International Journal of Evolutionary Biology

International Journal of Evolutionary Biology / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Evolutionary Mechanisms of Microbial Genomes 2012

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 813015 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/813015

Victor Satler Pylro, Luciano de Souza Vespoli, Gabriela Frois Duarte, Karla Suemy Clemente Yotoko, "Detection of Horizontal Gene Transfers from Phylogenetic Comparisons", International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 813015, 7 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/813015

Detection of Horizontal Gene Transfers from Phylogenetic Comparisons

Academic Editor: Hiromi Nishida
Received09 Feb 2012
Revised22 Mar 2012
Accepted23 Mar 2012
Published23 May 2012

Abstract

Bacterial phylogenies have become one of the most important challenges for microbial ecology. This field started in the mid-1970s with the aim of using the sequence of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S) tool to infer bacterial phylogenies. Phylogenetic hypotheses based on other sequences usually give conflicting topologies that reveal different evolutionary histories, which in some cases may be the result of horizontal gene transfer events. Currently, one of the major goals of molecular biology is to understand the role that horizontal gene transfer plays in species adaptation and evolution. In this work, we compared the phylogenetic tree based on 16S with the tree based on dszC, a gene involved in the cleavage of carbon-sulfur bonds. Bacteria of several genera perform this survival task when living in environments lacking free mineral sulfur. The biochemical pathway of the desulphurization process was extensively studied due to its economic importance, since this step is expensive and indispensable in fuel production. Our results clearly show that horizontal gene transfer events could be detected using common phylogenetic methods with gene sequences obtained from public sequence databases.

1. Introduction

The discussion concerning bacteria phylogenies has become one of the most important aspects of microbial ecology. In the mid-1970s, Woese and his collaborators proposed and began assembling a significant database of sequence information based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA 16S). The current universal tree is based on this [16], since it is easily sequenced (±1,500 nucleotides) and widely available in sequence databases (Gen-Bank, EMBL) [7, 8]. However, phylogenetic hypotheses based on several other genes result in conflicting topologies and reveal different evolutionary histories. In many cases, especially within bacteria, these may be the result of horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) [9, 10], which are regarded as a crucial mechanism of increasing genetic variability among bacteria [1113]. Currently, one of the major goals of molecular biology is to understand the role that HGT plays in species adaptation and evolution [10, 14, 15]. The presence of HGT in bacteria has been reported for several years, suggesting that for some genes the tree of life becomes a net [16]. HGT is dominant among various groups of genes in prokaryotes such as antibiotic resistance, carbon source utilization, organic contaminant degradation, and freeze tolerance genes [12, 13]. However, there is some evidence of HGT in housekeeping genes such as those for replication, transcription, and translation as well [10, 17, 18].

Sulphur is the third most abundant element in petroleum (after carbon and hydrogen), and its release contributes to air pollution by causing acid rain [19, 20]. For this reason, sulphur regulations have continued to become more stringent and it is necessary to remove sulphur oxides from fossil fuels during the refining process. Most inorganic and simple organic sulphur can be removed by hydrodesulphurization, the technique currently used by most petroleum refineries, but, in petroleum, the majority of sulphur is found in dibenzothiophene (DBT) and its derivatives, which can only be removed through a specific biological mechanism called biodesulphurization [21]. Several studies have investigated the development of aerobic microbial desulphurisation pathways [2224].

Some bacteria can desulphurize DBT to 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) through the sulphur-specific degradation pathway (4S pathway) without destroying the hydrocarbon skeleton [22, 2426]. In natural environments, the cleavage of carbon-sulfur bonds in molecules such as DBT liberates sulfur, making it available as a nutrient to support the growth of bacteria in environments poor in mineral sulfur [27]. These bacteria have been assigned to a number of genera including Rhodococcus [21, 28], Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas [24]. Species of other bacteria genera, such as Brevibacterium sp. strain DO [29], strains identified as Arthrobacter spp. [30], and Gordonia sp. strain CYKS1 [31], are also able to use this pathway.

The pSOX plasmid [28], or dsz genes [32, 33], responsible for the sulfur oxidation in DBT, have been cloned, sequenced, and studied, generating considerable knowledge of these pathway enzymes [28, 32, 34]. The 4S pathway consists of three genes designated dsz A, B, and C. Studies have shown that the product of dszC directly converts DBT to DBTO2 and the products of dszA and dszB act together to convert DBTO2 to 2-HBP. The operon dsz occupies a 4 kb gene locus in a 120 kb linear plasmid in bacteria Rhodococcus erythropolis strain IGTS8 [28, 32, 3537]. The plasmid nature of the dsz genes increases the probability of successful transfers, and the availability of the dszC sequences in GenBank allows the construction of phylogenetic hypothesis based on this gene, in order to compare it with the 16S.

In this work, we aim to demonstrate the utility of phylogenetic methods based on molecular data to help in studies of horizontal transfer of functional genes in bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Nucleotide Sequences

The nucleotide sequences used in this study were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information-GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). For analyses involving the dszC gene, 18 sequences were selected (Table 1), representing all genera and/or species with dszC sequences available in the database as of March 2012. We also searched for the other two genes of the operon, dszA and dszB, but they are underrepresented in GenBank and phylogenetic trees could not be constructed based on these genes. For the 16S gene, we chose 39 sequences, including at least two sequences of at least 1400 bp from each genera and/or species in the dszC tree (Table 2).


Bacteria speciesNCBI accession numbers

Acidovorax delafieldiiDQ062154.1
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAY960127.1
Bacillus subtilisAB076745.1
Mycobacterium sp. strain G3AB070603.1
Brevibacillus brevisDQ062161.1
Gordonia alkanivorans strain 1BAY678116.1
Gordonia alkanivoransAY714057.1
Gordonia alkanivorans strain RIPI90AEU364831.1
Gordonia sp. strain CYKS2AY396519.1
Mycobacterium goodii strain X7BEU527978.1
Rhodococcus erythropolisAY714058.1
Rhodococcus erythropolisAY294404.1
Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8L37363.1
Rhodococcus sp. strain IIPS7DQ198086.1
Rhodococcus sp. strain SDUZAWQAY789136.1
Rhodococcus sp. strain XPAY278323.1
Synthetic construct dibenzothiophene monooxygenase (sequence from Rhodococcus sp. LY822)EF570783.1


Bacteria speciesNCBI accession number

Acidovorax delafieldii strain 179EU730925.1
Acidovorax delafieldii strain NBGD35HQ003420.1
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain NBGD13HQ003411.1
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain SJ61GQ140318.1
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain SJ22GQ140317.1
Bacillus subtilis strain DmB55HQ111354.1
Bacillus subtilis strain CCM7HQ108184.1
Bacillus subtilis strain ANctcri3HQ286641.1
Bacillus subtilis strain 13BHQ335318.1
Brevibacillus brevis strain NBGD26HQ003422.1
Brevibacillus brevis strain H2HM449127.1
Brevibacillus brevis strain EIF87HM480358.1
Brevibacillus brevis strain Hot-1EU327889.1
Gordonia alkalivoransY18054.1
Gordonia alkanivorans strain DSM 44187AY995556.1
Gordonia alkanivorans strain TPR13EU373422.1
Gordonia alkanivorans strain HKI 0136NR_026488.1
Gordonia amicalis strain IEGMNR_028735.1
Gordonia amicalis strain CC-MJ-2aEU266484.1
Gordonia amicalis strain CC-MJ-15bEU266486.1
Gordonia amicalisAF101418.1
Mycobacterium avium strain M214GU142929.1
Mycobacterium avium complex strain 27497EF611344.1
Mycobacterium avium strain ATCC 19698EF521896.1
Mycobacterium avium strain ATCC 25291EF521895.1
Mycobacterium avium strain IWGMT49EF521892.1
Mycobacterium goodiiY12872.1
Mycobacterium goodii strain M069NR_029341.1
Mycobacterium goodii strain X7BAF513815.1
Rhodococcus erythropolis strain ZJB-0910GU726138.1
Rhodococcus erythropolis strain MJ2GU991529.1
Rhodococcus erythropolis strain 13648EEU741153.1
Rhodococcus erythropolis strain e1EU434599.1
Rhodococcus sp. NKCM 2512AB591806.1
Rhodococcus sp. BY44FR690460.1
Rhodococcus sp. ITP08FR667175.1
Rhodococcus sp. SH15HM590053.1
Rhodococcus equi strain ATCC 6939FJ468344.1
Rhodococcus erythropolis strain XPDQ074453.1

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were performed with four different methods: neighbour joining (NJ) using the program MEGA 5.0 [38]; maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) using the program PAUP* [39]; Bayesian inference (BA) using the program MrBayes [40]. For NJ, ML, and BA, we chose the best nucleotide substitution model using the programs Mega 5.0 [38], ModelTest [41], and MrModelTest [42]. The chosen models are shown in Table 3. We used the Tree Bisection and Reconnection heuristic search method to search for the MP and ML trees. The MP tree started with a random tree, while the ML tree started with an NJ tree. To infer the tree through the BA, we run two independent analyses with four chains each (one cold and three hot chains), started with four different random trees modified through 5,000,000 generations of MCMC. We checked the likelihood of the resulting topologies and burned-out 25% of the trees (to keep those within the area of the best likelihoods) to construct the consensus tree. The robustness of each node of the tree was obtained by the bootstrap test (MV, MP, and NJ); the posterior probability was calculated by the frequency of each node in the consensus BA tree.


MethodGeneNucleotide substitution modelGamma distributionInvariable sites proportion

NJdszCTamura-Nei0.71
16STamura-Nei0.69
MLdszCGTR+G0.8291
16SGTR+G+I0.81250.3667
BAdszCGTR+G0.8291
16SGTR+G+I0.81260.3667

2.3. Phylogenetic Network Estimation of dszC Genes

Given the phylogenetic hypothesis for the dszC gene, we constructed a network using the most related haplotypes with statistical-parsimony analyses [43]. The graphic network was constructed using TCS vers. 1.21 [44]. This method starts by calculating the overall limits of parsimony for the complete data set using a statistic from neutral coalescent theory [45, 46]. Although this method has been used extensively with restriction site and nucleotide sequence data to estimate population level genealogies when divergences are low (intra-specific data) [46, 47], it also proved to be reliable at higher divergences, outperforming parsimony and parsimony with bootstrapping [48].

3. Results and Discussion

The BA hypotheses for the 16S gene are shown in Figure 1, which presents the expected pattern of species grouped within their respective genera. The different phylogenetic methods resulted in very similar tree topologies (data not shown) and robust bootstrap values for NJ, ML, MP, and BA posterior probability of the branches. The only exception was the branch containing representatives from the Rhodococcus spp. (in red), which showed low bootstrap value in MP (58%), low posterior probability value in BA (0.61), and bootstrap values for NJ and ML < 50%. Although the convergence of results using different phylogenetic methods has been considered good evidence that the correct phylogeny was obtained [49], total genome phylogenies show that different phylogenetic methods can provide incongruent phylogenies [50, 51]. However, the comparison of 16S sequences is still considered a powerful and accepted tool for deducing phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships among bacteria and is routinely used [4, 5254]. In fact, most of bacteria systematics is based on the topologies generated by this gene [3].

Figure 2, on the other hand, did not group the species by genera. Instead, this figure presents only three branches: the first includes Mycobacterium sp. (strain G3—AB070603.1) and Bacillus subtilis (AB076745.1) sequences; the second groups two sequences of Gordonia alkanivorans (strain 1 B—AY678116.1 and strain RIPI90A—EU364831.1); the third clusters all remaining sequences belonging to all genera included in this work except for Bacillus. It is expected that molecular phylogenies based on single genes lead to apparently conflicting results with alternative branches that present low bootstrap (or posterior probability) values [50]. However, the conflicting topologies shown in Figures 1 and 2 present high bootstrap and posterior probability values in alternative branches, strongly suggesting that the dszC was indeed subjected to horizontal transfer events among these bacteria.

The phylogenetic network estimation (Figure 3) of the dszC haplotypes of the most specious cluster shown in Figure 2 emphasizes the fact that Acidovorax delafieldii (Seq 1), Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Seq 2), Brevibacillus brevis (Seq 3), and Rhodococcus sp. (Seq 11) present identical sequences, which were grouped together as a square within Figure 3, while other haplotypes are displayed as ovals connected to the square by lines with black circles to indicate the maximum number of steps between each pair of haplotypes.

The results presented here, based solely on GenBank data, provide strong evidence that the dszC gene was horizontally transferred among different evolutionary lineages of bacteria. This evidence is reinforced by the fact that the dczC gene is generally found in conjugative plasmids, in the vicinity of insertion sequences, transcribed in the same direction and under the control of a single promoter [35, 37, 55, 56]. Furthermore, another evidence of dszC horizontal transfer is the significant difference of the C+G content of this gene with the C+G content of the entire chromosome of some species studied here (data not shown).

Our results reinforce the importance of public sequence repositories (such as GenBank), which result from a successful policy of requiring the inclusion of gene sequences in public databases in order to publish any research article containing sequence analyses [57, 58]. In addition to the DNA sequence of each entry, GenBank and other public databases include associated metadata, which provide relevant information about the organism whose sequence is available, generally by linking to the articles with the respective sequence [58]. However, the public databases also contain several molecular sequences submitted by researchers who have not published their results. In these cases, there is neither citation information nor any relevant data about the organisms from which the sequences were made, which in most cases makes the sequences useless for in silico works, since diverse knowledge about a given molecular sequence provides an essential first step in developing research hypotheses.

It is easy to generate new sequences and add them to the GenBank database, which contains about 150 million gene sequences as of February 2012. However, GenBank, along with its INSDC (International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration) partners (EMBL & DDBJ), should be treated not only as archival stores of molecular sequence data (a task at which it has been very successful) but also as a starting point for future studies. In this context, it would be helpful if the process of submitting sequences required a minimum of information about the organism from which the sequences were made, as well as the details of the gene sequenced, in order to substantiate future research.

In this sense, our study could be improved if flanking DNA sequences of functional genes such as dszC were available in the databases, since we could then evaluate if one set of dsz genes is flanked by a particular insertion sequence while another cluster is not.

Although laboratory data that demonstrate the transfer by conjugation of plasmids containing dsz genes or transposition of these genes are scarce, their distribution in bacterial cultures strongly supports the hypothesis that these genes are commonly subject to horizontal transfer in nature as evidenced in the present work. For this reason, we conclude that phylogenetic tools can be useful for inferring horizontal transfer events of functional genes such as dszC. Phylogenetic comparisons with other genes traditionally used for this purpose, such as 16S, can provide good information about evolution and functional gene distribution.

Lateral gene transfer events provide a venue for bacterial diversification by rearranging existing capabilities. Because bacterial genomes can maintain only a finite amount of information, they are sampling rather than accumulating sequences, counterbalancing gene acquisition with gene loss. As a result, lateral gene transfer can redefine the ecological niche of a microorganism, in effect promoting bacterial speciation [58]. Although a potential result of interspecific recombination is the uncertainty of species boundaries, the increased mixing of genes and the observed phylogenetic inconsistencies show the history of a gene-transfer-mediated diversification of microorganisms.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M.S. Marcos M. D. Carneiro for help in reviewing the English of this work, M.S. Gilberto de O. Mendes for his help in editing the figures, M.S. Mateus Ferreira Santana for his help in phylogenetic network analyses, and FAPEMIG, CNPq, and CAPES for financial support. This paper is dedicated in memoriam of Aurea C. S. Pylro.

References

  1. C. R. Woese and G. E. Fox, “Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 5088–5090, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. R. Woese, “Bacterial evolution,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 221–271, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. R. Woese, O. Kandler, and M. L. Wheelis, “Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4576–4579, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Winker and C. R. Woese, “A definition of the domains Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya in terms of small subunit ribosomal RNA characteristics,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 305–310, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. J. Olsen, N. Larsen, and C. R. Woese, “The ribosomal RNA database project,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 19, pp. 2017–2021, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  6. B. L. Maidak, G. J. Olsen, N. Larsen, R. Overbeek, M. J. McCaughey, and C. R. Woese, “The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project),” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 109–110, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. L. Coutinho, V. M. De Oliveira, G. P. Manfio, and A. S. Rosado, “Evaluating the microbial diversity of soil samples: methodological innovations.,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 491–503, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  8. D. A. Stahl, “Molecular approaches for the measurement of density, diversity and phylogeny,” in Manual of Environmental Microbiology, C. J. Hurst, G. R. Knudsen, M. J. McInerney, L. D. Stetzenbach, and M. V. Walter, Eds., pp. 102–114, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  9. W. Martin, “Mosaic bacterial chromosomes: a challenge en route to a tree of genomes,” BioEssays, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 99–104, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. W. F. Doolittle, “Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5423, pp. 2124–2128, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Paytubi, J. García, and A. Juárez, “Bacterial Hha-like proteins facilitate incorporation of horizontally transferred DNA,” Central European Journal of Biology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 879–886, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. E. Collins and J. W. Deming, “Abundant dissolved genetic material in Arctic sea ice Part II: viral dynamics during autumn freeze-up,” Polar Biology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1819–1830, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. C. Baños, A. Vivero, S. Aznar et al., “Differential regulation of horizontally acquired and core genome genes by the bacterial modulator H-NS,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, no. 6, Article ID e1000513, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. V. Koonin, “Horizontal gene transfer: The path to maturity,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 725–727, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Boc and V. Makarenkov, “Towards an accurate identification of mosaic genes and partial horizontal gene transfers,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 21, article e144, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. Hilario and J. P. Gogarten, “Horizontal transfer of ATPase genes—the tree of life becomes a net of life,” BioSystems, vol. 31, no. 2-3, pp. 111–119, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. N. Bautista-Zapanta, H. H. Arafat, K. Tanaka, H. Sawada, and K. Suzuki, “Variation of 16S-23S internally transcribed spacer sequence and intervening sequence in rDNA among the three major Agrobacterium species,” Microbiological Research, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 604–612, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Asai, D. Zaporojets, C. Squires, and C. L. Squires, “An Escherichia coli strain with all chromosomal rRNA operons inactivated: complete exchange of rRNA genes between bacteria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1971–1976, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Tanaka, T. Matsui, J. Konishi, K. Maruhashi, and R. Kurane, “Biodesulfurization of benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene by a newly isolated Rhodococcus strain,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 325–328, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Ohshiro and Y. Izumi, “Microbial desulfurization of organic sulfur compounds in petroleum,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  21. F. Davoodi-Dehaghani, M. Vosoughi, and A. A. Ziaee, “Biodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene by a newly isolated Rhodococcus erythropolis strain,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1102–1105, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. H. Chang, Y. K. Chang, K. S. Cho, and H. N. Chang, “Desulfurization of model and diesel oils by resting cells of Gordona sp.,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 193–196, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. F. Duarte, A. S. Rosado, L. Seldin, W. De Araujo, and J. D. Van Elsas, “Analysis of Bacterial Community Structure in Sulfurous-Oil-Containing Soils and Detection of Species Carrying Dibenzothiophene Desulfurization (dsz) Genes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1052–1062, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Boniek, D. Figueiredo, V. S. Pylro, and G. F. Duarte, “Characterization of bacterial strains capable of desulphurisation in soil and sediment samples from Antarctica,” Extremophiles, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 475–481, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. S. Olson, D. C. Stanley, and J. R. Gallagher, “Characterization of intermediates in the microbial desulfurization of dibenzothiophene,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 159–164, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Nekodzuka, T. Nakajima-Kambe, N. Nomura, J. Lu, and T. Nakahara, “Specific desulfurization of dibenzothiophene by Mycobacterium sp. strain G3,” Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. J. Kilbane Ii and S. Le Borgne, “Petroleum biorefining: the selective removal of sulfur, nitrogen, and metals,” in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, V.-D. Rafael and Q.