Table of Contents
ISRN Cardiology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 798318, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/798318
Clinical Study

Clinical Evaluation of the Appropriateness Use Criteria for Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography: Differences by Patient Population, Physician Specialty, and Patient Outcomes

1Department of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, NY 11030-3816, USA
2Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
3Feinstein Institute of Biomedical Research, Graduate Clinical Research Center, Manhasset, New York, NY 11030, USA

Received 14 March 2011; Accepted 4 April 2011

Academic Editor: A. Ganau

Copyright © 2011 Regina S. Druz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. L. Lucas, M. A. DeLorenzo, A. E. Siewers, and D. E. Wennberg, “Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993–2001,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 374–379, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. R. Patel, J. A. Spertus, R. G. Brindis et al., “ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1606–1613, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. G. Brindis, P. S. Douglas, R. C. Hendel et al., “ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, pp. 1587–1605, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. S. Douglas, B. Khandheria, R. F. Stainback et al., “ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 51, pp. 1127–1147, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. C. Hendel, M. R. Patel, C. M. Kramer et al., “ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 3, pp. 751–771, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. R. Patel, G. J. Dehmer, J. W. Hirshfeld, P. K. Smith, and J. A. Spertus, “ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography,” Circulation, vol. 119, pp. 1330–1352, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. P. Ward, M. H. Al-Mallah, G. B. Grossman et al., “American Society of Nuclear Cardiology review of the ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI),” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. e26–e38, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. C. Hendel, D. S. Berman, M. F. Di Carli et al., “ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians,” Circulation, vol. 119, pp. e561–e587, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, January 2009.
  10. ACC News Weekly ACC Advocacy Update, January 2008, http://www.skyscape.com/download/reseller.asp?format=binary&os=win&device=pc&product=spectmpi.
  11. R. J. Gibbons, T. D. Miller, D. Hodge et al., “Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 51, no. 13, pp. 1283–1289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. C. Hendel, “Multicenter assessment of the utilization of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using the ACCF appropriateness criteria: the ACCF and united healthcare SPECT pilot study,” ACC Annual Scientific Session 2009.
  13. Pöschl et al., “Correction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, pp. 2148–2150, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley et al., “ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 33, pp. 2092–2197, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. S. Berman, X. Kang, H. Gransar et al., “Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormality on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is more reproducible than expert visual analysis,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus