Table of Contents
International Journal of Vehicular Technology
Volume 2017, Article ID 4531780, 10 pages
Research Article

Integration of an Adaptive Infotainment System in a Vehicle and Validation in Real Driving Scenarios

1Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
2SEAT, S. A., Barcelona, Spain
3Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya and Fundació I2CAT, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Miguel Angel Galarza; moc.liamg@leugim.azralag

Received 15 September 2016; Revised 20 December 2016; Accepted 16 January 2017; Published 15 February 2017

Academic Editor: Radu Danescu

Copyright © 2017 Miguel Angel Galarza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. de Miranda and J. S. Germaine, “New direction and trends for vehicle entertainment systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-36-0518, SAE International, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Shinar, M. Meir, and I. Ben-Shoham, “How automatic is manual gear shifting?” Human Factors, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 647–654, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Road Safety Performance Index, “RANKING EU PROGRESS. 10th road safety performance index report,” Tech. Rep., 2016. View at Google Scholar
  4. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, “Traffic safety facts,” Report no. DOTHS812293, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  5. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, “Distracted driving 2014,” Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 260, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  6. B.-M. Swanson, “Distracted Driving causes nearly 40%, automotive fleet,” 2000, 20-21.
  7. IRU (International Road Transport Union), “A scientific Study ‘ETAC’ European truck accident causation, executive summary and recommendations,” Tech. Rep., IRU (International Road Transport Union), Brussels, Brussels, 2007, View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Jin, H. Xian, Q. Niu, and J. Bie, “Research on safety evaluation model for in-vehicle secondary task driving,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 81, pp. 243–250, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. European Commission, “Annual accident report 2015,” Tech. Rep., European Commission, ‎Brussels‎, Belgium, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Melorose, R. Perroy, S. Careas et al., “Temporal fluctuations in driving demand: the effect of traffic complexity on subjective measures of workload and driving performance,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 22, pp. 207–217, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Institute for Road Safety Research, “SWOV Fact sheet (The influence of weather on road safety),” Tech. Rep., Institute for Road Safety, Leidschendam, The Netherlands, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Lancaster and R. Ward, “The contribution of individual factors to driving behaviour: implications for managing work-related road safety,” Research Report 020, Health and Safety Authority, London, UK, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. D. Wickens, “Processing resources in attention, dual task performance, and workload assessment,” in Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and R. Davies, Eds., Academic Press, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  14. T. Brown, D. Marshall, J. Moeckli, and T. Smyser, “A Final Report of SAfety Vehicle(s) using adaptive interface technology (SAVE-IT) program: task 14a evaluation,” Tech. Rep., 2007. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Amditis, L. Andreone, A. Polychronopoulos, and J. Engström, “Design and development of an adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface: overview of the AIDE project,” in Proceedings of the 16th IFAC Conference, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 103–108, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.
  16. C. Baber, “Generic intelligent driver support: a comprehensive report of GIDS,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 195–196, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. European Commission Project, “DRIVE II, application of a real-time intelligent aid for driving and navigation enhancement (ARIADNE),” Project V2004/14, European Commission, Geel, Belgium, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. S. Park and K.-H. Kim, “Adaptive multimodal in-vehicle information system for safe driving,” ETRI Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 626–636, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. Commission of the European Communities, “ESoP-European Statement of Principles on human-machine interface,” Tech. Rep., Commission of the European Communities, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA, 2010.
  21. J. Nielsen, “Usability heuristics,” in Usability Engineering, chapter 5, pp. 115–163, Elsevier, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. Gruhn, “Human machine interface (HMI) design: the good, the bad, and the ugly (and what makes them so),” in Proceedings of the 66th Annual Instrumentation Symposium for the Process Industries, pp. 27–29, College Station, Tex, USA, January 2011.
  23. J. Nielsen and T. K. Landauer, “A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems,” in Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93), pp. 206–213, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. A. Green and J.-S. Park, “Evaluation of a navigation radio using the think-aloud method,” International Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 2013, Article ID 705086, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. de Waard, A. Kruizinga, and K. A. Brookhuis, “The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 818–828, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus