Use of Averaged Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Scores

Table 4

Raw and averaged support scores correlations with PMRS and resultant power.

Total functional support	Correlation	𝑝 value	Power	Change in power
Sample 1*
Raw scores	−.15	.06	.47
Averaged scores	−.31	<.0001	.97	↑.50
Sample 2**
Raw scores	−.15	.02	.68
Averaged scores	−.21	.001	.93	↑.25
Sample 3***
Raw scores	−.06	.41	.13
Averaged scores	−.20	.006	.79	↑.66
Affect
Sample 1
Raw scores	−.13	.10	.37
Averaged scores	−.29	<.0001	.96	↑.59
Sample 2
Raw scores	−.16	.01	.74
Averaged scores	−.24	<.0001	.98	↑.24
Sample 3
Raw scores	−.07	.37	.16
Averaged scores	−.19	.01	.75	↑.59
Affirmation
Sample 1
Raw scores	−.16	.04	.52
Averaged scores	−.30	<.0001	.97	↑.45
Sample 2
Raw scores	−.13	.04	.56
Averaged scores	−.20	.002	.91	↑.35
Sample 3
Raw scores	−.07	.38	.16
Averaged scores	−.21	.003	.83	↑.67
Aid
Sample 1
Raw scores	−.13	.10	.37
Averaged scores	−.17	.04	.57	↑.20
Sample 2
Raw scores	−.13	.03	.56
Averaged scores	−.10	.12	.37	↓.19
Sample 3
Raw scores	−.04	.59	.08
Averaged scores	−.09	.23	.23	↑.15

* 𝑁=157, **𝑁=263, ***𝑁=189.