Table of Contents
ISRN Pulmonology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 109295, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/109295
Research Article

FEV1/FEV6: A Reliable, Easy-to-Use, and Cheaper Alternative to FEV1/FVC in Diagnosing Airway Obstruction in Indian Population

1Department of Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Jharkhand, Ranchi 834009, India
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, L.R.S. Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, India

Received 17 July 2012; Accepted 18 September 2012

Academic Editors: K. Nishimura and B. A. Rybicki

Copyright © 2012 Anupam Kumar Singh and Amit Lohia. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. U.S. Public Health Service National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, “Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” 2010, http://www.goldcopd.com.
  2. J. Buffels, J. Degryse, J. Heyrman, and M. Decramer, “Office spirornetry significantly improves early detection of COPD in general practice: the DIDASCO Study,” Chest, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1394–1399, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Lundbäck, A. Lindberg, M. Lindström et al., “Not 15 But 50% of smokers develop COPD?—report from the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Studies,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Stratelis, P. Jakobsson, S. Molstad, and O. Zetterstrom, “Early detection of COPD in primary care: screening by invitation of smokers aged 40 to 55 years,” British Journal of General Practice, vol. 54, no. 500, pp. 201–206, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Zieliñski and M. Bednarek, “Early detection of COPD in a high-risk population using spirometric screening,” Chest, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 731–736, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. R. Miller, J. L. Hankinson, V. Brusasco et al., “Standardisation of spirometry,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 319–338, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. L. Enright, J. E. Connett, and W. C. Bailey, “The FEV1/FEV6 predicts lung function decline in adult smokers,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 444–449, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. P. Swanney, R. L. Jensen, D. A. Crichton, L. E. Beckert, L. A. Cardno, and R. O. Crapo, “FEV6 is an acceptable surrogate for FVC in the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction and restriction,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 917–919, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. P. Swanney, L. E. Beckert, C. M. Frampton, L. A. Wallace, R. L. Jensen, and R. O. Crapo, “Validity of the American thoracic society and other spirometric algorithms using FVC and forced expiratory volume at 6 s for predicting a reduced total lung capacity,” Chest, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1861–1866, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, and W. Vincken, “FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the spirometric detection of airway obstruction and restriction,” Chest, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1560–1564, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Melbye, A. Medbø, and A. Crockett, “The FEV1/FEV6 ratio is a good substitute for the FEV1/FVC ratio in the elderly,” Primary Care Respiratory Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 294–298, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. E. Hansen, X. G. Sun, and K. Wasserman, “Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1244–1250, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. T. Ferguson, P. L. Enright, A. S. Buist, and M. W. Higgins, “Office spirometry for lung health assessment in adults: a consensus statement from the National Lung Health Education Program,” Chest, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1146–1161, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Medical Section of the American Lung Association, “Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 1202–1218, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. P. H. Quanjer, G. J. Tammeling, J. E. Cotes, O. F. Pedersen, R. Peslin, and J. C. Yernault, “Standardized lung function testing. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 16, supplement 6, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Akpinar-Elci, K. B. Fedan, and P. L. Enright, “FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 374–377, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, and W. Vincken, “The role of FEV6 in the detection of airway obstruction,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 1465–1466, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, and W. Vincken, “Obstructive and restrictive spirometric patterns: fixed cut-offs for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 378–383, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Demir, H. D. Ikitimur, N. Koc, and N. Yildirim, “The role of FEV6 in the detection of airway obstruction,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 103–106, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. L. Hankinson, J. R. Odencrantz, and K. B. Fedan, “Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. Population,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 179–187, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. García-Río, J. M. Pino, A. Dorgham, A. Alonso, and J. Villamor, “Spirometric reference equations for European females and males aged 65–85 yrs,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 397–405, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Roca, F. Burgos, J. Sunyer et al., “References values for forced spirometry,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1354–1362, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. ATS Guidelines : Performing pulmonary function tests, 2012.
  24. F. W. Rosa, R. Perez-Padilla, A. Camelier et al., “Efficacy of the FEV1/FEV6 ratio compared to the FEV1/FVC ratio for the diagnosis of airway obstruction in subjects aged 40 years or over,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1615–1621, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. A. Hardie, A. S. Buist, W. M. Vollmer, I. Ellingsen, P. S. Bakke, and O. Mørkve, “Risk of over-diagnosis of COPD in asymptomatic elderly never-smokers,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1117–1122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. E. Pennock, R. M. Rogers, and D. R. McCaffree, “Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant?” Chest, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 97–99, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Frith, A. Crockett, J. Beilby et al., “Simplified COPD screening: validation of the piko-6 in primary care,” Primary Care Respiratory Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Y. Jing, T. C. Huang, W. Cui, F. Xu, and H. H. Shen, “Should FEV1/FEV6 replace FEV1/FVC ratio to detect airway obstruction? a meta analysis,” Chest, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 991–998, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus