Table of Contents
International Journal of Population Research
Volume 2014, Article ID 671715, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/671715
Research Article

Assessing Net Coverage for Young Children in the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census

The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 4228 Red Bandana Way, Ellicott City, MD 21042, USA

Received 8 July 2014; Accepted 21 October 2014; Published 18 November 2014

Academic Editor: Kathryn Kost

Copyright © 2014 William P. O’Hare. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. P. O'Hare, The Overlooked Undercount: Children Missed in the Decennial Census, The Annie. E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1999.
  2. W. P. O'Hare, Why Are Young Children Missed So Often in the Census, KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2009.
  3. W. P. O'Hare, “The net undercount of children in the 2010 decennial census,” in Proceedings of the Applied Demography Conference, University of Texas, San Antonio, Tex, USA, January 2012.
  4. K. K. West and J. G. Robinson, “What do we know about the undercount or children?” Population Division Working Paper, U.S. Decennial Census Bureau, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Goodkind, “Child underreporting, fertility, and sex ratio imbalance in China,” Demography, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 291–316, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. A. Anderson and B. D. Silver, “Estimating census undercount from school enrollment data: an application to the Soviet censuses of 1959 and 1970,” Demography, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 289–308, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. A. Anderson, “Undercount in China's 2000 decennial census in comparative perspective,” PSC Research Report, No. 04-565, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. W. P. O'Hare, E. Jensen, and B. C. O'Hare, “Assessing the undercount of young children in the U.S. decennial census: implications for survey research and potential explanations,” in Proceedings of the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, Boston, Mass, USA, May 2013.
  9. V. Velkoff, “Demographic evaluation of the 2010 census,” in Proceedings of the PAA Annual Conference, Washington, DC, USA, March 2011.
  10. H. Hogan, P. J. Cantwell, J. Devine, V. T. Mule Jr., and V. Velkoff, “Quality and the 2010 Census,” Population Research and Policy Review, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 637–662, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. T. Mule, 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Estimates Report: Summary Estimates of Coverage of Persons in the United States,, DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series 2010-G-01, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  12. J. G. Robinson, “Coverage of population in decennial census 2000 based on demographic analysis: the history behind the numbers,” Working Paper No. 91, U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. L. Himes and C. C. Clogg, “An overview of demographic analysis as a method for evaluating census coverage in the United States,” Population index, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 587–607, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. U.S. Decennial Census Bureau, The Development and Sensitivity Analysis of the 2010 Demographic Analysis Estimates, Population Division, 2010.
  15. D. O. Price, “A check on the underenumeration in the 1940 census,” The American Sociological Review, vol. 12, pp. 44–49, 1947. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Coale, “The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex and color—a revision of decennial census figures,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 50, pp. 16–54, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. S. Siegel and M. Zelnik, “An evaluation of coverage in the 1960 decennial census of population by techniques of demographic analysis and by composite methods,” in Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, pp. 71–85, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, USA, 1966.
  18. A. J. Coale and M. Zelnick, New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1963.
  19. A. J. Coale and W. Rives, “A statistical reconstruction of Black population of the United States: 1880 to 1970: estimates of true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility,” Population Index, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 3–36, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. D. Hacker, “New estimates of census coverage in the United States, 1850–1930,” Social Science History, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 71–101, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. W. Adams and A. B. Kasakoff, “Estimates of decennial census underenumeration based on genealogies,” Social Science History, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 527–543, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  22. K. K. West, “Using medicare enrollment file for the DA 2010 estimates,” in Proceedings of the Applied Demography Conference, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex, USA, January 2010.
  23. J. G. Robinson, “Coverage of population in decennial census 2000 based on demographic analysis: the history behind the numbers,” Working Paper no. 91, U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Devine, L. Sink, B. DeSalvo, and R. Corte, “The use of vital statistics in the 2010 demographic analysis estimates,” Census Bureau Working Paper No. 88, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Bhaskar, M. Scopilliti, F. Hollman, and D. Armstrong, “Plans for producing estimates of net international migration for the 2010 demographic analysis estimates,” Census Bureau Working Paper 90, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Census Bureau, Release of Demographic Analysis, 2010.
  27. Demographic Analysis Research Team, “Estimates of net international migration in demographic analysis,” in Proceedings of the Demographic Analysis Conference, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA, December 2010.
  28. J. Schachter, “Estimating native emigration from the United States,” Memorandum, U.S. Census Bureau, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. Pitkin and J. Park, “The gap between births and decennial census counts of children born in California: undercount or transnational movement?” in Proceedings of the Population Association of America Conference, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, March 2005.
  30. “U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Demographic Analysis,” December 2010–May 2012.
  31. Y. Mayol-Garcia and J. G. Robinson, “Census 2010 counts compared to the 2010 population estimates by demographic characteristics,” in Proceedings of the Southern Demographic Association Conference, Tallahassee, Fla, USA, October 2011.
