Table of Contents
International Journal of Family Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 649253, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/649253
Research Article

Clinical Utility of Cognistat in Multiprofessional Team Evaluations of Patients with Cognitive Impairment in Swedish Primary Care

1Department of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
2Primary Health Care and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden

Received 21 October 2013; Revised 8 January 2014; Accepted 12 February 2014; Published 23 March 2014

Academic Editor: Samuel Y. S. Wong

Copyright © 2014 Maria M. Johansson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Löppönen, I. Räiha, R. Isoaho, T. Vahlberg, and S. Kivelä, “Diagnosing cognitive impairment and dementia in primary health care-a more active approach is needed,” Age and Ageing, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 606–612, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Ólafsdóttir, M. Foldevi, and J. Marcusson, “Dementia in primary care: why the low detection rate?” Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 194–198, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Clionsky and E. Clionsky, “Identifying cognitive impairment during the annual wellness visit: who can you trust?” Journal of Family Practice, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 653–659, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Nakata, M. Kasai, M. Kasuya et al., “Combined memory and executive function tests can screen mild cognitive impairment and converters to dementia in a community: the Osaki-Tajiri project,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Folstein, S. Folstein, and P. Mchugh, “Mini Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. J. Mitchell, “A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 411–431, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. M. Crum, J. C. Anthony, S. S. Bassett, and M. F. Folstein, “Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental state examination by age and educational level,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 269, no. 18, pp. 2386–2391, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. Starr and J. Lonie, “The influence of pre-morbid IQ on Mini-Mental state examination score at time of dementia presentation,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 382–384, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Scazufca, O. P. Almeida, H. P. Vallada, W. A. Tasse, and P. R. Menezes, “Limitations of the Mini-mental state examination for screening dementia in a community with low socioeconomic status,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 259, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Socialstyrelsen, Nationella riktlinjer för vård och omsorg vid demenssjukdom 2010 [National Guidelines for Care in Cases of Dementia In 2010. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm, 2010] (in Swedish).
  11. G. Caneman, Cognistat Manual- NKSU, 2001.
  12. R. J. Kiernan, J. Mueller, J. W. Langston, and C. Van Dyke, “The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: a brief but differentiated approach to cognitive assessment,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 481–485, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Johansson and E. Wressle, “Validation of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination and the rivermead behavioural memory test in investigations of dementia,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 282–287, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. A. Kukull, E. B. Larson, L. Teri, J. Bowen, W. McCormick, and M. L. Pfanschmidt, “The mini-mental state examination score and the clinical diagnosis of dementia,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1061–1067, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. G. Van Gorp, T. D. Marcotte, D. Sultzer, C. Hinkin, M. Mahler, and J. L. Cummings, “Screening for dementia: comparison of three commonly used instruments,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. I. Shulman, “Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 548–561, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. P. Nielsen, E. H. Wiig, S. Warkentin, and L. Minthon, “Clinical utility of color-form naming in Alzheimer's disease: preliminary evidence,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 1201–1204, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. S. Kvitting, A. Wiimo, M. M. Johansson et al., “A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT): usefulness in dementia evaluations in primary care,” Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. W. Rosen, R. Mohs, and K. Davis, “A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 1356–1364, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Babcock and L. Levy, Eds., The Measurement of Efficiency of Mental Functioning (Revised Examination): Test and Manual of Directions, Stoelting, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1940.
  21. D. C. Delis, E. Kaplan, and J. H. Kramer, Eds., Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (Swedish Manual Supplementary), Harcourt Assessment, Manila, Philippines, 2001.
  22. D. Wechsler, WAIS-III Swedish Manual, Harcourt Assessment, Manila, Philippines, 2003.
  23. R. M. Reitan, “Validity of the trail making test as an inidicator of organic brain damage,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. WHO, The ICD-10 International Classification, 2007, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  25. G. McKhann, D. Drachman, and M. Folstein, “Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 939–944, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. C. Roman, T. K. Tatemichi, T. Erkinjuntti et al., “Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies: report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop,” Neurology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 250–260, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. G. McKeith, D. W. Dickson, J. Lowe et al., “Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium,” Neurology, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1863–1872, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Dubois, D. Burn, C. Goetz et al., “Diagnostic procedures for Parkinson's disease dementia: recommendations from the movement disorder society task force,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 2314–2324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Winblad, K. Palmer, M. Kivipelto et al., “Mild cognitive impairment-beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 256, no. 3, pp. 240–246, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. American Psychiatric Association, Ed., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Foruth Edition (DSM-IV), American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  31. A. J. Mitchell, “Sensitivity x PPV is a recognized test called the clinical utility index (CUI+),” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 251–252, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. J. Youden, “Index for rating diagnostic tests,” Cancer, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 1950. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Lamarre and S. Patten, “A clinical evaluation of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination in a general psychiatric inpatient population,” Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Fields, G. Fulop, C. Sachs, J. Strain, and H. Fillit, “Usefulness of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination in the hospitalized elderly,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Tabert, J. Manly, X. Liu et al., “Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 916–924, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Nordlund, L. Påhlsson, C. Holmberg, K. Lind, and A. Wallin, “The Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB): a rapid test of cognitive domains,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1144–1151, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Smith, N. Gildeh, and C. Holmes, “The Montreal cognitive assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 329–332, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus