Table of Contents
International Journal of Molecular Imaging
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 189830, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/189830
Research Article

Parametric Images in Assessing Bone Grafts Using Dynamic 18F-Fluoride PET

1Department of PET and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
2School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
3Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
4Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai 200030, China
5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
6Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Received 30 December 2010; Accepted 15 March 2011

Academic Editor: Hongming Zhuang

Copyright © 2011 Lingfeng Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Hawkins, Y. Choi, S. C. Huang et al., “Evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of fluorine-18-fluoride ion with PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 633–642, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Schiepers, J. Nuyts, G. Bormans et al., “Fluoride kinetics of the axial skeleton measured in vivo with fluorine-18-fluoride PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1970–1976, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. J. R. Cook, M. A. Lodge, P. K. Marsden, A. Dynes, and I. Fogelman, “Non-invasive assessment of skeletal kinetics using fluorine-18 fluoride positron emission tomography: evaluation of image and population-derived arterial input functions,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1424–1429, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. J. R. Cook, M. A. Lodge, G. M. Blake, P. K. Marsden, and I. Fogelman, “Differences in skeletal kinetics between vertebral and humeral bone measured by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography in postmenopausal women,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 763–769, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. L. Frost, G. M. Blake, S. J. Park-Holohan et al., “Long-term precision of 18F-fluoride PET skeletal kinetic studies in the assessment of bone metabolism,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 700–707, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Installé, A. Nzeusseu, A. Bol, G. Depresseux, J. P. Devogelaer, and M. Lonneux, “18F-fluoride PET for monitoring therapeutic response in Paget's disease of bone,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1650–1658, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Feng, L. Wen, and S. Eberl, “Techniques for parametric imaging,” in Biomedical Information Technology, D. Feng, Ed., pp. 137–163, Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. C. Huang, M. E. Phelps, E. J. Hoffman, K. Sideris, C. J. Selin, and D. E. Kuhl, “Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. E69–E82, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. S. Patlak and R. G. Blasberg, “Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 584–590, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Logan, N. D. Volkow, J. S. Fowler et al., “Effects of blood flow on [11C]raclopride binding in the brain: model simulations and kinetic analysis of PET data,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 995–1010, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Sörensen, G. Ullmark, B. Långström, and O. Nilsson, “Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morselized allografts: positron emission tomography (PET) studies on allografts in 5 femoral component revisions of total hip arthroplasty,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 633–643, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Brenner, C. Vernon, M. Muzi et al., “Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1493–1500, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Piert, E. Winter, G. A. Becker et al., “Allogenic bone graft viability after hip revision arthroplasty assessed by dynamic [18F]fluoride ion positron emission tomography,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 615–624, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Berding, W. Burchert, J. van den Hoff et al., “Evaluation of the incorporation of bone grafts used in maxillofacial surgery with [18F]fluoride ion and dynamic positron emission tomography,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1133–1140, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. Brenner, C. Vernon, E. U. Conrad, and J. F. Eary, “Assessment of the metabolic activity of bone grafts with 18F-fluoride PET,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1291–1298, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. P. P. Temmerman, P. G. H. M. Raijmakers, I. C. Heyligers et al., “Bone metabolism after total hip revision surgery with impacted grafting: evaluation using H215O and [18F] fluoride PET; a pilot study,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 288–293, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. K. Hooper, S. R. Meikle, S. Eberl, and M. J. Fulham, “Validation of postinjection transmission measurements for attenuation correction in neurological FDG-PET studies,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 128–136, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Ohtake, N. Kosaka, T. Watanabe et al., “Noninvasive method to obtain input function for measuring tissue glucose utilization of thoracic and abdominal organs,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1432–1438, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Even-Sapir, E. Mishani, G. Flusser, and U. Metser, “18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 462–469, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. D. Grant, F. H. Fahey, A. B. Packard, R. T. Davis, A. Alavi, and S. T. Treves, “Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus