Clinical Study

Effect of Malunited Midshaft Clavicular Fractures on Shoulder Function

Table 2

Outcome measurements.

Good union ( 𝑁 = 1 5 )Malunion ( 𝑁 = 1 0 ) 𝑃 value

DASH10.61 (range = 0–43, SD = 12)6.59 (range = 0–34, SD = 10.7)0.23
UCLA31.1 (range = 22–35, SD = 3.7)32.6 (range = 26–35, SD = 3.27)0.285
Abduction maximum, strength at 60°/s; difference−5.27% (range = −48%–25%, SD = 18.5)−10.4% (range = −52%–19%, SD=23.9)0.765
Abduction maximum, strength at 120°/s; difference−4.93% (range = −58%–33%, SD = 21.71)−1.3% (range = −42%–30%, SD = 26.71)0.605
Adduction maximum, strength at 60°/s; difference2.67% (range = −39%–54%, SD = 27.42)−3.2% (range = −45%–18%, SD = 21.32)0.605
Adduction maximum, strength 120°/s; difference−0.93% (range = −80%–45%, SD = 35.66)−16.1% (range = 48%–9%, SD=21.26)0.103
Forward flexion difference3% (range = −6%–28%, SD = 8)4% (range = 0%–33%, SD = 10)0.807
Abduction difference3% (range = 0%–28%, SD = 8)3% (range = 0%–28%, SD = 9)0.807
Extension difference1% (range = 0%–22%, SD = 6)0% (range = 0%–0%, SD = 0)0.807
External rotation difference3% (range= 0%–33%, SD = 9)7% (range = 0%–44%, SD = 15)0.765

𝑇 𝑎 𝑏 𝑙 𝑒 2 presents patient measured outcome. Abduction and adduction strengths were measured at angular speed of 60 °/s and 120 °/s. Peak strength was used. The difference between injured and healthy shoulder is given in percentage from the uninjured shoulder.