Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 928592, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/928592
Clinical Study

Evaluating the Association between Assisted Conception and the Severity of Preeclampsia

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USA
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Received 9 August 2011; Accepted 7 September 2011

Academic Editors: R. Jones and S. San Martin

Copyright © 2011 Kathryn C. Calhoun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. National Survey of Family Growth, CDC 2002, http://www.asrm.org/.
  2. T. Shevell, F. D. Malone, J. Vidaver et al., “Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1039–1045, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. U. Irgens, L. Reisæter, L. M. Irgens, and R. T. Lie, “Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7323, pp. 1213–1216, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. R. Norwitz, “Defective implantation and placentation: laying the blueprint for pregnancy complications,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 13, no. 4, article 2425, pp. 591–599, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Sibai, G. Dekker, and M. Kupferminc, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9461, pp. 785–799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. J. Walker, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 356, no. 9237, pp. 1260–1265, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. Erez, I. S. Vardi, M. Hallak, R. Hershkovitz, D. Dukler, and M. Mazor, “Preeclampsia in twin gestations: association with IVF treatments, parity and maternal age,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. A. Jackson, K. A. Gibson, Y. W. Wu, and M. S. Croughan, “Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 551–563, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Lynch, R. McDuffie, J. Murphy, K. Faber, and M. Orleans, “Preeclampsia in multiple gestation: the role of assisted reproductive technologies,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 445–451, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Maman, E. Lunenfeld, A. Levy, H. Vardi, and G. Potashnik, “Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 240–245, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Ochsenkühn, T. Strowitzki, M. Gurtner et al., “Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. 256–261, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. L. Tan, P. Doyle, S. Campbell et al., “Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 778–784, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Tanbo, P. O. Dale, O. Lunde, N. Moe, and T. Abyholm, “Obstetric outcome in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 188–192, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. “Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia,” ACOG Practice Bulletin, no. 33, January 2002.
  15. S. K. Srinivas, A. C. Morrison, C. M. Andrela, and M. A. Elovitz, “Allelic variations in angiogenic pathway genes are associated with preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 202, no. 5, pp. 445.e1–445.e11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. M. Mazar, S. K. Srinivas, M. D. Sammel, C. M. Andrela, and M. A. Elovitz, “Metabolic score as a novel approach to assessing preeclampsia risk,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 4, pp. 411.e1–411.e5, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. R. Alexander, J. H. Himes, R. B. Kaufman, J. Mor, and M. Kogan, “A United States National reference for fetal growth,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. G. Ray, M. J. Vermeulen, M. J. Schull, and D. A. Redelmeier, “Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9499, pp. 1797–1803, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus