Table of Contents
International Journal of Oceanography
Volume 2014, Article ID 284979, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/284979
Research Article

Ecology of Interstitial Faunal Assemblage from the Beaches along the Coast of Kerala, India

1Department of Zoology, Bharata Mata College, Thrikkakara, Kochi-682021, Kerala, India
2School of Marine Science, CUSAT, Kochi-682016, Kerala, India
3Nansen Environment Research Centre, Kochi-682016, Kerala, India

Received 11 August 2013; Accepted 25 November 2013; Published 23 January 2014

Academic Editor: Swadhin Behera

Copyright © 2014 Geetha Priyalakshmi and N. R. Menon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Kaladharan, D. Prema, A. Nandakumar, and K. K. Valsala, “Occurrence of tarball and waste materials on the beaches along Kerala coast in India,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Elaine Albuquerque, A. P. B. Pinto, A. Perez, and V. G. Veloso, “Spatial and temporal changes in interstitial meiofauna on a sandy ocean beach of South America,” Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, vol. 55, no. 2, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Baba, “Wave characteristics and beach processes of the south-west coast of India—a summary,” in Ocean Waves and Beach Processes, M. Baba and N. P. Kurien, Eds., pp. 225–238, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Creer, V. G. Fonseca, D. L. Porazinska et al., “Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 19, supplement 1, pp. 4–20, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. K. de Oliveira Pinto and P. J. Parreira Dos Santos, “Meiofauna community structure variability in a Brazilian tropical sandy beach,” Atlantica, Rio Grande, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. H.-U. Dahms, S. Chullasorn, N. V. Schizas, P. Kangtia, W. Anansatitporn, and W.-X. Yang, “Naupliar development among the tisbidae (Copepoda: Harpacticidae) with a phylogenetic analysis and naupliar description of Tisbe thailandensis from Thailand,” Zoological Studies, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 780–796, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Yamanaka, D. Raffaelli, and P. C. L. White, “Physical determinants of intertidal communities on dissipative beaches: implications of sea-level rise,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. G. Rodríguez, M. Lastra, and J. López, “Meiofauna distribution along a gradient of sandy beaches in northern Spain,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 58, pp. 63–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. Giere, “Synecological perspectives in meiobenthology,” in Meiobenthology: the Microscopic Motile Fauna of Aquatic Sediments, vol. 2nd, pp. 406–416, Springer, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. G. Govindankutty and N. B. Nair, “Preliminary observations on the interstitial fauna of the south-west coast of India,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. C. Rajan, Studies on the interstitial fauna of the southwest coast of India [Ph.D. thesis], University of Kerala, 1972.
  12. R. Damodaran, “Studies on the benthos of the mud banks of the Kerala coast,” Bulletin of the Department of Marine Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 1–126, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. K. Abdul Aziz and N. B. Nair, “Meiofauna of the Edavana—Nadayara Paravur backwater system south west coast of India,” Mahasagar Bulletin of the National Institute of Oceanography, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. S. Ingole, Z. A. Ansari, and A. H. Parulekar, “Benthic fauna around Mauritius Island, southwest Indian Ocean,” Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 268–273, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. A. Ansari and A. H. Parulekar, “Distribution, abundance and ecology of the meiofauna in a tropical estuary along the west coast of India,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Sajan, T. V. Joydas, and R. Damodaran, “Meiofauna of the western continental shelf of India, Arabian Sea,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 665–674, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. J. Rundell and B. S. Leander, “Masters of miniaturization: convergent evolution among interstitial eukaryotes,” BioEssays, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 430–437, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. O. Pfannkuche and H. Thiel, “Sample processing,” in Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna, R. P. Higgins and H. Thiel, Eds., pp. 134–145, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  19. W. Wieser, “Benthic studies in buzzards bay. II, The meiofauna,” Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 5, pp. 121–137, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Neira and M. Rackemann, “Black spots produced by buried macroalgae in intertidal sandy sediments of the Wadden sea: effects on the meiobenthos,” Journal of Sea Research, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 153–170, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. D. H. Wiseman and H. E. Bennette, “Distribution of organic matter and nitrogen in the sediments from the Arabian Sea,” John Murray Expedition, vol. 3, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Barnes, Apparatus and Methods in Oceanography. Part I, George Allen & Unwin, London, UK, 1959.
  23. J. B. Buchanan, “Sediment Analysis,” in Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos, N. A. Holme and A. D. McIntyre, Eds., vol. 16 of IBP Handbook, pp. 41–65, Blackwell, Oxford, 2nd edition, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. L. Folk, Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks, Hemphil, Austin, Texas, USA, 1974.
  25. J. D. H. Strickland and T. R. Parsons, “A practical handbook of Seawater analysis,” in Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, vol. 167, pp. 1–310, 2nd edition, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. E. Shannon and W. Wiener, The Mathematical Theory of Communication. , Usbana, University of Illinoi Press, 1949.
  27. E. H. Simpson, “Measurement of diversity,” Nature, vol. 163, no. 4148, p. 688, 1949. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. C. Pielou, Ed., An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
  29. R. M. Warwick, “The nematode/copepod ratio and its use in pollution ecology,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 329–333, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Ganesh and A. V. Raman, “Macrobenthic community structure of the northeast Indian shelf, Bay of Bengal,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 341, pp. 59–73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. W. Nybakken, Marine Biology: an Ecological Approach, Addisoon-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA, 1996.
  32. P. J. Somerfield, H. L. Rees, and R. M. Warwick, “Interrelationships in community structure between shallow-water marine meiofauna and macrofauna in relation to dredgings disposal,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 127, no. 1–3, pp. 103–112, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. S. Meadows and J. G. Anderson, “Micro-organisms attached to marine and freshwater sand grains,” Nature, vol. 212, no. 5066, pp. 1059–1060, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. McIntyre and D. J. Murison, “The meiofauna of a flatfish nursery ground,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 53, pp. 93–118, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  35. B. O. Jansson and Quantitative a, “Experimental Studies of the Interstitial Fauna in Four Swedish Beaches,” Ophelia, vol. 5, pp. 1–72, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Trevallion, A. D. Ansell, P. Sivadas, and B. Narayanan, “A preliminary account of two sandy beaches in South West India,” Marine Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 268–279, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. S. Ingole and A. H. Parulekar, “Role of salinity in structuring the intertidal meiofauna of a tropical estuarine beach: field evidence,” Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3-4, pp. 356–361, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. N. Ganapati and G. C. Rao, “Ecology of the interstitial fauna inhabiting the sandy beaches of Waltair coast,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  39. V. M. A. P. Silva, P. A. Grohmann, and C. S. R. Nogueira, “Studies of meiofauna of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” Coastal Zone, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 2011–2022, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  40. C. A. I. Lizhe, F. U. Sujing, Y. Jie, and Z. X. Ping, “Distribution of meiofaunal abundance in relation to environmental factors in Beibu Gulf, South China,” Acta Oceanologica Sinica, vol. 31, pp. 92–103, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  41. G. Mantha, M. S. N. Moorthy, K. Altaff et al., “Seasonal shifts of meiofauna community structures on sandy beaches along the Chennai coast, India,” Crustaceana, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 27–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Moreno, T. J. Ferrero, V. Granelli, V. Marin, G. Albertelli, and M. Fabiano, “Across shore variability and trophodynamic features of meiofauna in a microtidal beach of the NW Mediterranean,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 357–367, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. G. Raffaelli and C. F. Mason, “Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 158–163, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. C. Coull, G. R. F. Hicks, and J. B. J. Wells, “Nematode/copepod ratios for monitoring pollution: a rebuttal,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 378–381, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. J. D. Lambshead, “The nematode/copepod ratio. Some anomalous results from the Firth of Clyde,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 256–259, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. Danovaro, M. Fabiano, and M. Vincx, “Meiofauna response to the Agip Abruzzo oil spill in subtidal sediments of the Ligurian Sea,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 133–145, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Amjad and J. S. Gray, “Use of the nematode-copepod ratio as an index of organic pollution,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 178–181, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. F. Sutherland, C. D. Levings, S. A. Petersen, P. Poon, and B. Piercey, “The use of meiofauna as an indicator of benthic organic enrichment associated with salmonid aquaculture,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1249–1261, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Moreno, L. Vezzulli, V. Marin, P. Laconi, G. Albertelli, and M. Fabiano, “The use of meiofauna diversity as an indicator of pollution in harbours,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1428–1435, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. P. Veiga, C. Besteiro, and M. Rubal, “Meiofauna communities in exposed sandy beaches on the Galician coast (NW Spain), six months after the Prestige oil spill: the role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),” Scientia Marina, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 385–394, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. J. Somerfield, H. L. Rees, and R. M. Warwick, “Interrelationships in community structure between shallow-water marine meiofauna and macrofauna in relation to dredgings disposal,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 127, no. 1–3, pp. 103–112, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. M. Shiells and K. J. Anderson, “Pollution monitoring using the nematode/copepod ratio. A practical application,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 62–68, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. R. Lee, J. A. Correa, and J. C. Castilla, “An assessment of the potential use of the Nematode to copepod ratio in the monitoring of metal pollution—the chanaral case,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 696–701, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  54. N. Smol, R. Huys, and M. Vincx, “A four year analyses of the meiofauna community of a dumping site for TiO2 waste off the Dutch coast,” Chemistry and Ecology, vol. 5, pp. 197–215, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  55. K. G. M. T. Ansari, P. S. Lyla, S. Ajmal Khan, S. Manokaran, and S. Raja, “Community structure of harpacticoid copepods from the south east continental shelf of India,” Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–100, 2013. View at Google Scholar