Research Article  Open Access
Jacob Carl Coetzee, "DualFrequency Decoupling Networks for Compact Antenna Arrays", International Journal of Microwave Science and Technology, vol. 2011, Article ID 249647, 3 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/249647
DualFrequency Decoupling Networks for Compact Antenna Arrays
Abstract
Decoupling networks can alleviate the effects of mutual coupling in antenna arrays. Conventional decoupling networks can provide decoupled and matched ports at a single frequency. This paper describes dualfrequency decoupling which is achieved by using a network of series or parallel resonant circuits instead of single reactive elements.
1. Introduction
The adverse effects of mutual coupling on the performance of multiport antennas are well known [1]. The effects can be countered by using a decoupling network which provides an additional signal path to effectively cancel the external coupling between array elements to yield decoupled ports [2–4].
In its simplest form, the decoupling network consists of reactive elements connected between neighbouring array elements, but this approach only applies when the mutual admittances between elements are all purely imaginary [2]. The design of decoupling networks for arrays with arbitrary complex mutual admittances has been described [3–5]. In [6], closedform design equations for the decoupling network elements of symmetrical 2element and 3element arrays were presented. This concept was extended to the decoupling of larger, circulant symmetric arrays through repeated decoupling of the eigenmodes [7]. However, these methods are only applicable to the decoupling of arrays over a small bandwidth at a single frequency. This paper describes dualfrequency decoupling of arrays. The procedure is based on the methods described in [6, 7], but where each reactive element in the singlefrequency decoupling network is replaced with either a series or parallel combination of an inductor and a capacitor in order to achieve simultaneous decoupling and matching at two frequencies.
2. Theory
The procedures described in [6] or [7] may be employed to design a network at two distinct frequencies, and . Subsequently, the relations provided in [8] can be used to design Lsection impedance matching networks which match the decoupled port impedances to the system impedance at and . Refer, for example, to the decoupling and matching networks for a 2element array, shown in Figure 1. and are the elements of the decoupling network at frequency , while and are the corresponding values at frequency . The element values are obtained in closed form from [6]. Ports 1′ and 2′ will thus be decoupled at both frequencies, but the port impedances and are not matched to . The matching networks shown in Figure 1 are for the case where and . and and are the matching network elements at frequency , whereas and are the elements at frequency .
In order to realise the required values of the elements of the decoupling and matching networks, each reactive element in Figure 1 can be replaced with a circuit consisting of either a series or a parallel combination of a capacitor and an inductor. The component values of the capacitors and inductors can be computed using the relations provided in Table 1. The chosen topology in Figure 2 sees the series and parallel elements in Figure 1 replaced by series and parallel LC circuits, respectively. Note that the design equations in [6–8] provide several possible solutions for the element values of the decoupling and matching networks in Figure 1. A number of these options would result in nonphysical, negative values for the capacitors and inductors in Figure 2. Care should therefore be taken to only select those options which yield positive values for each capacitor and inductor in the implementation.

3. Example
To verify the theory, dualfrequency decoupling and matching networks were designed for the same 2element monopole array used in [6]. The array elements were wires measuring in length and in diameter at 2.5 GHz, and an element spacing of was used. A system impedance of was assumed. This array was decoupled and matched at frequencies GHz and GHz. The scattering parameters, decoupling and matching network elements, and the components of the implementation are shown in Table 2. The calculated scattering parameters of the decoupled array are shown together with those of the original array in Figure 3. The results clearly illustrate the validity of the theory, since the array is both decoupled and matched at and .

It should be noted that the decoupling/matching circuit is sensitive to capacitor and inductor tolerances. The decoupled 2element monopole array was analysed repeatedly with element values varying randomly within a tolerance of ±1% and ±5%. The results are shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Although some frequency shifting is apparent in Figure 4, the performance of the system is still adequate. However, in the case of the ±5% element tolerance in Figure 5, the overall performance has deteriorated beyond acceptable standards. Element tolerances will therefore be an important consideration in the practical implementation of such circuits.
4. Conclusion
Dualfrequency decoupling of tightly coupled arrays was described. The approach involves the design of decoupling and matching networks at two distinct frequencies and implementing them simultaneously using a ladder network of parallel or series LC circuits. The approach was illustrated for a 2element array, but is equally applicable to larger arrays. Singlefrequency decoupling networks are usually characterised by narrow bandwidths. By selecting the two frequencies of a dualfrequency decoupling network close to the desired operating frequency, the bandwidth for a singlefrequency application can possibly also be improved.
References
 A. C. Ludwig, “Mutual coupling, gain and directivity of an array of two identical antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 837–841, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
 H. J. Chaloupka, X. Wang, and J. C. Coetzee, “A superdirective 3element array for adaptive beamforming,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 425–430, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. T. Chua and J. C. Coetzee, “Microstrip decoupling networks for loworder multiport arrays with reduced element spacing,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 592–597, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Weber, C. Volmer, K. Blau, R. Stephan, and M. A. Hein, “Miniaturized antenna arrays using decoupling networks with realistic elements,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2733–2740, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Chen, Y. S. Wang, and S. J. Chung, “A decoupling technique for increasing the port isolation between two strongly coupled antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3650–3658, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. C. Coetzee and Y. Yu, “Closedform design equations for decoupling networks of small arrays,” Electronics Letters, vol. 44, no. 25, pp. 1441–1442, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. C. Coetzee and Y. Yu, “Design of decoupling networks for circulant symmetric antenna arrays,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 291–294, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005.
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Jacob Carl Coetzee. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.