Research Article

Impacts of Québec Primary Healthcare Reforms on Patients’ Experience of Care, Unmet Needs, and Use of Services

Table 2

Difference-in-differences (DD) of experience of care, unmet needs, and utilization of services (%) between users having NC, FMG, or FMG-NC as usual source of care and those having another type of medical clinic, 2003–2005 and 2008–2010.

2003–20052008–2010DD% of change
Comparison groupTreatment groupDiff.Comparison groupTreatment groupDiff.
(other medical clinics)(FMG-NC, FMG, NC)(other medical clinics)(FMG-NC, FMG, NC)
()()()()

Accessibility of services (max score: 10)7.207.250.05.2526.756.980.23<.0010.182.5.003
Continuity (max score: 10)8.168.00−0.16.0028.658.33−0.32<.001−0.16−2.0.107
Comprehensiveness (max score: 10)8.518.43−0.08.1068.428.27−0.15.002−0.07−0.8.343
Responsiveness (max score: 10)8.718.62−0.09.0048.868.860.00.0310.091.0.031
Perceived care outcomes (max score: 10)8.588.50−0.08.1058.758.57−0.18<.001−0.10−1.2.147
% of users who reported unmet needs for care19.118.8−0.30.77716.116.40.30.6910.63.2.632
% of users who attended usual source of care six times or more22.824.21.4<.00119.919.3−0.6.607−2.0−8.5.200
% of users who attended emergency room at least once34.736.72.0.10135.236.21.0.396−1.0−2.8.545
% of users hospitalized at least once16.116.50.4.68117.819.82.0.1051.69.8.413