Review Article
CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future
Table 1
Summary of studies on EBCT imaging for assessing coronary stent patency.
| Author/year | Patients (n) | Stents (n) | Nonevaluable (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|
Schmermund et al. 1996 [15] | 22 | na | 9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Pump et al. 1998 [17] | 177 | 285 | 7.2 | 82.3 | 97.6 | 77.8 | 98.2 | Pump et al. 2000 [18] | 202 | 321 | 4 | 78 | 98 | 82 | 97 | Knollmann et al. 2004 [16] | 117 | 152* | 9.3 | 48 | 90.1 | 67.7 | 80.5 | Zhou et al. 2005 [19] | 25 | 35 | 8 | 85 | 92.9 | 75 | 96.5 |
| Total/mean | 543 | 793 | 7.5 | 78.7 | 95.7 | 80.5 | 94.4 |
|
|
na: not available; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; *stented segments.
|