-R. Rodolfo, Eds., Chapter 2, pp. 29–65, Elsevier, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. A. Denome, C. Oldfield, L. J. Nash, and K. D. Young, “Characterization of the desulfurization genes from Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 21, pp. 6707–6716, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Van Afferden, S. Schacht, J. Klein, and H. G. Truper, “Degradation of dibenzothiophene by Brevibacterium sp.DO,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 324–328, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. K. Lee, J. D. Senius, and M. J. Grossman, “Sulfur-specific microbial desulfurization of sterically hindered analogs of dibenzothiophene,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 4362–4366, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. K. Rhee, J. H. Chang, Y. K. Chang, and H. N. Chang, “Desulfurization of dibenzothiophene and diesel oils by a newly isolated Gordona strain, CYKS1,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2327–2331, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  32. C. S. Piddington, B. R. Kovacevich, and J. Rambosek, “Sequence and molecular characterization of a DNA region encoding the dibenzothiophene desulfurization operon of Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 468–475, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Z. Li, C. H. Squires, D. J. Monticello, and J. D. Childs, “Genetic analysis of the dsz promoter and associated regulatory regions of Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 22, pp. 6409–6418, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  34. S. A. Denome, E. S. Olson, and K. D. Young, “Identification and cloning of genes involved in specific desulfurization of dibenzothiophene by Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2837–2843, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. Oldfield, O. Pogrebinsky, J. Simmonds, E. S. Olson, and C. F. Kulpa, “Elucidation of the metabolic pathway for dibenzothiophene desulphurization by Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8 (ATCC 53968),” Microbiology, vol. 143, no. 9, pp. 2961–2973, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. J. Kilbane, “Desulfurization of coal: the microbial solution,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 97–101, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  37. C. Denis-Larose, D. Labbé, H. Bergeron et al., “Conservation of plasmid-encoded dibenzothiophene desulfurization genes in several rhodococci,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 2915–2919, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  38. K. Tamura et al., “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  39. D. L. Swofford, PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2002.
  40. J. P. Huelsenbeck and F. Ronquist, “MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees,” Bioinformatics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 754–755, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  41. D. Posada and K. A. Crandall, “MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution,” Bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 817–818, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. A. A. Nylander, “MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the auhor,” Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. R. Templeton, K. A. Crandall, and C. F. Sing, “A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation,” Genetics, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 619–633, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  44. M. Clement, D. Posada, and K. A. Crandall, “TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1657–1659, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. R. Hudson, “How often are polymorphic restriction sites due to a single mutation?” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  46. J. Gómez-Zurita, E. Petitpierre, and C. Juan, “Nested cladistic analysis, phylogeography and speciation in the Timarcha goettingensis complex (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae),” Molecular Ecology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 557–570, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Vilà, I. R. Amorim, J. A. Leonard et al., “Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2089–2103, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. A. Crandall, “Intraspecific cladogram estimation: accuracy at higher levels of divergence,” Systematic Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 222–235, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  49. A. Rokas, B. I. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll, “Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6960, pp. 798–804, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. O. Jeffroy, H. Brinkmann, F. Delsuc, and H. Philippe, “Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence?” Trends in Genetics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 225–231, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. S. C. Yotoko and S. L. Bonatto, “A phylogenomic appraisal of the evolutionary relationship of Mycoplasmas,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 270–276, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  52. W. G. Weisburg, S. M. Barns, D. A. Pelletier, and D. J. Lane, “16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 697–703, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. M. Hinsa-Leasure, L. Bhavaraju, J. L. M. Rodrigues, C. Bakermans, D. A. Gilichinsky, and J. M. Tiedje, “Characterization of a bacterial community from a Northeast Siberian seacoast permafrost sample,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. Davolos and B. Pietrangeli, “Phylogenetic analysis on the arsenic-resistant bacteria isolated from three different freshwater environments,” Chemistry and Ecology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. D. Young, “Identification and activity of two insertion sequence elements in Rhodococcus sp. strain IGTS8,” Gene, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. A. Williams, “Catabolic plasmids: fast-track bacterial evolution to combat pollution,” Microbiology Today, vol. 31, pp. 168–171, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  57. D. A. Benson, I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D. J. Lipman, J. Ostell, and E. W. Sayers, “GenBank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. D26–D31, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. Miller, C. N. Norton, and I. N. Sarkar, “GenBank and PubMed: how connected are they?” BMC Research Notes, vol. 2, article no. 101, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Victor Satler Pylro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views3982
Downloads762
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.