Table of Contents
International Journal of Vehicular Technology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 951762, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/951762
Research Article

Human’s Overtrust in and Overreliance on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: A Theoretical Framework

Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8573, Japan

Received 26 December 2012; Accepted 24 March 2013

Academic Editor: Klaus Bengler

Copyright © 2013 Toshiyuki Inagaki and Makoto Itoh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Inagaki, “Smart collaboration between humans and machines based on mutual understanding,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 253–261, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Hollnagel and A. Bye, “Principles for modelling function allocation,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 253–265, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Klein, “A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making,” in Decision Making in Action, G. Klein, J. Orasanu, and R. Calderwood, Eds., pp. 138–147, Ablex, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. E. Billings, Aviation Automation—The Search for a Human-Centered Approach, LEA, 1997.
  5. T. Inagaki, “Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation,” Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 161–167, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. R. Endsley and E. O. Kiris, “The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation,” Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 381–394, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. B. Sarter and D. D. Woods, “How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control,” Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, “Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse,” Human Factors, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 230–253, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. B. Sarter, D. D. Woods, and C. E. Billings, “Automation surprises,” in Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, G. Salvendy, Ed., pp. 1926–1943, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Inagaki and J. Stahre, “Human supervision and control in engineering and music: similarities, dissimilarities and their implications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 589–600, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Parasuraman, R. Molloy, and I. L. Singh, “Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency’,” International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. L. Mosier, L. J. Skitka, S. Heers, and M. Burdick, “Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits,” International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Meyer, “Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings,” Human Factors, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 563–572, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. B. Sheridan and R. Parasuraman, “Human-automation interaction,” in Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, R. S. Nickerson, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 89–129, HFES, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. Complacency, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, 2010.
  16. N. Moray and T. Inagaki, “Attention and complacency,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 354–365, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Lee and N. Moray, “Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems,” Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1243–1270, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Itoh, “Toward overtrust-free advanced driver assistance systems,” Cognition, Technology, and Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Inagaki, “New challenges on vehicle automation: human trust in and reliance on adaptive cruise control systems,” in Proceedings of the IEA (CD-ROM), p. 4, 2003.
  20. G. J. S. Wilde, Target Risk, PDE Publications, Toronto, Canada, 1994.
  21. OECD Road Transport Research, Behavioral Adaptations to Changes in the Road Transportation System, OECD, Paris, France, 1990.
  22. M. Weinberger, H. Winner, and H. Bubb, “Adaptive cruise control field operational test—the learning phase,” JSAE Review, vol. 22, pp. 487–494, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  23. B. D. Seppelt and J. D. Lee, “Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 192–205, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. A. Dickie and L. N. Boyle, “Drivers' understanding of adaptive cruise control limitations,” in Proceedings of the 53rd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (HFES '09), pp. 1806–1810, October 2009. View at Scopus
  25. K. Tanno, M. Kohno, K. Ono et al., “Fatal cardiovascular injuries to the unbelted occupant associated with airbag deployment: two case-reports,” Legal Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 227–231, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Itoh, Y. Fujiwara, and T. Inagaki, “Driver behavioural changes through interactions with an automatic brake systems,” Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 512–519, 2011 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Inagaki, “Adaptive automation: sharing and trading of control,” in Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, E. Hollnagel, Ed., pp. 147–169, LEA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. W. Scerbo, “Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation,” in Automation and Human Performance, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, Eds., pp. 37–63, LEA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  29. T. Inagaki and T. B. Sheridan, “Authority and responsibility in human-machine systems: probability theoretic validation of machine-initiated trading of authority,” Cognition, Technology & Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. T. Inagaki, M. Itoh, and Y. Nagai, “Efficacy and acceptance of driver support under possible mismatches between driver's intent and traffic conditions,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES '06), pp. 280–283, October 2006. View at Scopus
  31. T. Inagaki, M. Itoh, and Y. Nagai, “Driver support functions under resource-limited situations,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES '07), pp. 176–180, October 2007. View at Scopus
  32. T. Inagaki, M. Itoh, and Y. Nagai, “Support by warning or by action: which is appropriate under mismatches between driver intent and traffic conditions?” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, vol. E90-A, no. 11, pp. 2540–2545, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus