Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 856027, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/856027
Clinical Study

Effect of Social Service Prenatal Care Utilization on Perinatal Outcomes among Women with Socioeconomic Problems in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan

Received 17 July 2011; Accepted 29 August 2011

Academic Editor: K. Yang

Copyright © 2011 Jun Kakogawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. R. Alexander and M. Kotelchuck, “Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research,” Public Health Reports, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 306–316, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. J. VanderWeele, J. D. Lantos, J. Siddique, and D. S. Lauderdale, “A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 438–445, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Carroli, C. Rooney, and J. Villar, “How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 15, pp. 1–42, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Carroli, J. Villar, G. Piaggio et al., “WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9268, pp. 1565–1570, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guideline for Obstetrical Practice in Japan, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–5, 2008.
  6. L. C. Coimbra, A. A. Silva, M. T. Alves et al., “Factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization,” Revista de Saude Publica, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 456–462, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. A. Partridge and J. R. Holman, “Effects of a reduced-visit prenatal care clinical practice guideline,” Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 555–560, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Villar, H. Baaqeel, and G. Piaggio, “WHO antenatal care trial research group: WHO antenatal care randomized trial for the elevation of a new model of routine antenatal care,” The Lancet, vol. 357, pp. 1551–1564, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Raatikainen, N. Heiskanen, and S. Heinonen, “Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes,” BMC Public Health, vol. 7, article 268, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Barros, M. Tavares, and T. Rodrigues, “Role of prenatal care in preterm birth and low birthweight in Portugal,” Journal of Public Health Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 321–328, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. I. Heaman, C. V. Newburn-Cook, C. G. Green, L. J. Elliott, and M. E. Helewa, “Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 8, article 15, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. R. Ribeiro, A. M. Guimaraes, R. Q. Gurgel et al., “Risk factors for inadequate prenatal care use in the metropolitan area of Aracaju, Northeast Brazil,” BMC pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 9, p. 31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Yamada, K. Cho, T. Endo, K. Hamatani, and H. Minakami, “Pregnancy outcome in women with no antenatal care in Hokkaido,” Journal of Japan Society of Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 45, pp. 1448–1455, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. R. Taylor, G. R. Alexander, and J. T. Hepworth, “Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions,” Maternal and Child Health Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125–133, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Mothers' and Children's Health and Welfare Association, Maternal and Child Health Statistics of Japan, Mothers' and Children' s Health Organization, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 27–56, 2010.
  16. T. Delvaux, P. Buekens, I. Godin, and M. Boutsen, “Barriers to prenatal care in Europe,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Temple, M. Lutenbacher, and J. Vitale, “Limited access to care and home healthcare,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 371–384, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Kotelchuck, “An evaluation of the kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 1414–1420, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Blondel, P. Dutilh, M. Delour, and S. Uzan, “Poor antenatl care and pregnancy outcome,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 50, pp. 191–196, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Jansone, G. Lindmark, and J. Langhoff, “Perinatal deaths and insufficient antenatal care in Latvia,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 80, pp. 1091–1095, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. M. Vintzileos, C. V. Ananth, J. C. Smulian, W. E. Scorza, and R. A. Knuppel, “The impact of prenatal care in the United States on preterm births in the presence and absence of antenatal high-risk conditions,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 187, no. 5, pp. 1254–1257, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. L. Goldenberg, J. F. Culhane, J. D. Iams, and R. Romero, “Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9606, pp. 75–84, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus