Table of Contents
ISRN Gastroenterology
Volume 2011, Article ID 467258, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/467258
Clinical Study

LigaSure Haemorrhoidectomy versus Conventional Diathermy for IV-Degree Haemorrhoids: Is It the Treatment of Choice? A Randomized, Clinical Trial

Department of General, Oncological, and Videoassisted Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy

Received 8 September 2010; Accepted 7 October 2010

Academic Editor: C. Y. Yeung

Copyright © 2011 Maurizio Gentile et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. M. MacRae and R. S. McLeod, “Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 687–694, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. T. C. Milligan, C. Naunton Morgan, L. Jones, and R. Officer, “Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids,” The Lancet, vol. 230, no. 5959, pp. 1119–1124, 1937. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. A. Ferguson and J. R. Heaton, “Closed hemorrhoidectomy,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 176–179, 1959. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. H. Ho, W. K. Cheong, C. Tsang et al., “Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1666–1675, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Jayaraman, P. H. Colquhoun, and R. A. Malthaner, “Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, p. CD005393, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Sayfan, A. Becker, and L. Koltun, “Sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy: a new technique,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. S. Kennedy, P. L. Stranahan, K. D. Taylor, and J. G. Chandler, “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 876–878, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. F. Palazzo, D. L. Francis, and M. A. Clifton, “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 154–157, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. C. V. Thorbeck and M. F. Montes, “Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of ligasure compared with Milligan-Morgan operation,” European Journal of Surgery, vol. 168, no. 8-9, pp. 482–484, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. D. G. Jayne, I. Botterill, N. S. Ambrose, T. G. Brennan, P. J. Guillou, and D. S. O'Riordain, “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 428–432, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. G. Milit, M. Gargiani, and F. Cortese, “Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 171–175, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. E. J. Franklin, S. Seetharam, J. Lowney, and P. G. Horgan, “Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1380–1383, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Ortiz, J. Marzo, P. Armendáriz, and M. De Miguel, “Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 809–815, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. S. Nivatvongs, “Hemorrhoids,” in Principles and Practice of Surgery of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus, P. H. Gordon and S. Nivatvongs, Eds., pp. 179–198, Quality Medical, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Agachan, T. Chen, J. Pfeifer, P. Reissman, and S. D. Wexner, “A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 681–685, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. B. Loder and R. K. S. Phillips, “Haemorrhoidectomy,” Current Practice in Surgery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Y. Mastakov, P. G. Buettner, and Y. H. Ho, “Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 229–239, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. D. F. Altomare, G. Milito, R. Andreoli et al., “Ligasure precise vs. conventional diathermy for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 514–519, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. G. Milito, F. Cadeddu, M. G. Muzi, C. Nigro, and A. M. Farinon, “Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 85–93, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. M. Kraemer, T. Parulava, M. Roblick, L. Duschka, and H. Müller-Lobeck, “Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH Stapler vs. Ligasure for hemorrhoidal surgery,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1517–1522, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. V. Filingeri, G. Gravante, E. Baldessari, M. Grimaldi, and C. U. Casciani, “Prospective randomized trial of submucosal hemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. conventional Parks' operation,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. J. Y. Wang, C. Y. Lu, H. L. Tsai et al., “Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 462–466, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. Y. C. Chung and H. J. Wu, “Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus