International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2011 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 140310 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/140310

Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review

Academic Editor: J. M. Goldberg
Received01 Apr 2011
Accepted21 May 2011
Published15 Jul 2011

Abstract

Introduction. Endometriosis is one of the most common benign disorders which affects 10–15% of all women in reproductive age. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer has been frequently described in the medical literature. Purpose. To evaluate the literature for evidence of a correlation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Method. the English language literature (online MEDLINE and EMBASE database) was searched using the keywords endometriosis combined with cancer, tumour, tumor, carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma. All abstracts between January 1985 and August 2010 were reviewed. Full relevant articles were critically assessed. Reference lists of included studies were checked. Results. Seven out of the eight studies, included in our review, have shown an increased risk of ovarian cancer. However, the effect size is modest (OR, RR, and SIR) ranging between 1.32 and 1.9 (95% CI). A causative relationship between the two incidences cannot be confirmed. There is increasing evidence on the role of genetic mutations in ovarian clear-cell and endometrioid carcinoma developing from endometriosis. Conclusion. More evidence is needed before suggesting any change in the current management of endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecological disorders. It affects 10–15% of all women in the reproductive years [1]. The incidence is 40–60% in women with dysmenorrhoea and 20–30% in those with subfertility [1]. Although endometriosis is recognised as a benign disease, its association with ovarian cancer has been frequently described in the medical literature since 1925. In that year, Sampson established the first histopathological criteria, which are still in use, to identify malignant tumours rising from endometriosis: (1) clear evidence of endometriosis close to the tumour, (2) the carcinoma must be seen to arise in endometriosis, and not to be invading it from other sources, and (3) presence of tissue resembling endometrial stroma surrounding characteristic glands [2]. Later in 1953, Scott has added a fourth criterion which is the demonstration of a histology-proven transition from benign endometriosis to cancer [3]. The application of all these four criteria has rarely been fulfilled in the literature, which supports the idea that the malignant transformation of endometriosis is a rare event [4]. Yet, their stringent use may lead to underestimate the real frequency of this phenomenon [4].

The aim of this paper is to systematically review the literature evidence of a correlation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer.

2. Methods

A protocol-driven systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) guidance. [5] The English language literature (online MEDLINE and EMBASE database) was searched using the keywords: endometriosis combined with cancer, tumour, tumor, carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma. All abstracts between January 1985 and August 2010 were reviewed and full articles of relevant publications in English language were retrieved. A further systematic analysis of the publications included in the reference lists was performed. All up-to-date reviews on the same topic in the literature were assessed according to Glasgow appraisal tool [6]. Case reports and case series studies were excluded from our review.

3. Results

Seven reviews were found in the literature [4, 712], which have addressed the association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. A summarizing table of the reviews’ findings was modified from the Glasgow appraisal tool (Table 1) [6].


ReviewLanguage of literature searchedType of studies includedQuality assessment tool used in the reviewOverall resultsApplication of results

Ness 2003 [7]EnglishIn vitro, animal, clinical, and epidemiologic studiesNot specifiedConsistent with the association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer.Possible chemoprevention for women with endometriosis.
Somigliana et al. 2006 [4]EnglishObservational, cohort, and case-controlStudies have been critically analysed.Increased risk of ovarian cancers: effect size: 1.3–1.9.Modifications of the standard treatment options for the disease are not justifiable.
Vigano et al. 2007 [8]EnglishObservational, cohort, and case-control epidemiologic, biological, and genetic studiesNineriteria, by Austin Bradford Hill [13]The criterion of strength has not been fulfilled. There were insufficient data for four criteria, and four criteria were fulfilled.The low magnitude of the risk observed is consistent with the view that ectopic endometrium undergoes malignant transformation with a frequency similar to its eutopic counterpart.
Nezhat et al. 2008 [9]EnglishObservational, cohort, and case-control epidemiologic, histopathological, and molecular studiesNot specified Histological transition from benign endometriosis to ovarian malignancy.The malignant potential of endometriosis holds serious implications for management.
Baldi et al. 2008 [10]EnglishNot specifiedNot specifiedFurther epidemiological and genetic studies are required.Appropriate physical screening and imaging testing are recommended.
Vlahos et al. 2010 [11]No search criteria specifiedNo search criteria specifiedNot specifiedEndometriosis is  associated with specific types of ovarian cancer (endometrioid and clear cell).More studies are needed to establish the risk factors that may lead to malignant transformation.
Kobayashi 2010 [12]EnglishStudies on screening, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, natural history, preclinical and clinical trials, and promising molecular targets on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).Not specifiedOvarian endometrioma could be viewed as a neoplastic process.Understanding the mechanisms of endometriosis development and elucidating its pathogenesis and pathophysiology are intrinsic to prevention.

In our review, 11 studies were identified, which addressed the association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer [1424]. To remove the selection bias, studies on the subfertility patients with endometriosis [14, 15] and studies on endometriomas instead of endometriosis [16] were excluded. Eight studies were included in the list [1724]. Seven out of the eight studies have shown an increased risk of ovarian cancer. However, the effect size is modest (odd ratio OR, relative risk RR, and standardized incidence ratio SIR), ranging between 1.32 and 1.9 (95% CI) Figure 1.

In epidemiological terms, when the RR is less than 2, a careful assessment of the confounding factors must be conducted before any conclusion of causality can be made [25, 26]. The previous epidemiologic definition was considered when we selected the studies. Table 2 summarises the types, sample size, followup time, confounding factors, and limitation of each one of the eight studies included in our review.


Name of studyTypeMean of followup (years)Size of endometriosis cohortOvarian cancer cases identified in the cohortConfounding factors consideredMain limitations

Aris 2010, Canada   [17]Retrospective cross-sectional9252141Age, pregnancies, family history, race, oral contraceptive, tubal ligation, hysterectomy and breastfeedingRetrospective collection of data using a coded computerised system. Selection bias
Borgfeldt and Andolf 2004, Sweden. [18]Case-control1028,16381Age and parityUse of cohort of women discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of endometriosis. This may lead to including women with moderate and severe endometriosis (hospital stay patients) without minimal and mild cases. This may overestimate the risk ratio. Selection bias.
Brinton et al. 1997, Sweden.     [19]Retrospective cohort study11.420,68629Age and length of history of endometriosis
Melin et al. 2006, Sweden.     [20]Retrospective cohort study12.764,492122Age and type of surgery performed.
Melin et al. 2007, Sweden.     [21]Retrospective cohort study13.463 630134Age, parity, and type of surgery performed
Modugno et al. 2004, USA. [22]Case-control177Age, parity, oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, family history of ovarian cancer, and study site, gynaecological surgical proceduresRecall and selection bias, as the authors pooled data on the history of endometriosis reported by patients.
Ness et al. 2000. USA. [23]Case-control66Age, history of ovarian cancer, parity, breastfeeding, type and length of each contraceptive, tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovarian operations.Data was collected by case interviews. Recall bias. Low participation rates among cases and controls.
Olsen et al. 2002, USA [24]Prospective cohort study.131,3923Age, education, marital status, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, parity, oral contraceptive use, HRT, history of hysterectomy or dilatation and curettage, BMI and waist to hip ratio.Reliance on self-reports of endometriosis in this cohort (a questionnaire). Recall bias. The number of women who developed ovarian cancer is quite limited.

4. Discussion

Despite the studies presented, the risk of ovarian cancer among patients with endometriosis has always been contentious. Endometriosis is usually confirmed by laparoscopic or histological examination, and many patients are unaware of having the disorder. Therefore, identifying endometriosis as a preceding factor of ovarian cancer is not possible in many cases. On the other hand, the natural history of ovarian cancer is not well understood and the origin of the precursor cell, especially for endometrioid and clear-cell variants, is questionable. For these reasons, all studies in the literature would struggle to establish a causal relationship between the two entities. In this updated review we have tried to assess the epidemiologic evidence in the literature and to discuss our findings in view of the other genetic, immunological, and biological relevant studies.

In our review we have found another group of eight epidemiologic studies that correlated endometriosis with endometrioid and/or clear-cell ovarian carcinoma as a specific histological subtype [2734]. They all reported a specific link between endometriosis and endometrioid and/or clear-cell ovarian carcinoma, with an OR ranging between 3.7 and 35.4 (CI 95%). We have excluded these case series studies from our meta-analysis as there were not case-control or cohort studies.

In a previous review, Somigliana et al. included two other studies which assessed the risk of endometriosis on ovarian cancer in infertile patients [4]. In the first study, infertile patients with endometriosis had the highest risk with an SIR of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.3–4.2) compared to the general population and an SIR of 4.2 (95% CI, 2.0–7.7) for the group with primary infertility [15]. In the second study, endometriosis and unknown cause of infertility resulted in an independently associated elevation in ovarian cancer risk after adjustment for standard confounding factors (odds ratios (OR) 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1–2.7) and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0–1.4), resp.,) [14]. As infertility involves multiple confounding factors, and to remove the selection bias in our review, these two studies were excluded from our review.

Additionally, we have excluded another study conducted by Kobayashi et al.’s in Japan. They documented only endometriomas and evaluated the risk of ovarian cancer based on varying time periods from time of diagnosis of endometrioma [16]. Kobayashi et al. study did not account for patients with extraovarian endometriosis and only approximately one-third of these patients had surgically confirmed endometriomas, with the remaining diagnoses made based on ultrasonographic findings and physical exam only [16]. During followup of up to 17 years, 46 incidental ovarian cancers were identified, translating into a standardized incidence ratio of 8.95. This risk increased with age, with an incidence ratio of 13.2 in women over age 50 [16].

Many genetic, biological, and immunological studies have tried to address the causal relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Different types of genomic instability and mutations have been shown to occur in endometriosis and ovarian cancer [35, 36]. Moreover, microsatellite analysis has demonstrated that loss of heterozygosity on p16 (Ink4), GALT (galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase) and p53, as well as on APOA2 (apolipoprotein A), a region frequently lost in ovarian cancer, occurs in endometriosis [37]. Another study by Baxter et al. has found the GSTM1 (glutathione S-transferase M1) null allele not to be an endometriosis susceptibility allele [38]. However, it may predispose endometriotic lesions to malignant transformation to endometrioid and clear-cell ovarian cancer [38]. Overexpression of p53, oncogenic K-ras Pten deletion, and loss of heterozygosity may also be involved in the endometriosis transformation to ovarian cancer [3941].

A vital factor in the development of both endometriosis and malignancy is considered to be angiogenesis. In a study by Hayrabedyan et al., the expression of several angiogenic factors (interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), Fibroblast growth factor FGF-1, and S100A13) and a common pan-ovarian carcinoma antigen were investigated, in several cases of adenomyosis and ovarian endometriosis [42]. They have shown that the common ovarian carcinoma marker, as well as these angiogenic factors, was expressed in most of the studied cases, implying possible common pathological mechanisms shared between endometriosis and malignancy [42]. In another study, Chou et al. illustrated that the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression rate was higher in ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis than in isolated ovarian carcinoma (27.8% versus 5.6%, 𝑃 = 0 . 0 8 3 ) [43]. They suggested that COX-2 over-expression may be a result of the malignant transformation of endometriosis to endometrioid type ovarian cancer or may represent an interaction between the two cellular components [43]. By contrast, Keita et al. suggested alteration in the expression of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist IL-1RA, a key protector against tumorigenic effects of IL-1, as a possible link between the endometrium, endometriosis, and endometrioid ovarian cancer [44].

Recently, Wiegand et al. published new data implicating ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A) as a tumor-suppressor gene frequently disrupted in ovarian clear-cell and endometrioid carcinomas [45]. They have found ARID1A mutations in 55 of 119 ovarian clear-cell carcinomas (46%), 10 of 33 endometrioid carcinomas (30%), and none of the 76 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas [45]. They demonstrated that the loss of the BAF250a protein was correlated strongly with the ovarian clear-cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma subtypes and the presence of ARID1A mutations [45]. By comparing ovarian clear-cell carcinomas to their contiguous atypical endometriotic lesions in two patients, they have shown that the same mutations may be present in the putative precursor lesions and in the tumors. In contrast, the distant endometriotic lesions do not have ARID1A mutations [45].

It seems, from the previous discussion, that there is insufficient evidence to suggest a specific gene mutation or a specific biological pathway that predisposes endometriosis patients to ovarian cancer. There is good evidence, however, to demonstrate the potential transformation from endometriosis to ovarian endometriosis cell and clear-cell carcinoma. The association between the two entities with an effect size of 1.32–1.9 may be due to sharing similar risk factors, rather than a causal relation.

5. Conclusion

There is increased risk of ovarian cancers, specifically endometrioid and clear-cell carcinoma, in women with endometriosis. The estimated effect size, however, is modest varying between 1.32 and 1.9. A causative relationship between the two incidences cannot be confirmed. However, there is increasing evidence on the role of genetic mutations in ovarian clear-cell and endometrioid carcinoma developing from endometriosis. There are few gene mutations involved, and yet more evidence is needed before generalising any mutation screening test or changing the treatment of endometriosis to include radical excision in case of a positive genetic mutation.

References

  1. Epidemiology and aetiology of endometriosis, Annual Evidence Update(2009), Women’s Health Specialist Library, 2010, http://www.library.nhs.uk/womenshealth/ViewResource.aspx?resID=307258.
  2. J. A. Sampson, “Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary arising in endometrial tissue in that organ,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 10, pp. 1–72, 1925. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. B. Scott, “Malignant changes in endometriosis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 283–289, 1953. View at: Google Scholar
  4. E. Somigliana, P. Vigano', F. Parazzini, S. Stoppelli, E. Giambattista, and P. Vercellini, “Association between endometriosis and cancer: a comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 331–341, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Akers, R. Aguiar-Ibáñez, A. Baba-Akbari Sari et al., Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YorK, UK, 2009.
  6. C. B. Del Mar and P. P. Glasziou, ‘Antibiotics for sore throat’ (Cochrane review) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 1999 (Oxford) Glasgow appraisal tool, Systematic Review Study Group, http://ssrc.tums.ac.ir/SystematicReview/Glasgow.asp.
  7. R. B. Ness, “Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: thoughts on shared pathophysiology,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 280–294, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Vigano, E. Somigliana, F. Parazzini, and P. Vercellini, “Bias versus causality: interpreting recent evidence of association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 588–593, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Nezhat, M. S. Datta, V. Hanson, T. Pejovic, C. Nezhat, and C. Nezhat, “The relationship of endometriosis and ovarian malignancy: a review,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1559–1570, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Baldi, M. Campioni, and P. G. Signorile, “Endometriosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy and association with cancer (Review),” Oncology Reports, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 843–846, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  11. N. F. Vlahos, K. P. Economopoulos, and S. Fotiou, “Endometriosis, in vitro fertilisation and the risk of gynaecological malignancies, including ovarian and breast cancer,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Kobayashi, “Screening, epidemiology, molecular biology, and treatment strategies for endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer,” Reproductive Medicine and Biology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. B. Hill, “The environment and disease: association or causation?” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 58, pp. 295–300, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. B. Ness, D. W. Cramer, M. T. Goodman et al., “Infertility, fertility drugs, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. A. Brinton, E. J. Lamb, K. S. Moghissi et al., “Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 405–414, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Kobayashi, K. Sumimoto, N. Moniwa et al., “Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: a cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Aris, “Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a ten-year cohort study of women living in the Estrie Region of Quebec, Canada,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 3, no. 1, article no. 2, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Borgfeldt and E. Andolf, “Cancer risk after hospital discharge diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts and endometriosis,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 395–400, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  19. L. A. Brinton, G. Gridley, I. Persson, J. Baron, and A. Bergqvist, “Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 1274–1275, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. Melin, P. Sparen, I. Persson, and A. Bergqvist, “Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1237–1242, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Melin, P. Sparén, and A. Bergqvist, “The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 3021–3026, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Modugno, R. B. Ness, G. O. Allen, J. M. Schildkraut, F. G. Davis, and M. T. Goodman, “Oral contraceptive use, reproductive history, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 733–740, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. B. Ness, J. A. Grisso, C. Cottreau et al., “Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer,” Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. E. Olson, J. R. Cerhan, C. A. Janney, K. E. Anderson, C. M. Vachon, and T. A. Sellers, “Postmenopausal cancer risk after self-reported endometriosis diagnosis in the Iowa Women's Health Study,” Cancer, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1612–1618, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. J. Rothman and C. Poole, “A strengthening programme for weak associations,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 955–959, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  26. L. A. Brinton, E. J. Lamb, K. S. Moghissi et al., “Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 405–414, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Vercellini, F. Parazzini, G. Bolis et al., “Endometriosis and ovarian cancer,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 181–182, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  28. E. Oral, S. Ilvan, E. Tustas et al., “Prevalence of endometriosis in malignant epithelial ovary tumours,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 109, pp. 97–101, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  29. R. Sainz De La Cuesta, J. H. Eichhorn, L. W. Rice, A. F. Fuller, N. Nikrui, and B. A. Goff, “Histologic transformation of benign endometriosis to early epithelial ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 238–244, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. Toki and K. Nakayama, “Proliferative activity and genetic alterations in TP53 in endometriosis,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 50, pp. 33–38, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Ogawa, T. Kaku, S. Amada et al., “Ovarian endometriosis associated with ovarian carcinoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 298–304, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Vercellini, G. Scarfone, G. Bolis, G. Stellato, S. Carinelli, and P. G. Crosignani, “Site of origin of epithelial ovarian cancer: the endometriosis connection,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 1155–1157, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. Jimbo, H. Yoshikawa, T. Onda, T. Yasugi, A. Sakamoto, and Y. Taketani, “Prevalence of ovarian endometriosis in epithelial ovarian cancer,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Fukunaga, K. Nomura, E. Ishikawa, and S. Ushigome, “Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours,” Histopathology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 249–255, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Fishman, D. Demirel, R. Laucirica et al., “Malignant tumors arising in endometriosis: clinical-pathological study and flow cytometry analysis,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Wu, Z. Basir, A. Kajdacsy-Balla et al., “Resolution of clonal origins for endometriotic lesions using laser capture microdissection and the human androgen receptor (HUMARA) assay,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 710–717, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. G. Goumenou, D. A. Arvanitis, I. M. Matalliotakis, E. E. Koumantakis, and D. A. Spandidos, “Microsatellite DNA assays reveal an allelic imbalance in p16Ink4, GALT, p53, and APOA2 loci in patients with endometriosis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 160–165, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. W. Baxter, E. J. Thomas, and I. G. Campbell, “GSTM1 null polymorphism and susceptibility to endometriosis and ovarian cancer,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–65, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  39. R. Sainz De La Cuesta, M. Izquierdo, M. Canamero, J. J. Granizo, and F. Manzarbeitia, “Increased prevalence of p53 overexpression from typical endometriosis to atypical endometriosis and ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  40. D. M. Dinulescu, T. A. Ince, B. J. Quade, S. A. Shafer, D. Crowley, and T. Jacks, “Role of K-ras and Pten in the development of mouse models of endometriosis and endometrioid ovarian cancer,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. H. Prowse, S. Manek, R. Varma et al., “Molecular genetic evidence that endometriosis is a precursor of ovarian cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 556–562, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Hayrabedyan, M. Mourdjeva, S. Kyurkchiev, and I. Kehayov, “Immunofluorescent localization of Il-1α, FGF-1, S100A13 as angiogenic factors and a specific ovarian cancer marker (ovac) in endometriosis,” Clinical Application of Immunology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 310–315, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  43. Y.-C. Chou, Y.-J. Chen, C.-R. Lai, P.-H. Wang, Hsin-Chan, and C.-C. Yuan, “Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is higher in ovarian cancer tissue adjacent to endometriosis than in ovarian cancer without comorbid endometriosis,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  44. M. Keita, P. Bessette, M. Pelmus, Y. Ainmelk, and A. Aris, “Expression of interleukin-1 (IL-1) ligands system in the most common endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer subtypes,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1757–2215, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. C. Wiegand, S. P. Shah, O. M. Al-Agha et al., “ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 16, pp. 1532–1543, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Ahmad Sayasneh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

3058 Views | 1066 Downloads | 42 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.