Table of Contents
International Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 2011, Article ID 165919, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/165919
Research Article

The Selfish Grandma Gene: The Roles of the X-Chromosome and Paternity Uncertainty in the Evolution of Grandmothering Behavior and Longevity

1Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QY, UK
2Zentrum für Philosophie und Grundlagen der Wissenschaft, Universität Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Straße 10 C, 35394 Giessen, Germany

Received 6 October 2010; Revised 7 December 2010; Accepted 18 January 2011

Academic Editor: Alberto Civetta

Copyright © 2011 Molly Fox et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. D. Hamilton, “The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. D. Hamilton, “The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–52, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. G. Anderson, “The life histories of American stepfathers in evolutionary perspective,” Human Nature, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 307–333, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. G. Anderson, H. Kaplan, and J. Lancaster, “Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers—I: reports from Albuquerque men,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 405–431, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Santrock, R. Warshak, C. Lindbergh, and L. Meadows, “Children's and parents' observed social behavior in stepfather families,” Child Development, vol. 53, pp. 472–480, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. D. Borders, L. K. Black, and B. K. Pasley, “Are adopted children and their parents at greater risk for negative outcomes?” Family Relations, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 237–241, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Barber, Why Parents Matter: Parental Investment and Child Outcomes, Bergin & Garvey, London, UK, 2000.
  8. W. R. Rice, S. Gavrilets, and U. Friberg, “The evolution of sex-specific grandparental harm,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 277, no. 1694, pp. 2727–2735, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. K. Hawkes, J. F. O'Connell, and N. G. Blurton Jones, “Hadza women's time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans,” Current Anthropology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 551–577, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Hawkes, J. F. O'Connell, N. G. Blurton Jones, H. Alvarez, and E. L. Charnov, “The grandmother hypothesis and human evolution,” in Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, pp. 231–252, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Hawkes, “Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity,” American Journal of Human Biology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 380–400, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. M. Fox, R. Sear, J. Beise, G. Ragsdale, E. Voland, and L. A. Knapp, “Grandma plays favourites: X-chromosome relatedness and sex-specific childhood mortality,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 277, no. 1681, pp. 567–573, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Wilder, “Do grandmothers who play favorites sow seeds of genomic conflict?” BioEssays, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 457–460, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. E. R. Chrastil, W. M. Getz, H. A. Euler, and P. T. Starks, “Paternity uncertainty overrides sex chromosome selection for preferential grandparenting,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 206–223, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. R. Rice, S. Gavrilets, and U. Friberg, “Sexually antagonistic "zygotic drive" of the sex chromosomes,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 4, no. 12, Article ID e1000313, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. E. Voland and J. Beise, “Opposite effects of maternal and paternal grandmothers on infant survival in historical Krummhörn,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 435–443, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. S. Jamison, L. L. Cornell, P. L. Jamison, and H. Nakazato, “Are all grandmothers equal? A review and a preliminary test of the “grandmother hypothesis” in Tokugawa Japan,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. H. A. Euler and B. Weitzel, “Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy,” Human Nature, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. F. Kachel, L. S. Premo, and J. J. Hublin, “Grandmothering and naturalselection,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. In press.
  20. G. Ragsdale, “Grandmothering in Cambridgeshire, 1770–1861,” Human Nature, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 301–317, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Hawkes, J. F. O'Connell, N. G. Blurton Jones, H. Alvarez, and E. L. Charnov, “Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1336–1339, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Hill and A. M. Hurtado, “The evolution of premature reproductive senescence and menopause in human females—an evaluation of the “grandmother hypothesis”,” Human Nature, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 313–350, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Lahdenperä, V. Lummaa, S. Helle, M. Tremblay, and A. F. Russell, “Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women,” Nature, vol. 428, no. 6979, pp. 178–181, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. K. Skorecki, S. Selig, S. Blazer et al., “Y chromosomes of Jewish priests,” Nature, vol. 385, no. 6611, pp. 32–36, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  25. L. W. Simmons, R. C. Firman, G. Rhodes, and M. Peters, “Human sperm competition: testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 297–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. B. Sykes and C. Irven, “Surnames the Y chromosome,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1417–1419, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  27. M. A. Bellis, K. Hughes, S. Hughes, and J. R. Ashton, “Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 749–754, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. A. M. Johnson, C. H. Mercer, B. Erens et al., “Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours,” Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9296, pp. 1835–1842, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. S. Platek and T. K. Shackelford, Female Infidelity and Paternal Uncertainty, 2006.
  30. S. Macintyre and A. Sooman, “Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening,” Lancet, vol. 338, no. 8771, pp. 869–871, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  31. R. A. Johnstone and M. A. Cant, “The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 277, no. 1701, pp. 3765–3771, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed