Table of Contents
International Journal of Oceanography
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 728753, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/728753
Research Article

Relating Ctenophore Population to Water Mass Indices in the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf Ecosystem

1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rhode Island College, 600 Mount Pleasant Avenue, Providence, RI 02908, USA
2NOAA Fisheries, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA

Received 7 October 2014; Revised 3 February 2015; Accepted 11 February 2015

Academic Editor: Renzo Perissinotto

Copyright © 2015 Rebecca Sparks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. A. Shiganova, Z. A. Mirzoyan, E. A. Studenikina et al., “Population development of the invader ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, in the Black Sea and in other seas of the Mediterranean basin,” Marine Biology, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 431–445, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. C. Gucu, “Can overfishing be responsible for the successful establishment of Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black Sea?” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 439–451, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Bilio and U. Niermann, “Is the comb jelly really to blame for it all? Mnemiopsis leidyi and the ecological concerns about the Caspian Sea,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 269, pp. 173–183, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. D. Brodeur, H. Sugisaki, and G. L. Hunt Jr., “Increases in jellyfish biomass in the Bering Sea: implications for the ecosystem,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 233, pp. 89–103, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. E. Purcell and M. N. Arai, “Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 451, pp. 27–44, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. S. Link and M. D. Ford, “Widespread and persistent increase of Ctenophora in the continental shelf ecosystem off NE USA,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 320, pp. 153–159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. D. Ford and J. S. Link, “Bounds on biomass estimates and energetic consequences of Ctenophora in the Northeast U.S. shelf ecosystem,” International Journal of Oceanography, vol. 2014, Article ID 851809, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Ecosystem Assessment Program, “Ecosystem status report for the northeast shelf large marine ecosystem—2014,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. T. Frank, “Ecological significance of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus off southwestern Nova Scotia,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 211–222, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. H. Fraser, “The ecology of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus in Scottish Waters,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 149–168, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. H. Greene and A. J. Pershing, “The response of Calanus finmarchicus populations to climate variability in the Northwest Atlantic: basin-scale forcing associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1536–1544, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. W. Jossi and J. R. Goulet Jr., “Zooplankton trends: US north-east shelf ecosystem and adjacent regions differ from north-east Atlantic and North Sea,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 303–313, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Hare and J. Kane, “Zooplankton of the Gulf of Maine: a changing perspecitve,” in Proceedings of the American Fisheries Society Symposium, vol. 79, pp. 115–137, 2012.
  14. Ecosystem Assessment Program, “Ecosystem status report for the Northeast Shelf Large Marine Ecosystem—2011,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 12-07, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Hirota, “Quantitative natural history of Pleurobrachia bachei in La Jolla Bight,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 295–334, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. Kremer and M. R. Reeve, “Growth dynamics of a ctenophore (Mnemiopsis) in relation to variable food supply. II. Carbon budgets and growth model,” Journal of Plankton Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 553–574, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. R. Reeve, M. A. Syms, and P. Kremer, “Growth dynamics of a ctenophore (Mnemiopsis) in relation to variable food supply. I. Carbon biomass, feeding, egg production, growth and assimilation efficiency,” Journal of Plankton Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 535–552, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Schmidt and H. Lipson, “Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data,” Science, vol. 324, no. 5923, pp. 81–85, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Wolfram, Mathematica (Version 9) [software], Wolfram, Champagne, Ill, USA, 2012, http://www.wolfram.com/.
  20. D. G. Mountain, “Labrador slope water entering the Gulf of Maine-response to the North Atlantic Oscillation,” Continental Shelf Research, vol. 47, pp. 150–155, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Zill, Differential Equations with Computer Lab Experiments, Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1998.
  22. M. Schmidt and H. Lipson, Eureqa (Version 0.98 Beta) [Software], Nutonian, Somerville, Mass, USA, 2013, http://www.nutonian.com.
  23. D. M. Hamby, “A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 135–154, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus