862384, pp. 469–475, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ramírez-García, L. Blanco-Ratto, S. Kauffmann, A. Carralero-Martínez, and E. Sánchez, “Efficacy of transcutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve compared to percutaneous stimulation in idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: randomized control trial,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 38, no. 1, Article ID 30311692, pp. 261–268, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zonić-Imamović, O. Sinanović, M. Imamović, M. Muftić, S. Janković, and M. Bazardžanović, “Effects of transcutaneous and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in Bosnian female patients with an idiopathic overactive urinary bladder,” Acta Medica Academica, vol. 50, no. 2, Article ID 34847676, pp. 235–243, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mallmann, L. Ferla, M. P. Rodrigues et al., “Comparison of parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized clinical trial,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 250, Article ID 32464435, pp. 203–208, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ozdedeli, H. Karapolat, and Y. Akkoc, “Comparison of intravaginal electrical stimulation and trospium hydrochloride in women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 4, Article ID 20212061, pp. 342–351, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Alkis, M. Sevim, İ Güven Kartal, A. Baser, H. İbrahim İvelik, and B. Aras, “Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) protocols for women with refractory overactive bladder (OAB): a prospective randomised trial,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 75, no. 9, Article ID e14342, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liu, Y. Duan, W. Cui et al., “Skin antiseptics in venous puncture site disinfection for preventing blood culture contamination: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 59, Article ID 27222460, pp. 156–162, 2016 Jul.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Jingwen Bai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

649

Downloads

535

Citations