ISRN Mathematical Analysis

VolumeΒ 2011, Article IDΒ 924396, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/924396

## Some Generalizations of Fixed Point Results for Multivalued Contraction Mappings

Department of Mathematics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, Iran

Received 18 August 2011; Accepted 26 September 2011

Academic Editors: A.Β Levy and G.Β Γlafsson

Copyright Β© 2011 A. Azizi and H. P. Masiha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We establish some fixed point results for multivalued contraction type mappings in terms of a -distance in a complete metric space. Our results generalize very recent results of some authors (ΔiriΔ, 2008, 2009; Feng and Liu 2006; Klim and Wardowski 2007; and Latif and Abdou 2011).

#### 1. Introduction

The Banach contraction principle [1] plays an important role in nonlinear analysis. Following the Banach contraction principle, Nadler [2] first initiated the study of fixed point theorems for multivalued contraction mappings and inspired by his results, the fixed point theory of multi-valued contraction has been further developed in different directions by many authors, in particular, by Reich, Mizoguchi-Takahashi, Feng-Liu, and many others.

The aim of this paper is to present results which are generalizations of the very recent results of Klim and Wardowski [3], ΔiriΔ [4, 5], and Latif and Abdou [6], as well as of the result of Mizoguchi and Takahashi [7] and many others.

Let be a metric space. We denote the collection of all nonempty closed bounded subsets of by and the collectifon of all nonempty closed subsets and all nonempty compact subsets of by and , respectively. Throughout this paper, we assume that , , , and denote the sets of all real numbers, positive integers, even positive integers, and odd positive integers, respectively. Let be the Hausdorff metric induced by , that is, for all , where . An element is said to be a fixed point of a multi-valued mapping if . A map is called lower semicontinuous if for any sequence in and such that , we have .

The following theorem is an extension of Banach contraction principle for multi-valued mappings, which was obtained by Nadler in [2].

Theorem 1.1 (see [2]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. Assume that there exists such that for all,
**
then there exists such that .**A generalization of Theorem 1.1 was proved by Mizoguchi and Takahashi that is, in fact, a partial answer of question of Reich [8].*

Theorem 1.2 (see [7]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. If there exists a function such that for each , and if for all ,
**
then there exists such that .**Recently, an interesting result had been obtained by Feng and Liu [9]. They extended Theorem 1.1 in another direction different from that of Mizoguchi-Takahashi's theorem.*

Theorem 1.3 (see [9]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. If there exist constants , , such that for any there is satisfying the following two conditions: *(i)*,*(ii)*, **then there exists such that provided the function is lower semicontinuous.*

By using the ideas of Mizoguchi-Takahashi and Feng-Liu, Klim and Wardowski proved the following two theorems that are different from Theorem 1.2.

Theorem 1.4 (see [3]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. Assume that the following conditions hold:*(i)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous; *(ii)*there exists a constant and a function satisfying , for each , and for any there is satisfying
Then there exists such that .*

Theorem 1.5 (see [3]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. Assume that the following conditions hold:*(i)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous;*(ii)*there exists a function satisfying , for each , and for any there is satisfying
** Then there exists such that .*

In [4, 5], ΔiriΔ proved a few interesting theorems which are generalizations of the above-mentioned theorems, one of which is as follows.

Theorem 1.6 (see [4]). *Let be a complete metric space, and let be a multi-valued mapping. If there exist a function and a nondecreasing function , , such that
**
and for any there is satisfying the following two conditions:
**
then has a fixed point in provided is lower semi-continuous.*

Very recently the fixed point theorems of ΔiriΔ were extended by Liu et al. [10] and by Nicolae [11] in a new direction. Also Latif and Abdou [6] improve two theorems of ΔiriΔ with respect to -distance. The concept of -distance was introduced by Kada et al. [12] on a metric space as follows.

Let be a metric space, then a function is called a -distance on if the following axioms are satisfied: (1), for any ; (2)for any , is lower semi-continuous; (3)for any , there exists such that and imply .

The metric is a -distance on . One can see other examples of -distances in [12]. One of theorems, which was proved by Latif and Abdou, is as follows.

Theorem 1.7 (see [6]). *Let be a complete metric space with a -distance . Let be a multi-valued map. Assume that the following conditions hold: *(i)*there exist a constant and a function such that , for each ; *(ii)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous; *(iii)*for any , there is satisfying **
Then there exists such that . Further, if , then .*

For the proof of the main results, we need the following crucial lemma [13].

Lemma 1.8. *Let (X,d) be a metric space, and let be a -distance on . Let and be two sequences in , let and be sequences in converging to zero, and let . Then the following hold: *(1)*if and for any , then converges to ; *(2)*if for any with , then is a Cauchy sequence. *

In the present paper, using the concept of -distance, in the same direction which has been used in [10, 11], we introduce some new contraction conditions for multi-valued mappings in complete metric spaces and three fixed point theorems for such contractions are proved. Our results generalize Theorems 1.6 and 1.7, and many other theorems.

#### 2. Main Results

Recall that a sequence in is called an orbit of at if , for all , and for any and .

Now, we shall prove a theorem which is a generalization of Theorem 1.7.

Theorem 2.1. *Let be a complete metric space with a -distance , and let be a multi-valued mapping from into . Assume that the following conditions hold: *(i)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous;*(ii)*there exist the functions , which satisfy
*(iii)*for any , there is satisfying **
Then, there exists such that .*

*Proof. *Let . Then there exists such that
Then, from (2.3), we have
Continuing this process, we can define an orbit of in , such that
for all , which imply that
We can assume that for all , since for some , then from (2.5), , and so for every , there exists such that ; consequently, ; so by Lemma 1.8, and thus , that is, the assertion of the theorem is proved. Since for all , then we have
Thus is a decreasing sequence of positive real numbers and hence converges to a nonnegative number , . Let . Then, for , we can take such that
Then,
thus, . Therefore, by we can take such that
Now, from (2.5), (2.9), and (2.10), we have
for all , where and . Then for any , , we have
Hence, by Lemma 1.8,ββ is a Cauchy sequence so there exists such that . Since is lower semi-continuous, we obtain
and thus,
Now, we clime that . Notice that the function is lower semi-continuous for all . Since , then by (2.12),
for all . On the other hand, from (2.14), for every , there exists such that . Then, for all , we have
Therefore, from (2.15), (2.16), we can find the sequences and in converging to zero, such that and for any ; then by Lemma 1.8ββ. The closedness of implies .

Now, we shall prove a theorem which is different from Theorem 2.1 and is a generalization of Theorem 1.6.

Theorem 2.2. *Let be a complete metric space with a -distance , and let be a multi-valued mapping from into . Assume that the following conditions hold: *(i)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous;*(ii)*there exist the functions , which satisfy
and is nondecreasing; *(iii)*for any , there is satisfying
Then, there exists such that .*

*Proof. *By following the lines in the proof of Theorem 2.1, one can construct an orbit of in such that
for all , which imply that
Thus, is a decreasing sequence, and so there exists such that . From (2.19) and (2.20), we have
for all . Now we clime that is a nonincreasing sequence. Suppose not. Then there exists such that . Since is nondecreasing, then from (2.22), we get that
which is a contradiction. Then, is a nonincreasing sequence and so is convergent. Now by using the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we obtain the existence of a real number and such that
thus . On the other hand, since is nondecreasing, then by (2.19), we have
For the rest of the proof, we can go on as in the proof of Theorem 2.1.

In the same manner, we can present the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3. *Let be a complete metric space with a -distance , and let be a multi-valued mapping from into . Assume that the following conditions hold: *(i)*the map , defined by , , is lower semi-continuous,*(ii)*there exist the functions , which satisfy
and also one of and is nondecreasing; *(iii)*for any , there is satisfying**
Then, there exists such that .*

*Proof. *As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, one can construct an orbit of in such that (2.19), (2.20), (2.21), and (2.22) hold. Then, is a decreasing sequence and so there exists such that . Now we clime that is a nonincreasing sequence. Suppose not. Then there exists such that . Since one of and is nondecreasing, it follows from (2.22) that
which is a contradiction. Thus is a nonincreasing sequence and so is convergent. Now as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we obtain the existence of a real number and such that
thus . If is nondecreasing, then from assumption and (2.19), we have
and if is nondecreasing then from (2.19) and (2.20), we have
for all . Therefore, in all cases we have shown
and so, by following as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can take such that
for all , where . The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1.

*Remark 2.4. *Theorem 2.1 is a generalization of Theorem 1.7. In fact, if we consider and , then the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Also, one can see that Theorem 2.1 generalizes Theorem 2.2 of Nicolae [11].

*Remark 2.5. *Theorem 2.2 essentially generalizes Theorem 1.6. Indeed, if we consider and , then all assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied.

The following example shows that there are mappings which satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 but do not satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 1.7.

*Example 2.6. *Consider , for , and . Then is a bounded complete subset of . Let , for all . Define a mapping from into by
It is easy to verify that
is lower semi-continuous in . Define and by
Since
then, we have
For , there exists such that
and for , , if , there exists satisfying
and, if , there exists satisfying

Therefore, all assumptions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied and , are two fixed points of . Let us observe that does not satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 1.7 provided that , for all . Indeed, for any function , , there exists , , such that for , if , we have
and if , we have
that is, the assumptions of Theorem 1.7 are not satisfied. The next example is an application of Theorem 2.3.

*Example 2.7. *Let be as in the Example 2.6, and let , for all . Note that is a -distance on . Define a mapping from into by
Clearly,
is lower semi-continuous in . Define and by
Note that is nondecreasing and , for each . Since
then,
For , there exists such that
and for , , if , there exists satisfying
and, if , there exists satisfying
Then, all assumptions of Theorem 2.3 are satisfied and , are two fixed points of . Note that .

#### Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable and useful comments.

#### References

- S. Banach, βSur les opΓ©rations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux Γ©quations intΓ©grales,β
*Fundamenta Mathematicae*, vol. 3, pp. 133β181, 1922. View at Google Scholar - S. B. Nadler, βMulti-valued contraction mappings,β
*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 30, pp. 475β488, 1969. View at Google Scholar - D. Klim and D. Wardowski, βFixed point theorems for set-valued contractions in complete metric spaces,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 334, no. 1, pp. 132β139, 2007. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - L. B. ΔiriΔ, βFixed point theorems for multi-valued contractions in metric spaces,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 348, pp. 499β507, 2008. View at Google Scholar - L. ΔiriΔ, βMulti-valued nonlinear contraction mappings,β
*Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications*, vol. 71, no. 7-8, pp. 2716β2723, 2009. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - A. Latif and A. A. N. Abdou, βMultivalued generalised nonlinear contractive maps and fixed points,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 74, pp. 1436β1444, 2011. View at Google Scholar - N. Mizoguchi and W. Takahashi, βFixed point theorems for multivalued mappings on complete metric spaces,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 172β188, 1989. View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - S. Reich, βSome problems and results in fixed point theory,β
*Contemporary Mathematics*, vol. 21, pp. 179β187, 1983. View at Google Scholar - Y. Feng and S. Liu, βFixed point theorems for multi-valued contractive mappings and multi-valued Caristi type mappings,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. 103β112, 2006. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Scopus - Z. Liu, W. Sun, S. M. Kang, and J. S. Ume, βOn fixed point theorems for multi-valued contractions,β
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2010, Article ID 870980, 18 pages, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - A. Nicolae, βFixed point theorems for multi-valued mappings of Feng-Liu type,β
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 12, pp. 145β154, 2011. View at Google Scholar - O. Kada, T. Suzuki, and W. Takahashi, βNonconvex minimization theorems and fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces,β
*Mathematica Japonica*, vol. 44, pp. 381β391, 1996. View at Google Scholar - T. Suzuki and W. Takahashi, βFixed point theorems and characterizations of metric completeness,β
*Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 8, pp. 371β382, 1996. View at Google Scholar