[Retracted] Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion

<table>Skeletal and dental variables. (a) (1) SNA; (2) SNB; (3) ANB; (b) (4) Björk sum (<i>α</i> + <i>β</i> + <i>γ</i>); (c) (5) Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA); (6) U1-FH; (7) Upper occlusal plane to the palatal plane angle (UOP-PP). <i>α</i>: means the saddle angle; <i>β</i>: articular angle; <i>γ</i>: gonial angle.</table>

International Scholarly Research Notices

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: [Retracted] Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion 

Figure 2 | [Retracted] Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion 