International Journal of Combinatorics

Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4546509, 14 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4546509

## A Generalized Inverse Binomial Summation Theorem and Some Hypergeometric Transformation Formulas

Department of Mathematics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Received 17 July 2016; Accepted 24 August 2016

Academic Editor: Toufik Mansour

Copyright © 2016 S. M. Ripon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A generalized binomial theorem is developed in terms of Bell polynomials and by applying this identity some sums involving inverse binomial coefficient are calculated. A technique is derived for calculating a class of hypergeometric transformation formulas and also some curious series identities.

#### 1. Introduction

Some of the most recent developments are on the use of different techniques for obtaining sums of hypergeometric series. In this paper, we present a new method for calculating the following summations and also a generalized theorem related to these series is investigated. We investigated the following summations formula with some restrictions for the functions :We assume that the function has no poles at , where is an integer ranged from .

As it turns out, the above summation formula for the constant function gives us a new generalized hypergeometric transformation formula of the typeWe further investigated some series closely related to the famous Roger-Ramanujan identities.In our present investigation dealing with the series identity, we shall also make use of other such higher transcendental functions, the Riemann Zeta function and Hurwitz Zeta function, which are defined bywhere is the generalized harmonic numbers defined byIn the above identity we used the notation for denoting the generalized polygamma function of order which is given by the th times logarithmic derivative of Gamma function denotes the famous Euler-Mascheroni constant. The derivatives of generalized harmonic number are given: And we used for the Pochhammer symbol defined (for and in terms of the Gamma function) by The generalized hypergeometric function is defined byThe notation for generalized hypergeometric functions was introduced by Pochhammer in 1870 and modified by Barnes [1] and later by Maier and Slater [2]. A number of notational variations are commonly used. Most common notation is introduced by Graham et al. [3] using square brackets and a semicolon.

The complete Bell polynomials of order are defined as First few terms of these polynomials can be derived by

#### 2. Main Results

Theorem 1. *For integers , where and .*

*Proof. *Let us define a function where such thatWe also assume the function has no poles at for each and such thatWe introduce another notation for the th derivative with respect to of the defined function :Furthermore, we see the series also defined for . It can be extended to the interval , because when , where is a positive integer, the further terms of the series just vanish.Making use of certain special properties of Bell polynomials we can evaluate successive derivative of a given function. Let us consider a function which has a Taylor series expansion around ; the detailed procedure of these kinds is extensively discussed in the paper [4]. Following the same process discussed in [5, 6] we can write the following elegant identity by virtue of Bell polynomials: The following identity can be recovered from the same method used in [5, page 8]: represents the th order derivative harmonic number with respect to . The derivative of harmonic numbers can be evaluated by using the formula given in Hence, upon considering (18) and (19), we findThe above identity was derived extensively in [5] and a modified version was calculated in [7]. Now differentiating (13) times with respect to and considering the case , where is a positive integer as well as using the definition from (15), we can deriveMaking use of the identity derived in (20) we findFrom the asymptotic properties of Bell polynomials we haveConsidering the above property in (23), for and are both positive integers, we can readily evaluate the following limits: Considering next few cases, we can move to final relationwhere is defined as in (19). Recalling the properties of Bell polynomials mentioned in (25) if we consider the limit for we observe that for every the limiting value vanishes but it surprisingly gives us limiting value for . Furthermore, expanding the product of generalized harmonic numbers in asymptotic form with Big notation, we can further deduce with and . Substituting the above asymptotic identity in (26) we find After some tedious calculations we findIn view of the known identity for Bell polynomials,We can finally obtain a closed form for the limitSubstituting the limiting value of (26) in (31), we can readily obtain a closed form for the required limitApplying the above limiting value, we haveFinally by combining (22) and (33), we finally obtain Theorem 1.

Theorem 2. *For integers ,where and .*

*Proof. *The proof is similar to the previous one. Similarly as before we consider the functionThen by the same process and with same restrictions we can easily obtain Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. *For integers , and , *

*Proof. *Let us take as a constant function in Theorem 1:It proves the first part of Theorem 3. Writing the function and as Hyper geometric functions defined in first section we can deriveFinally combining (37) and (38) we can easily obtain Theorem 3.

Theorem 4. *For integers and , *

*Proof. *Considering Theorem 2 for and using the property of bell polynomials,Taking into account an identity derived in Boyadzhiev’s paper [8] titled “Harmonic Number Identities via Euler’s Transform,” Differentiating the identity in (41) with respect to and using the known formula , Considering the above expression together with (40) we can conclude Theorem 2. Special case of Theorem 2 for can be found in [5]. Theorem 2 also generalizes many identities derived in [9]. The finite summation in the right-hand side of Theorem 2 can be obtained from [7, 10] for different values of . Interested readers can also find some computer assisted proofs of these identities in [11].

Theorem 5. *For integers ,*

*Proof. *Setting , and in Theorem 2 and by virtue of Bell polynomialsThe following harmonic number identity can be found in many texts of mathematical literatures. Mainly Chu and De Donno [12] and Paule and Schneider [11] discussed these types of summation formulas in great detail.Differentiating (45) two times with respect to and using the formula involving differentiation of generalized harmonic numbers stated in the first section, Finally substituting the expressions of (45) and (46) in (44), we easily obtain Theorem 5.

*Some Special Corollaries*

Corollary 6. *For integers , Using the following identity (48) given in Volume 2 of Gould’s book [13] and considering Theorem 2 for ; andSome special cases of this formula can be found in the published literature [14–16].*

Corollary 7. *For integers ,Considering the following identity (50) illustrated in Volume 2 of Gould’s book [13] and using Theorem 2 for ,*

Corollary 8. *For integers and ,*

*Proof. *The following identity is given in Volume 5 of Gould’s book [13]:Considering Theorem 2 for ; and also using (52) we can immediately find Corollary 8.

Corollary 9. *For integers , , and are positive integers,Using the following identity (54) given in Volume 5 of Gould’s book [13] and considering Theorem 2 for Terminating version of these kinds of hypergeometric series goes back to Bailey [15].*

*Differentiation of Laguerre Polynomials with respect to Its Order*. Let be the Laguerre Polynomials defined by

Corollary 10. *For integers ,Using the previous identity (55) for Laguerre Polynomials and considering Theorem 2 for we can easily derive Corollary 10.*

Corollary 11. *For integers , and , Making use of the following identity (58) derived in [17] and considering Theorem 2 for ,*

Corollary 12. *For integers , and , Making use of the following identity (60) derived in [17] and considering Theorem 2 for ,*

Corollary 13. *For and integers , where are Stirling numbers of the second kind. Considering the following identity (62) given in [8] for and applying Theorem 2 for, ,*

Corollary 14. *For and integers ,*

*Proof. *Substituting in Theorem 3,Using Newton’s binomial theorem we haveThis impliesSubstituting the value of from (66) in (64) and after some modifications we can obtain Corollary 14. The modified version of Corollary 14 can be found in [18]. Zeilberger proved quite interesting properties of these types of hypergeometric functions in [19].

Corollary 15. *For integers ,*

*Proof. *Substituting and in Theorem 3 and using the property of Bell polynomials,Another classical result, special case of the Vandermonde Convolution, is given byHence we haveConsidering the value of from (70) in (68) we finally recover Corollary 15.

Corollary 16. *For integers ,*

*Proof. *Substituting and in Theorem 3 and using the property of Bell polynomials,Considering another classical result illustrated in Gould’s book [13] Volume 5 which first appeared in American Math Monthly, for the case , we have Hence we haveSubstituting the value of from (74) in (72) we can immediately obtain Corollary 16. Various special cases of Corollary 16 can be found in several works of Wimp [20, 21].

Corollary 17. *For integers ,*

*Proof. *Substituting and in Theorem 3 and using the property of Bell polynomials,Considering another classical result illustrated in volume 5 of Gould’s book [13] which first appeared in American Math Monthly, considering for the case that hence we have Now differentiating the above identities with respect to and using the definition of polygamma function, We also define