Table of Contents
ISRN Otolaryngology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 540643, 3 pages
Case Report

Laryngeal Schwannoma: Case Report and Literature Review

ENT Department, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

Received 18 March 2011; Accepted 10 April 2011

Academic Editors: A. A. Aarnisalo, S. L. Halum, and E. Pasquini

Copyright © 2011 Y. Ramakrishnan and W. J. Issing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Neurogenic tumours of the larynx, particularly schwannomas are rare. We report a case report of a schwannoma in a 30-year-old woman which was excised endoscopically. The aim of this paper is to highlight this rare condition and management options to the otolaryngological community.

1. Case Report

A 30-year-old lady presented to the outpatient clinic with progressive dysphonia and exertional dyspnea over a 2-year period. There were no associated systemic symptoms. She was a nonsmoker and consumed alcohol occasionally. On examination, she was dysphonic but not stridulous or dyspneic. Flexible nasoendoscopy revealed a soft tissue swelling in the supraglottic region starting from the posterior commissure blocking the view of the vocal cords. Computer tomography (CT) showed a well circumscribed 1 . 5 × 1 . 4  cm low attenuation midline supraglottic mass, commencing just below the aryepiglottic folds and extending onto sclerotic arytenoids (Figures 3 and 4). The attenuation of this mass was slightly greater than that of fluid, suggesting this could represent a retention cyst containing proteinaceous secretions.

Suspension microlaryngoscopy and biopsy was performed. Intraoperatively, a solid, well-encapsulated lesion was shelled out using cold steel instruments (Figures 1 and 2). The patient was extubated postoperatively and did not require a tracheostomy. Histopathological examination confirmed the presence of an arytenoid schwannoma. 3 months following surgery, no recurrence was evident.

Figure 1: Mass presenting as a submucosal bulge obstructing view of vocal cords.
Figure 2: Postoperative view following complete excision of the schwannoma.
Figure 3: Serial CT axial images of the midline supraglottic mass commencing just below the aryepiglottic folds and extending onto arytenoids.
Figure 4: Serial CT axial images of the midline supraglottic mass commencing just below the aryepiglottic folds and extending onto arytenoids.

2. Introduction

Schwannomas are benign slow-growing tumours that arise from the Schwann cells of any nerve (peripheral, cranial, or autonomic). Those affecting the head and neck are commonly intracranial (e.g., vestibular nerve) or parapharyngeal (arising from glossopharyngeal, vagal, accessory, hypoglossal nerve, and sympathetic chains). Neurogenic tumors of the larynx (e.g., schwannoma or neurofibroma) therefore remain extremely rare. Indeed, it represents less than 1.5% of all benign tumours (the majority being papillomas and chondromas) [1]. It is a slow, growing encapsulated tumour commonly presenting in the 4th and 5th decade of life, especially women. However, it can present at any age. Over 130 cases have been reported in the worldwide literature since it was first described in 1925 [2].

The origin of the schwannoma is presumed to be in the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve [3]. Often however, this is not discernible intraoperatively and likely to originate from the smaller distal nerve fibres in the laryngeal submucosa. The most common anatomical site is the aryepiglottic fold, followed by the arytenoids, ventricular folds, and vocal cord [4, 5]. The risk of malignant transformation of laryngeal schwannoma is very rare [6].

From a clinical perspective, it is vital to differentiate a schwannoma from a neurofibroma for 2 reasons. Firstly, neurofibromas have a higher potential of recurrence and malignancy (approximately 10%). Secondly, the presence of neurofibromas should also alert the physician to the exclusion of neurofibromatosis. The definitive diagnosis is established histologically.

Patients typically present with dysphonia, stridor, dyspnea, dysphagia, globus sensation, or lateral neck lump. On laryngoscopy, most lesions appear as a smooth submucosal lesion, usually confined to the aryepiglottic fold or false vocal cord. It may obstruct the view of the laryngeal inlet and result in reduced mobility of the vocal cord. The latter may be due to “pseudofixation” of the cricoarytenoid joint as a result of mass effect of the lesion [5]. Almost all neurogenic tumors of the larynx arise from the supraglottis, the true vocal cord representing a rare origin site [7].

CT and MRI are valuable in defining the nature and extent of the lesion, with MRI offering superior soft tissue delineation. Typically, the lesion is sharply demarcated, round or oval, isoattenuated with muscle, and often heterogeneously enhanced [8]. Calcification which reflects degenerative change, though rare, has been reported in ancient schwannomas. Schwannoma and neurofibromas cannot be distinguished radiologically due to similar findings. The differential diagnosis includes laryngeal cyst and internal laryngocele.

The definitive diagnosis is performed histologically. Enger and Weiss established three histological criteria for the diagnosis of schwannoma: encapsulation, presence of Antoni A and/or Antoni B stroma, and S-100 protein positivity [9]. In Antoni A (cellular region), the spindle-shaped Schwann cells are compactly arranged with nuclei occasionally lining up in palisades to form Verocay bodies. Antoni B (less cellular) describe loosely arranged spindle Schwann cells within a myxoid matrix. In contrast, neurofibromas are unencapsulated and comprise a variety of cell types: elongated spindle Schwann cells interwoven with axons and collagen fibres. An important feature is that schwannoma grows extrinsic to the nerve fibre whilst in neurofibroma, the tumour is entwined with the parental nerve fascicles [5].

Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment of laryngeal schwannoma. A tracheostomy may be required to secure the airway. The surgical approach depends on the size and location of the lesion. Smaller lesions can be approached endoscopically with or without a laser. Larger tumours may require an external approach, for example, lateral thyrotomy, lateral pharyngotomy, or laryngofissure technique [10]. Wide excision is necessary to prevent recurrence. Rapid regrowth can occur within months following incomplete resection of the schwannoma [5]. Following surgery, restoration of vocal cord mobility has been reported independent of the approach [11, 12].

3. Conclusion

Despite its rarity, neurogenic tumors of the larynx need to be recognised. The primary management involves securing the airway. Despite various imaging modalities, the distinction between Schwannoma and neurofibromas can only be made histologically.

Complete resection of the lesion is necessary to prevent recurrence.


  1. S. R. Jones, E. N. Myers, and L. Barnes, “Benign neoplasms of the larynx,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 151–178, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Zbären and R. Markwalder, “Schwannoma of the true vocal cord,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 837–839, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. M. Nanson, “Neurilemoma of the larynx: a case study,” Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Palva, K. Jokinen, and J. Karja, “Neurilemmoma (schwannoma) of the larynx,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 203–207, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. S. Rosen, A. M. Pou, and F. B. Quinn, “Obstructive supraglottic schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature,” Laryngoscope, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 997–1002, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. L. DeLozier, “Intrinsic malignant schwannoma of the larynx. A case report,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 91, no. 3, part 1, pp. 336–338, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. L. Thomas, “Non-epithelial tumours of the larynx,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1131–1141, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Lin and W. Martel, “Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. M. Woodruff, H. P. Kourea, D. N. Louis, and B. W. Schethauer, “Schwannoma,” in WHO Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumorus of Nervous System, P. Kleihues and W. K. Cavenee, Eds., pp. 164–166, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2nd edition, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Takumida, T. Taira, M. Suzuki, K. Yajin, and Y. Harada, “Neurilemmoma of the larynx: a case report,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 847–850, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  11. W. K. Ho, S. D. C. Lo, and R. W. M. Ng, “Schwannoma of the larynx,” Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 554–555, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Taylor, M. Stiefel, and S. Y. Park, “Schwannoma of the true vocal fold: a rare diagnosis,” Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus