Table of Contents
ISRN Zoology
Volume 2011, Article ID 328670, 60 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/328670
Research Article

Secondary Sexual Characteristics in the Galerucinae (Sensu Stricto) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

148 Jalan SS 15/3A, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
2National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA

Received 27 January 2011; Accepted 3 March 2011

Academic Editors: M. Kuntner and T. Miyata

Copyright © 2011 M. S. Mohamedsaid and D. G. Furth. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. J. Gillespie, D. W. Tallamy, E. G. Riley, and A. I. Cognato, “Molecular phylogeny of rootworms and related galerucine beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 195–222, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H. Stapel, H. Misof, and T. Wagner, “A Molecular and morphological analysis of Afrotropical Monolepta species and related Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. X. Scherz and T. Wagner, “Revision of Afrocandezea Wagner & Scherz, 2002 from tropical Africa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae),” Entomologische Zeitschrift—Sttutgart, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 161–183, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. F. Lawrence and A. F. Newton, “Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera,” in Biology, Phylogeny and Classification of Coleoptera, J. Pakaluk and S. A. Slipinski, Eds., pp. 779–1006, Museum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, Poland, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  5. T. N. Seeno and J. A. Wilcox, “Leaf beetle genera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Entomography, vol. 1, pp. 1–221, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. G. Furth and K. Suzuki, “Character correlation studies of problematic genera of Alticinae in relation to Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Chrysomelidae, D. G. Furth, Ed., pp. 116–135, Backhuys, Beijing, Japan, 1994.
  7. S. W. Lingafelter, A. S. Konstantinov, and J. E. Lee, “Systena Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae): notes on nomenclature, redescription of the genus, and a preliminary discussion of characters and phylogenetic relationships,” Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 467–483, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. J. Kim, K. M. Kjer, and C. N. Duckett, “Comparison between molecular and morphological-based phylogenies of galerucine/alticine leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Insect Systematics and Evolution, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Mayr, Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw–Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
  10. L. Hedlund, “Factors affecting differential mating success in male crested newts, Triturus cristatus,” Journal of Zoology, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Andersson, Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994.
  12. W. G. Eberhard, Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1985.
  13. W. G. Eberhard, “Postcopulatory sexual selection: darwin's omission and its consequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, supplement 1, pp. 10025–10032, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. W. G. Eberhard, “Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Jolivet, “Hypertelie: mimetisme, signaux sexuels ou moyens de defense. Un dilemma chez les insects: vrai ou faux concept?” L’Entomologie, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 57–66, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Maulik, “On a structure in the antennae of beetles of the chrysomelid genus Agetocera,” Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 943–956, 1932. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Maulik, The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1936.
  18. D. H. Blake, “A review of some galerucine beetles with excised middle tibiae in the male,” Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 108, pp. 59–101, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. H. Blake, “More new galerucine beetles with excised middle tibiae in the male,” Proceedings of United States National Museum, vol. 118, pp. 233–266, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. A. Wilcox, “A synopsis of the North American Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Bulletin of the New York State Museum Survey, vol. 400, pp. 1–226, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Silfverberg, “A revision of the genus Prosmidia Weise (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae),” Acta Zoologica Fennica, vol. 139, pp. 1–54, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  22. H Silfverberg, “A generic revision of the group Prosmidiites (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Entomologica Scandinavica, vol. 13, pp. 173–182, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Freund and T. H. Wagner, “Revision of Bonesioides Laboissière, 1925 (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae; Galerucinae) from continental Africa,” Journal of Natural History, vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 1915–1976, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. G. F. Barroga and M. S. Mohamedsaid, “Phylogeny of the genus Aulacophora chevrolat (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) in sundaland,” The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 338–358, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. A. M. Reid, “Reappraisal of the genus Taumacera Thunberg with descriptions of two new species from South-East Asia (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae),” Australian Journal of Entomology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Wagner, “An introduction to the revision of the afrotropical Monolepta and related taxa (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae),” CFS Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, no. 215, pp. 215–220, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Wagner, “Monolepta Chevrolat, 1837, the most speciose galerucine taxon: redescription of the type species Monolepta bioculata (Fabricius, 1781) and key to related genera from (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera),” Journal of Natural History, vol. 41, no. 1–4, pp. 81–100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Bezděk, “New species and subspecies of Nymphius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Iran and Turkey,” Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. P. Moller and A. Pomiankowski, “Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments?” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 167–176, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. R. A. Johnstone, “Multiple displays in animal communication:'backup signals' and 'multiple messages',” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 351, no. 1337, pp. 329–338, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  31. W. G. Eberhard, “Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot,” The American Naturalist, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 420–427, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  32. E. A. Hallem, A. Dahanukar, and J. R. Carlson, “Insect odor and taste receptors,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 51, pp. 113–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. S. Clark, “The western North American genus Androlyperus Crotch, 1873 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae),” Insecta Mundi, vol. 13, no. 3-4, pp. 217–222, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. S. Konstantinov and B. A. Korotyaev, “Sexual dimorphism and size of aedeagi in apionid weevils (Coleoptera: Apionidae) and flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): why some masculine males have small aedeagi,” Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 324–338, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. S. Mohamedsaid and G. F. Barroga, “A study on the morphology of antenna and aedeagus in males of Aulacophora Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae),” Oriental Insects, vol. 44, pp. 405–414, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  36. P. S. M. Hill, “Vibration and animal communication: a review,” American Zoologist, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1135–1142, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  37. P. E. Howse, “The significance of the sound produced by the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Hagen),” Animal Behaviour, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 284–300, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  38. F. Roces and B. Holldobler, “Vibrational communication between hitchhikers and foragers in leaf-cutting ants (Atta cephalotes),” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 297–302, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. M. S. Mohamedsaid, “The Galerucinae with sound production devices (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Entomologische Zeitschrif—Stuttgart, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. 259–262, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Schmitt, “Stridulatory devices of leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and other Coleoptera,” in Advances in Coleopterology, M. Zunini, X. Belles, and M. Blas, Eds., pp. 263–280, AEC, Torino, Italy, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Schmitt, “Stridulation in leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae),” in Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet, Ed., pp. 319–325, Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Schmitt, “The position of the Megalopodinae and Zeugophorinae in a phylogenetic system of the Chrysomeloidea (Insecta: Coleoptera),” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Chrysomelidae, D.G. Furth, Ed., pp. 38–44, Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1994.
  43. H. E. Hinton, “Secondary sexual characters of Tribolium,” Nature, vol. 149, no. 3783, pp. 500–501, 1942. View at Google Scholar
  44. R. F. Schmitz and M. M. Furniss, “Secondary sex characters of Scolytus laricis,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 61, pp. 1626–1627, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  45. B. W. French and L. Hammack, “Sexual dimorphism of basitarsi in pest species of Diabrotica and Cerotoma (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. P. Jolivet, “What is a Chrysomelid?” Nouvelle Revue Entomologique, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  47. M. S. Mohamedsaid, “Modified antennae of Malaysian Galerucinae and its taxonomic significance,” in New Developments in the Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet, J. A. Santiago-Blay, and M. Schmitt, Eds., pp. 231–247, SPB Acadamic, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  48. D. G. Furth and K. Suzuki, “Studies on Oriental and Australian Alticinae genera, based on the comparative morphology of the metafemoral spring, genitalia, and hind wing venation,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Chrysomelidae, M. Biondi, M. Daccordi, and D. G. Furth, Eds., pp. 91–124, Atti Museo Regionale Scienze Naturali, Torino, Italy, 1998.
  49. A. G. Böving, “Descriptions of larvae of the genera Diabrotica and Phyllobrotica, with a discussion of the taxonomic validity of the subfamilies Galerucinae and Halticinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),” Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 193–205, 1927. View at Google Scholar
  50. A. G. Böving, “Beetle larvae of the subfamily Galerucine,” Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 1–48, 1929. View at Google Scholar
  51. A. G. Böving and F. C. Craighead, “An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera,” Entomologica Americana, vol. 11, pp. 1–351, 1931. View at Google Scholar
  52. F. A. Lawson, “Chrysomelidae,” in Immature Insects, F. Stehr, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 568–585, Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, La, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  53. D. G. Furth and J. E. Lee, “Similarity of the Blepharida-group genera using larval and adult characters (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae),” Journal of the New York Entomological Society, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 26–51, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  54. D. G. Furth, “Inter-generic differences in the metafemoral apodeme of flea beetles (Chrysomelidae: Alticinae),” Systematic Entomology, vol. 5, pp. 263–271, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  55. D. G. Furth, “The metafemoral spring of flea beetles (Chrysomelidae: Alticinae),” Spixiana Supplemente, vol. 7, pp. 11–27, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  56. D. G. Furth, “The jumping apparatus of Flea Beetles—the metafemoral spring,” in Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet, E. Petitpierre, and T. Hsiao, Eds., chapter 17, Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 1988. View at Google Scholar