Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 807106, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/807106
Review Article

Incidental Prenatal Diagnosis of Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: Health, Behavior, and Fertility

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 11 August 2011; Accepted 8 September 2011

Academic Editors: D. Chen and P. K. Mallmann

Copyright © 2011 J. J. P. M. Pieters et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. G. Linden and B. G. Bender, “Genetic counseling for sex chromosome abnormalities,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Nielsen and M. Wohlert, “Chromosome abnormalities found among 34910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark,” Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 81–83, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. Vaknin, O. Reish, I. Ben-Ami, E. Heyman, A. Herman, and R. Maymon, “Prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormalities: the 8-year experience of a single medical center,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 76–81, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. T. C. Nagel, A. C. Knegt, M. D. Kloosterman, H. I. J. Wildschut, N. J. Leschot, and F. P. H. A. Vandenbussche, “Invasive prenatal diagnosis in the Netherlands, 1991–2000: number of procedures, indications and abnormal results detected,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 148, no. 31, pp. 1538–1543, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. García, D. R. M. Timmermans, and E. Van Leeuwen, “Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. C. Leung, E. T. Lau, W. L. Lau et al., “Rapid aneuploidy testing (knowing less) versus traditional karyotyping (knowing more) for advanced maternal age: what would be missed, who should decide?” Hong Kong Medical Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–13, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. A. Boyd, M. Loane, E. Garne, B. Khoshnood, and H. Dolk, “Sex chromosome trisomies in Europe: prevalence, prenatal detection and outcome of pregnancy,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 231–234, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. L. Davenport, B. J. Crowe, S. H. Travers et al., “Growth hormone treatment of early growth failure in toddlers with turner syndrome: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3406–3416, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. A. Bondy, “Clinical practice guideline: care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 10–25, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. A. Bondy, “New issues in the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome,” Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 269–280, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. A. Paduch, A. Bolyakov, P. Cohen, and A. Travis, “Reproduction in men with Klinefelter syndrome: the past, the present, and the future,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Paduch, R. G. Fine, A. Bolyakov, and J. Kiper, “New concepts in Klinefelter syndrome,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 621–627, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. M. Boormans, E. Birnie, D. Oepkes, R. J. Galjaard, G. H. Schuring-Blom, and J. M. Van Lith, “Comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 297–303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. H. Bui, “Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: gone FISHing, BAC soon!,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 247–251, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Wheeler, D. Peakman, A. Robinson, and G. Henry, “45,X/46,XY mosaicism: contrast of prenatal and postnatal diagnosis,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 565–571, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. J. Pettenati, M. Wheeler, D. J. Bartlett et al., “45,X/47,XYY mosaicism: clinical discrepancy between prenatally and postnatally diagnosed cases,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Y. F. Hsu, “Phenotype/karyotype correlations of Y chromosome aneuploidy with emphasis on structural aberrations in postnatally diagnosed cases,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 108–140, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. D. Koeberl, B. McGillivray, and V. P. Sybert, “Prenatal diagnosis of 45,X/46,XX mosaicism and 45,X: implications for postnatal outcome,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 661–666, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. F. Gunther, E. Eugster, A. J. Zagar, C. G. Bryant, M. L. Davenport, and C. A. Quigley, “Ascertainment bias in turner syndrome: new insights from girls who were diagnosed incidentally in prenatal life,” Pediatrics, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 640–644, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. P. D. Zeger, A. R. Zinn, N. Lahlou et al., “Effect of ascertainment and genetic features on the phenotype of Klinefelter syndrome,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 716–722, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. M. Girardin, E. Lemyre, N. Alos, C. Deal, C. Huot, and G. Van Vliet, “Comparison of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome according to the circumstances of diagnosis: amniocentesis versus clinical signs,” Hormone Research, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. D. Platt and G. R. DeVore, “In utero diagnosis of hydrops fetalis: ultrasound methods,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 627–636, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. E. Ostberg, C. Storry, A. E. Donald, M. J. H. Attar, J. P. J. Halcox, and G. S. Conway, “A dose-response study of hormone replacement in young hypogonadal women: effects on intima media thickness and metabolism,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 557–564, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. P. Warren and A. Chua, “Appropriate use of estrogen replacement therapy in adolescents and young adults with Turner syndrome and hypopituitarism in light of the Women's Health Initiative,” Growth Hormone and IGF Research, vol. 16, supplement, pp. 98–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Schwartz and L. J. Raffel, “Prenatal detection of 45,X/46,XX/47,XXX mosaicism through amniocentesis: mosaicism confirmed in cord blood, amnion, and chorion,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1043–1046, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Saenger, “Turner's syndrome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 23, pp. 1749–1754, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. M. MacLeod and J. M. McHugo, “Prenatal diagnosis of nuchal cystic hygroma,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 64, no. 765, pp. 802–807, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Bruining, H. Swaab, M. Kas, and H. Van Engeland, “Psychiatric characteristics in a self-selected sample of boys with klinefelter syndrome,” Pediatrics, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. e865–e870, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Van Assche, M. Bonduelle, H. Tournaye et al., “Cytogenetics of infertile men,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–24, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Foresta, C. Galeazzi, A. Bettella et al., “Analysis of meiosis in intratesticular germ cells from subjects affected by classic Klinefelter's syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 3807–3810, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. L. Simpson, F. De La Cruz, R. S. Swerdloff et al., “Klinefelter syndrome: expanding the phenotype and identifying new research directions,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 460–468, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Otter, C. T. Schrander-Stumpel, and L. M. Curfs, “Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 265–271, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Clarke, D. Fielding, L. Kerzin-Storrar et al., “The genetic testing of children,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 785–797, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Clarke, “Genetic screening: a response to Nuffield,” Bulletin of Medical Ethics, vol. 97, pp. 13–21, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Hills, C. Donaghue, J. Waters et al., “QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 509–517, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. H. Hsiao, H. C. Wang, C. F. Hsieh, and J. J. Hsu, “Fetal gender screening by ultrasound at 11 to 13+6 weeks,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Odeh, V. Grinin, M. Kais, E. Ophir, and J. Bornstein, “Sonographie fetal sex determination,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus