Performance of Deconvolution Methods in Estimating CBOC-Modulated Signals

<table>LOS carrier phase (a), code delay (b), and amplitude (c) versus <svg height="14.75" id="M178" style="vertical-align:-3.25793pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 34.349998 14.75" width="34.349998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,14.75)">
<g transform="translate(72,-60.2)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝐶</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="8.389513" y="0">/</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="11.865347" y="0">𝑁</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-49.44,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">0</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> for 2-path static channel and CBOC signal.</table>

International Journal of Navigation and Observation

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Performance of Deconvolution Methods in Estimating CBOC-Modulated Signals 