Table of Contents
ISRN Dentistry
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 285624, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/285624
Research Article

Relationship between Operator Skill and In Vitro Microleakage of Different Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations

1Division of Conservative and Adhesive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, University of Liège, 4020 Liège, Belgium
2CHU-Policlinique Brull, Quai G. Kurth, P.O. Box 45, 4020 Liège, Belgium

Received 23 September 2010; Accepted 1 November 2010

Academic Editors: C. P. Lin and G. H. Sperber

Copyright © 2011 Audrey Guéders and Sabine Geerts. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Vargas, S. Inoue et al., “Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 6, supplement, pp. 119–144, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. B. Van Meerbeek, J. De Munck, Y. Yoshida et al., “Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 215–235, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Bradna, R. Vrbova, M. Dudek, A. Roubickova, and D. Housova, “Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis,” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 423–429, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. A. Vargas and E. J. Swift, “Microleakage of resin composites with wet versus dry bonding,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 187–189, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Apap, “Adhésifs auto-mordançants: un bon plan ?” Information Dentaire Année, vol. 43, pp. 2804–2816, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Peumans, A. Poitevin et al., “Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes,” Dental Materials, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. e100–e121, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Degrange and B. Lapostolle, “L’expérience des batailles des adhésifs,” Information Dentaire Année, vol. 89, pp. 112–118, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Giachetti, D. S. Russo, F. Bertini, F. Pierleoni, and M. Nieri, “Effect of operator skill in relation to microleakage of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 289–293, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Giachetti, D. S. Russo, C. Bambi, M. Nieri, and F. Bertini, “Influence of operator skill on microleakege of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Jacobsen, “Bonding of resin to dentin. Interactions between materials, substrate and operators,” Swedish Dental Journal, no. 160, supplement, pp. 1–66, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Miyazaki, H. Onose, and B. K. Moore, “Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 101–104, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Cao, S. Geerts, A. Guéders, A. Albert, L. Seidel, and J. Charpentier, “Experimental comparison of cavity sealing ability of five dental adhesive systems after thermocycling,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Peumans, J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek, “Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 512–518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. P. Ernst, T. Kötter, A. Victor, K. Canbek, M. Brandenbusch, and B. Willershausen, “Marginal integrity of self- and total-etching adhesives in two different application protocols,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Ferrari, M. C. Cagidiaco, G. Kugel, and C. L. Davidson, “Dentin infiltration by three adhesive systems in clinical and laboratory conditions,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 240–244, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Fortin, E. J. Swift Jr., G. E. Denehy, and J. W. Reinhardt, “Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives,” Dental Materials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Frankenberger, J. Perdigao, B. T. Rosa, and M. Lopes, ““No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives—a microtensile bond strength and morphological study,” Dental Materials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 373–380, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Grégoire, S. Joniot, P. Guignes, and A. Millas, “Dentin permeability: self-etching and one-bottle dentin bonding systems,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 42–49, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. T. Hara, C. M. Amaral, L. A. F. Pimenta, and M. A. C. Sinhoreti, “Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 181–184, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. R. Holtan, G. P. Nystrom, P. S. Olin, R. A. Phelps, J. J. Phillips, and W. H. Douglas, “Bond strength of six dentinal adhesives,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Inoue, M. A. Vargas, Y. Abe et al., “Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237–245, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. M. Owens and W. W. Johnson, “Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 303–308, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Pilo and A. Ben-Amar, “Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents,” The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 209–213, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. J. Swift, P. T. Triolo, W. W. Barkmeier, J. L. Bird, and S. J. Bounds, “Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 100–104, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Peumans, M. Verschueren et al., “Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1690–1702, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Van Meerbeek, J. De Munck, D. Mattar, K. Van Landuyt, and P. Lambrechts, “Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 647–660, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. D. Brandt, F. A. de Wet, and I. C. du Preez, “Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation,” Journal of the South African Dental Association, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 248–251, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. P. Ernst, “Options for dentin bonding,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Frankenberger, N. Krämer, M. Pelka, and A. Petschelt, “Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 208–215, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Goracci, E. Bertelli, and M. Ferrari, “Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems,” Quintessence International, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Omar, W. El-Badrawy, O. El-Mowafy, O. Atta, and B. Saleem, “Microtensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to caries-affected dentin with three adhesives,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. I. Rosales-Leal, “Microleakage of class v composite restorations placed with etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives before and after thermocycling,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 9, supplement 2, pp. 255–259, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  33. E. Schittly, C. Besnault, D. Bouter, N. D. Ruse, M. Degrange, and J. P. Attal, “Influence of self-etching primer preapplication on the dentin-titanium shear bond strength mediated by a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112–116, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Peumans, S. Gladys, M. Braem, P. Lambrechts, and G. Vanherle, “Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions,” Quintessence International, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 775–784, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. Van Meerbeek, Y. Yoshida, P. Lambrechts et al., “A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 50–59, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Vichi, S. Grandini, C. L. Davidson, and M. Ferrari, “An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions,” Dental Materials, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 495–502, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. O. A. Adebayo, M. F. Burrow, and M. J. Tyas, “Bond strength test: role of operator skill,” Australian Dental Journal, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. F. Chuang, J. K. Liu, C. C. Chao, F. P. Liao, and Y. H. M. Chen, “Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Sano, N. Kanemura, M. F. Burrow, N. Inai, T. Yamada, and J. Tagami, “Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: student vs. dentists,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. El Arrouf, M. Sakout, and F. Abdallaoui, “Protection pulpo-dentinaire et adhésion: évolution des concepts biologiques et implications cliniques en pratique quotidienne,” Revue d'Odonto-Stomatologie, vol. 39, pp. 112–133, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  41. W. J. Finger and M. Balkenhol, “Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus