Table of Contents
International Journal of Family Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5767065, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5767065
Review Article

“Negotiorum Gestio” in Family Medicine, Informed Consent Obtainment, and Disciplinary Responsibility

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark

Received 30 October 2015; Accepted 10 March 2016

Academic Editor: Hakan Yaman

Copyright © 2016 Søren Birkeland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Stauch, The Law of Medical Negligence in England and Germany: A Comparative Analysis, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008.
  2. H. Aasen, Pasientens rett til selvbestemmelse ved medisinsk behandling [Doctoral thesis], Bergen, Oslo, Norway, 2000.
  3. Beauchamp and Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford Uiversity Press, Oxford, UK, 7th edition, 2012.
  4. A. Grubb, J. Laing, and J. McHale, Principles of Medical Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 3rd edition, 2010.
  5. D. L. Pearmain, A Critical Analysis of The Law on Health Service Delivery in South Africa, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2012.
  6. M. J. Barry, The President's Corner: July/August 2015, Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, 2015.
  7. J. Wrede-Sach, I. Voigt, H. Diederichs-Egidi, E. Hummers-Pradier, M. Dierks, and U. Junius-Walker, “Decision-making of older patients in context of the doctor-patient relationship: a typology ranging from “self-determined” to “doctor-trusting” patients,” International Journal of Family Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 478498, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Rosenbaum, “The paternalism preference—choosing unshared decision making,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 7, pp. 589–592, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. J. Barry, F. J. Fowler, A. G. Mulley, J. V. Henderson, and J. E. Wennberg, “Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia,” Medical Care, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 771–782, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Charles, A. Gafni, and T. Whelan, “Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango),” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 681–692, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. S. King and B. W. Moulton, “Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making,” American Journal of Law & Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 429–501, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Stacey, F. Legare, N. F. Col et al., “Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 10, Article ID Cd001431, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Birkeland, “Informed consent obtainment, malpractice litigation, and the potential role of shared decision making approaches,” in Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the European Association of Health Law (EAHL '15), EAHL, Ed., Prague, Czech Republic, October 2015.
  14. M. A. Durand, B. Moulton, E. Cockle, M. Mann, and G. Elwyn, “Can shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 15, no. 1, article 167, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Birkeland, “Shared decision making in interventional radiology,” Radiology, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 302–303, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. “ICPHC: declaration of Alma-Ata,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, USSR, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, September 1978.