International Journal of Ecology

International Journal of Ecology / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 541948 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/541948

P. Licata, F. Naccari, V. Lo Turco, R. Rando, G. Di Bella, G. Dugo, "Levels of Cd (II), Mn (II), Pb (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) in Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) from Sicily (Italy) by Derivative Stripping Potentiometry", International Journal of Ecology, vol. 2010, Article ID 541948, 7 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/541948

Levels of Cd (II), Mn (II), Pb (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) in Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) from Sicily (Italy) by Derivative Stripping Potentiometry

Academic Editor: Pavlos Kassomenos
Received19 Oct 2009
Revised11 Jan 2010
Accepted01 Apr 2010
Published03 May 2010

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the concentrations of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Mn, and Zn) in different organs (liver, kidney, muscle, lung, skin, and feathers) of buzzards (Buteo buteo), utilized as a “biological indicator” for environmental contamination, from different areas of Sicily and to investigate the relationships between birds sex, age, and weight and metal levels in these samples. All samples of common buzzards were collected at the “Recovery Center of Wild Fauna” of Palermo, through the Zooprophilactic Institute. Potentiometric stripping analysis (PSA) was used to determine the content of Cd(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) in bird tissues. For toxic metals, the highest levels of Pb were in liver and those of Cd in lung; Zn levels were higher than Cu and Mn in all tissues analyzed. The concentrations in liver, lung, kidney, and muscle could be considered as an indicative of chronic exposure to metals while the presence of metals in skin could be consequential to storing and elimination processes. The found concentrations of metals in the studied matrices required a highly sensitive method for their determination and a simple sample preparation procedure, and the proposed method was well suited for this purpose.

1. Introduction

Common buzzards are a diurnal bird of prey belonging to the Falconiformes kind to the Accipitridae family and at Buteo buteo species. It is European bird with a length between 50 and 60 cm and with wing span between 125 and 145 cm which makes it a prey of mean size. The female is greater than the male. Common buzzards live in the woods but usually catch in open territories. It catches little mammalian, rodents, rabbits, coleopteras, lizards, snakes, and little birds which are also considered “biological indicators” of heavy metals absorbed by ground or deposited by air; moreover, it has a primary role in the preservation of equilibrium of the natural ecosystem eating also the carrions [1].

Biomonitors such as plants and soil organisms are better for monitoring the uptake of environmental contaminants into the food web or pyramid of terrestrial ecosystems [2]. Top predators can yield information over a large area around each sample site, not only regarding biovailability, but also about how, where, and when ecocontaminants are transferred within the food web. For ethical and legal reasons, however, top predators cannot be killed in quantities sufficient for biomonitoring. The use of sentinel species can provide interesting data to monitor the quality of the environment. Some species have biological habits that increase the likelihood of exposure to contaminants and can produce relevant information that would be missed if only water or soil were analyzed.

Heavy metals are ubiquitous elements present in nature and they must be considered important toxic contaminants because human activities have brought about a significant increase of their presence in the environment. They can easily enter the food chain and so cause possible toxic effects on humans and animals.

Several studies concerning the environmental impact of heavy metals (Hg, Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, Mn, and Fe) were made in organs and tissues (kidney, liver, muscle, feathers, skin, etc.) of various species of birds from Lombardia (north of Italy), from Marche and Umbria (centre of Italy), and from Campania (south of Italy). These data showed levels of Cd and Pb higher than our results in almost all samples analyzed [38].

The impact of heavy metals on the environment can be a serious threat for the stability of ecosystem [9, 10]. In particular, lead and cadmium are potentially toxic and pose a serial risk for human health when enter the food chain [11, 12]. The use of lead shot, indeed, increases anthropogenic input of this metal into the environment and causes a very specific pollution problem, resulting in considerable avian mortality. Primary lead toxicosis is prevalent among water birds which ingest lead shot by mistaking it for grit or seeds [1].

Cadmium has been described as one of the most dangerous trace elements in food and in the environment, not only for its high toxicity but also for its persistence. Atmospheric cadmium deposited on the earth’s crust can be absorbed or retained by soil particles and become part of biological structures.

Regarding copper, manganese and zinc are essential metals for human and animals, since they are involved in many physiological processes and are important micronutrients in human diet. Particularly, manganese plays an important role in the metabolism of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and in the production of steroids sexual hormones; moreover, it is the cofactor of enzymes such as RNA synthetase, glutamine synthetase, pyruvate decarboxylase, Mn-superoxido dismutase, and arginase [13].

At present, there are no data concerning the concentrations of heavy metals from the area of Sicily. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the concentrations of heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Mn, and Zn) in different organs (liver, kidney, muscle, lung, skin, and feathers) of buzzards (Buteo buteo), utilized as a “biological indicator” for environmental contamination, from different areas of Sicily and to investigate the relationships between birds sex, age and weight, and metal levels in these samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

During the period of April and December 2006 11 common buzzards (Buteo buteo) were collected from different areas of Sicily. Almost all little owls were taken during the summer, whereas the majority of the buzzards were gathered during winter. All the raptors came from Center of Recupero Fauna Selvatica of Palermo. The birds had been brought to the Center alive but injured or debilitated for various reasons. The main cause of death was determined by examining the birds macroscopically and, when necessary, radiological, histological, or toxicological analysis was done [2]. These different causes of death were classified as different kinds of trauma. Frequently the birds were injured by collision with a vehicle or with power lines or by lead shot. In general, the main causes of admission in the Centro were fractures and luxations due to traumas. In the postmortem examination, sex, age, and weight were determined (Table 1). The following data were gathered for each bird: sex, age, weight, cause of death, area of origin, data of arrival, and data of death. The 11 (6 females and 5 males) common buzzards comprised 5 juveniles and 6 adults (Table 1). The following samples were taken from each corpse: liver, kidneys, pectoral muscle, lungs, and skin. The preparation of samples was carried out taking care to avoid contamination and losses as much as possible: sterile scalpels and surgical tools cleaned or substituted for each bird were used together with rubber latex gloves. The working surface was also cleaned after each operation. The samples were handled in away to avoid any contact with external surfaces, placed individually in plastic bags, and stored at °C until analysis.


SamplesSexAgeWeight (g)

1Mjuveniles715
2Fadult830
3Fadult745
4Mjuveniles525
5Fadult720
6Fjuveniles600
7Madult830
8Mjuveniles750
9Madult620
10Fadult800
11Fjuveniles550

2.2. Instrument

Analyses were carried out on a PSA ION 3 potentiometric stripping analyzer (Steroglass, S. Martino in Campo, Perugia, Italy), which was controlled by NEOTES 2.0.1 software (Steroglass) run on an IBM-compatible personal computer. The instrument was equipped with a conventional three-electrode cell and was used for the analysis of Cd(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) in common buzzards samples. The working electrode was a glassy carbon electrode coated with a thin mercury film; the reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode (3 M KCl), and a platinum wire auxiliary electrode was used.

2.3. Reagents

Ultra pure hydrochloric acid (34%–37%), Hg (II) (1000 mgKg−1, 1 M in hydrochloric acid) and Cd(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), Pb(II), Zn(II) (1000 mgKg−1 0.5 N in HNO3) standard solutions were purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). Ultra pure H2O2 35%, used in the extraction procedure, was purchased from Carlo Erba Reagenti (Milan, Italy). Methanol was obtained by Carlo Erba Reagenti (Milan, Italy). The 0.5 M ammonia buffer (pH 9.5) was purchased from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). Ultra pure water (18.2 M  cm−1) was obtained by Carlo Erba Reagenti (Milan, Italy). The accuracy of the stripping potentiometer and the reliability of the methods described were tested with reference matrices of pork liver (NRMGBW08551) (LGC Promochem Milan, Italy).

2.4. Sample Preparation

All glassware was cleaned prior to use by soaking in 10% v/v for 12 hours and rinsed with ultra-pure water. Birds samples were dried in a 100°C oven. An exactly weighing aliquot of each sample was separately placed into teflon beakers and digested with 10.0 mL 35% at 45°C for 1 hour. The digested samples were dissolved in 10.0 mL of 37% HCl at 70°C for about 1 hour under magnetic stirring in order to ensure that all metals present remain in unbound-free forms. The dissolved sample was filtered through an acid precleaned 0.45  m membrane and then it was filtered on a carbon column previously activated by 2.0 mL of methanol followed by 2.0 mL of ultra-pure water to remove any residue of organic matter. The filtrates appeared colorless. Derivative stripping potentiometry allowed the direct determination of Cd(II), Cu(II), Mn(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II).

2.5. Mercury Film Formation (Plating)

Prior to each new experiment, a fresh mercury film was plated onto the glassy carbon surface of the working electrode by electrolyzing 20 mL of a 1000 mg Hg(II) Kg−1 standard solution at  mV for 1 minute. After each analysis, the used mercury film was removed by wiping the electrode surface with filter paper. The electrodes were stored in ultra-pure water.

2.6. Derivative Potentiometric Stripping Analysis (dPSA)

Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) can be simultaneously determined in common buzzard tissues, by placing into the electrochemical cell 2.0 mL of sample, 10.0 mL of ultrapure water, 1.0 mL of 1000 mg Hg (II) Kg−1 standard solution as the oxidant agent [14]. The pH of the sample was in the range of 1.8–2.0. The stirred electrolysis was executed at  mV for 120 seconds, then the potential was scanned towards less negative values (until 0 mV) at a scan rate of 10 mV/s; the Zn(II), Cd(II), Pb(II), and Cu(II) stripping peaks were respectively registered at  mV,  mV,  mV, and  mV. The quantitative analysis was executed by the multiple point standard additions method by adding twice 0.2 mL of 5.0 mgKg−1 Zn(II) and Cu(II) standard solutions, and 0.2 mL of 1.0 mgKg−1 Cd(II) and Pb(II) standard solutions. The analysis lasted 40 minutes. For Mn analysis, after the plating of the working electrode with mercury, 10.0  L of sample extract were put into the electrochemical cell together with 0.20 mL of 0.5 M ammonia-ammonium chloride buffer (pH 9.5), 19.0 mL of ultra-pure water, 0.1mL of Hg(II) 1000 mgKg−1, and deoxygenated for 5 minutes by N2 purging. The best electrochemical conditions were optimized by fixing the final acquisition potential and the cleaning potential, respectively at  mV and  mV, and fixing the deposition time at  s; the solution was stirred at 1000 rpm. The manganese stripping peak was registered around  mV. The quantitative analysis was done by the multiple-point standard additions method. Optimum precision and accuracy were obtained with the addition of two 0.05 mL aliquots of a standard solution of Mn (II) and performing the measurements five times. In the optimized electrochemical conditions, the manganese analysis lasted about 30 minutes.

3. Results

3.1. Method Performances

The extraction method repeatability was calculated by extracting each matrices three times and determining each metal four times in the same extract: the repeatability is represented by the mean r.s.d.% ( ) of all the measurements and ranged from 0.70 to 4.20 rsd% (Table 2). The limit of detection (LOD) of all the studied metals was evaluated using the expression 3  / [15]: indicated the standard deviation of the response (set at 200 ms/V) and the sensitivity expressed as the slope of the calibration curves of each analyte. Table 2 shows the obtained LOD ranged between 0.30 and 2.81  gKg−1. Carrying out the potentiometric determination of Cu(II), Pb(II), Cd(II), Mn(II), and Zn(II), a good linearity was obtained in the range of concentrations 0.0003–6.0 mgKg−1 ( ). To test the accuracy of the stripping potentiometer and the reliability of the methods described, recoveries from reference matrices of pork liver, subjected to the extraction procedure already described, were carried out (Table 2). The obtained results ranged from 92.5% to 98.9% (Table 2).


LiverKidneyMuscleLungsSkin

Cd(II) 1.304.012.303.604.20
0.500.401.000.720.30
94.493.895.196.494.0

Cu(II) 4.103.702.501.103.90
2.000.712.811.301.20
95.097.293.097.498.8

Pb (II) 1.702.820.903.022.80
2.000.712.301.180.40
92.596.698.095.298.4

Mn(II) 2.910.701.800.802.30
2.702.511.901.602.30
97.597.193.995.797.3

Zn(II) 4.101.012.722.601.61
2.801.701.502.902.02
95.298.098.993.097.7

3.2. Analytical Application

Concentrations ( ), range, and mean of each heavy metals found in eleven samples (liver, kidney, muscle, lung, and skin, resp.) of common buzzards (Buteo buteo) from different areas of Sicily were reported in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.


LiverCd(II)Pb(II)Cu(II)Mn(II)Zn(II)




KidneyCd(II)Pb(II)Cu(II)Mn(II)Zn(II)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11



MuscleCd(II)Pb(II)Cu(II)Mn(II)Zn(II)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11



LungsCd(II)Pb(II)Cu(II)Mn(II)Zn(II)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11



SkinCd(II)Pb(II)Cu(II)Mn(II)Zn(II)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8