  32. J. G. Robinson, A. Bashir, and E. W. Fernandez, “Demographic analysis as an expanded program for early coverage evaluation of the 2000 census,” in Proceedings of the Census Bureau Annual Research Conference, Arlington, Va, USA, March 1993.
  33. A. L. Adlakha, J. G. Robinson, K. K. West, and A. Bruce, “Assessment of consistency of decennial census data with demographic benchmarks at the subnational level,” Decennial Census 2000 Evaluation 0.20 Final Report, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  34. J. G. Robinson, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Demographic Analysis Results, DSSD Decennial Census 2000 Procedures for operations Memorandum Series B-4, U.S. Decennial Census Bureau, 2000.
  35. R. Bhaskar, M. Scopilliti, F. Hollman, and D. Armstrong, “Estimates of net international migration for the 2010 demographic analysis estimates,” in Paper Prepared for U.S. Census Bureau Workshop: 2010 Demographic Analysis Technical Review, p. 1, Suitland Md, USA, January 2009.
  36. U. S. Census Bureau, Tables released at December 2010 Conference Table 8, 2010.
  37. U.S. Census Bureau, Technical Assessment of A.C.E. Revision II, U.S. Decennial Census Bureau, 2003.
  38. National Research Council, “The 2000 census: counting under adversity,” in Panel to Review the 2000 Census, C. F. Citro, D. L. Cork, and J. L. Norwood, Eds., p. 254, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education, The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  39. K. W. Wachter and D. A. Freedman, “The fifth cell: correlation bias in U.S. census adjustment,” Tech. Rep. no. 570, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  40. R. Shores, “Accuracy and coverage evaluation revision II adjustment for correlation bias,” DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series PP-53, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  41. W. P. O'Hare, J. G. Robinson, K. K. West, and V. T. Mule, “Comparing demographic analysis and dual-systems estimates results for children,” in Proceedings of the Southern Demographic Association Conference, Williamsburg, Va, USA, October 2012.
  42. J. G. Robinson, “Coverage of population in decennial census 2000 based on demographic analysis: the history behind the numbers,” Working Paper no. 91, US Census Bureau, The History Behind the Numbers, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  43. J. Devine, L. Sink, B. DeSalvo, and R. Cortes, “The use of vital statistics in the 2010 demographic analysis estimates,” Census Bureau Working Paper no., vol. 88, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  44. U.S. Office of Management and Budget, “Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity,” Statistical Policy Directive 15, Federal Register Notice, October 1997.
  45. J. A. Martin, B. E. Hamilton, and S. J. Ventura, Births: Final Data for 2009, National Vital Statistics System, vol. 60, no. 1, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md, USA, 2009.
  46. J. Ortman, F. W. Hollmann, and C. E. Guarneri, “Estimating multiple-race births for the 2010 demographic analysis estimates,” in Proceedings of the Applied Demography Conference, San Antonio, Tex, USA, January 2012.
  47. E. Aries, W. S. Schauman, K. Eschbach, P. D. Sorlie, and E. Backlund, “The Validity of race and Hispanic Origin reporting on death certificates in the United States,” National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics, vol. 2, no. 148, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  48. W. Wang, The Rise of Intermarriage, Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends, 2012.
  49. U. S. Census Bureau, Documentation for the Revised 2010 Demographic Analysis Middle Series Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  50. U.S. Census Bureau, Tables released at December 2010 Conference Table 8, December 2010.
  51. H. Hogan, “Comments in the undercount of young children,” in Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Montreal, Canada, 2013.
  52. D. J. Fein, The social sources of decennial census omission: racial and ethnic differences in omission rates in recent U.S. censuses [Dissertation], Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1989.
  53. M. Anderson, C. Citro, and J. Salvo, Eds., Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census: From the Constitution to the American Community Survey (ACS), Sage, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  54. U.S. Office of Management and Budget, “Guidance on aggregation and allocation of data on race for use in civil rights monitoring and enforcement,” May 2001.
  55. U.S. Census Bureau, Estimates of Coverage of Population by Sex, Race and Age: Demographic Analysis 1970, Decennial Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Program, 1974.
  56. R. E. Fay, J. S. Passel, J. G. Robinson, and C. D. Cowan, “The coverage of the population in the 1980 census,” Decennial Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Reports PHC80-E4, U.S. Decennial Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  57. J. G. Robinson and A. Adlaka, Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Results with Demographic Analysis, DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Estimates Memorandum Series #PP-41, US Bureau of the Census, 2002.
  58. G. Robinson and A. Adlaka, Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Results with Demographic Analysis, DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Estimates Memorandum Series #PP-41, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2002.
  59. R. M. Groves and M. P. Couper, Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  60. D. H. Griffin, Final Task Force Report: Task Force on the Undercount of Young Children, Memorandum for Frank A. Vitrano, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  61. E. Nichols, R. King, and J. Childs, “Small-Scale Testing Pilot Test Results: Testing email subject lines and address collection screens and Census opinion questions using a nonprobability panel,” Internal memorandum to Burton Reist. U.S. Census Bureau, 2014.
  62. L. Schwede and R. Terry, Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage Across Race and Ethnic Groups, Census Planning Memorandum Series, No. 255, U.S. Census Bureau, 2013.
  63. W. P. O'Hare, “Potential explanations for the high net undercount of young children in the U.S. census,” in Proceedings of the Applied Demography Conference, University of Texas, San Antonio, Tex, USA, January 2014.
  64. U.S. Census Bureau, “Population differential fertility: 1940 and 1910; standardized fertility rates and reproduction rates, appendix A,” in Completeness of Enumeration of Children under 5 Years Old in the Decennial Census of 1940 and 1910, 1940, p. 32, U.S. Decennial Census, Washington, DC, USA, 1944. View at Google Scholar